SonarQube vs codebeat

Overview

SonarQube

Stacks1.9K

Followers2.0K

Votes53

GitHub Stars10.0K

Forks2.1K

codebeat

Stacks16

Followers94

Votes0

SonarQube vs codebeat: What are the differences?

### Introduction

SonarQube and codebeat are both code analysis tools used to improve code quality but differ in their approach and features. Below are the key differences between SonarQube and codebeat:

1. **Analysis Approach**: SonarQube uses a wide range of static code analysis rules and plugins to detect issues in the codebase, while codebeat focuses on providing simpler, actionable feedback based on fewer, but more relevant rules.

2. **Integration and Languages Supported**: SonarQube offers comprehensive integration with various build tools and supports a wide range of programming languages, while codebeat focuses on popular languages like Python, Ruby, and JavaScript with limited integrations.

3. **Pricing Model**: SonarQube offers open-source and commercial editions with pricing based on the number of lines of code analyzed, while codebeat offers a free tier for open-source projects and a subscription-based pricing model for commercial use, based on monthly active users.

4. **Customization and Configuration**: SonarQube provides extensive customization options for rules, quality profiles, and issue tracking, while codebeat offers a more streamlined approach with minimal configuration settings to focus on actionable insights.

5. **Scalability and Performance**: SonarQube is known for handling large codebases and supporting enterprise-scale projects with robust performance, while codebeat is more suited for smaller to mid-sized projects with a focus on delivering quick feedback to developers.

6. **Community and Support**: SonarQube has a larger community of users, contributors, and support resources, offering more extensive documentation and forums, while codebeat provides personalized support and responsiveness to user feedback.

In Summary, SonarQube and codebeat differ in their analysis approach, language support, pricing model, customization options, scalability, and community support, catering to different needs and preferences in code quality management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube	codebeat
SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.	codebeat helps you prioritize issues and identify quick wins. It provides immediate and continuous feedback on complexity and duplication
Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 16
Followers 2.0K	Followers 94
Votes 53	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 26 Tracks code complexity and smell trends 16 IDE Integration 9 Complete code Review 2 Difficult to deploy Cons 7 Sales process is long and unfriendly 7 Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful 1 Does not integrate with Snyk	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins TeamCity Appveyor Travis CI Apache Ant Bamboo	Slack GitHub Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, codebeat?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

SonarQube vs codebeat: What are the differences?

### Introduction

SonarQube and codebeat are both code analysis tools used to improve code quality but differ in their approach and features. Below are the key differences between SonarQube and codebeat:

1. **Analysis Approach**: SonarQube uses a wide range of static code analysis rules and plugins to detect issues in the codebase, while codebeat focuses on providing simpler, actionable feedback based on fewer, but more relevant rules.

2. **Integration and Languages Supported**: SonarQube offers comprehensive integration with various build tools and supports a wide range of programming languages, while codebeat focuses on popular languages like Python, Ruby, and JavaScript with limited integrations.

3. **Pricing Model**: SonarQube offers open-source and commercial editions with pricing based on the number of lines of code analyzed, while codebeat offers a free tier for open-source projects and a subscription-based pricing model for commercial use, based on monthly active users.

4. **Customization and Configuration**: SonarQube provides extensive customization options for rules, quality profiles, and issue tracking, while codebeat offers a more streamlined approach with minimal configuration settings to focus on actionable insights.

5. **Scalability and Performance**: SonarQube is known for handling large codebases and supporting enterprise-scale projects with robust performance, while codebeat is more suited for smaller to mid-sized projects with a focus on delivering quick feedback to developers.

6. **Community and Support**: SonarQube has a larger community of users, contributors, and support resources, offering more extensive documentation and forums, while codebeat provides personalized support and responsiveness to user feedback.

SonarQube vs codebeat

Overview