Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Codebrag vs Stylelint: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this markdown, we will explore the key differences between Codebrag and Stylelint for website development purposes.
Integration with IDEs: Codebrag offers seamless integration with IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA and Eclipse, providing a smoother workflow for developers. In contrast, Stylelint primarily functions as a command-line tool, offering flexible integration options but lacking the direct IDE support found in Codebrag.
Focus and Scope: Codebrag primarily focuses on facilitating code reviews and collaboration within development teams, providing features tailored towards this purpose. On the other hand, Stylelint is a specialized tool focused solely on enforcing consistent coding styles and detecting errors in Cascading Style Sheets (CSS).
Language Support: Codebrag supports multiple programming languages, allowing for versatile use across different projects with varying tech stacks. In comparison, Stylelint is specifically designed for CSS, ensuring exhaustive and precise linting and analysis for stylesheets without the broader language support of Codebrag.
Customizability and Rules Configuration: Codebrag offers configurable rules and settings for code review processes, allowing teams to adapt the tool to their specific needs and standards. Conversely, Stylelint provides a comprehensive set of predefined rules for CSS linting, with limited scope for customization compared to Codebrag.
Workflow Automation: Codebrag provides automation features for code review workflows, streamlining the process and increasing efficiency within development teams. Meanwhile, Stylelint focuses on static analysis and error detection in CSS files, emphasizing accuracy and consistency in coding styles over workflow automation capabilities.
Community and Support: Codebrag has a dedicated community and solid support system, with active development and regular updates to enhance user experience and address any issues promptly. In contrast, Stylelint also has a supportive community but may have a different focus on user needs and development cycles compared to Codebrag.
In Summary, the key differences between Codebrag and Stylelint lie in their integration with IDEs, focus and scope, language support, customizability, workflow automation, and community support.
Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.
It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.
I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.
And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).
Any recommendation is appreciated.
In the case of .js files I would recommend using both Eslint and Prettier.
You can set up Prettier as an Eslint rule using the following plugin:
https://github.com/prettier/eslint-plugin-prettier
And in order to avoid conflicts between Prettier and Eslint, you can use this config:
https://github.com/prettier/eslint-config-prettier
Which turns off all Eslint rules that are unnecessary or might conflict with Prettier.
you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.
while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.
prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.
i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.
for my teams i set it up like this: - eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support - eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it) - vscode workspace config: format on save - separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting - precommit hooks (husky)
so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)
Pura vida! Well, I had a similar issue and at the end I decided to use Stylelint + Prettier for that job, in our case, we wanted that our linting process includes the SCSS files and not only the JS file, base on that we concluded that using only ESLint to do both things wasn't the best option, so, we integrated prettier with Stylelint, and for that we used a neat plugin that allowed us to use Prettier inside Stylelint here is the link, https://github.com/prettier/stylelint-prettier#recommended-configuration, I hope that this can help you, hasta pronto!, :)
Pros of Codebrag
- Simple, SVN support, easy install and free1
Pros of Stylelint
- Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS5
- Only complains about real problems1
