StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. CodeNarc vs SonarQube

CodeNarc vs SonarQube

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
CodeNarc
CodeNarc
Stacks8
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars327
Forks136

CodeNarc vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare CodeNarc and SonarQube, two popular static code analysis tools used by developers. We will highlight the key differences between these tools.

  1. Customizability: CodeNarc allows developers to define their own rules and customize the code analysis according to their specific requirements. On the other hand, SonarQube provides a wide range of pre-defined rules and offers limited customization options.

  2. Language Support: CodeNarc is primarily designed for analyzing Groovy code, while SonarQube supports a wide range of programming languages including Java, C#, C/C++, Python, JavaScript, and more. This makes SonarQube a more versatile tool for multi-language projects.

  3. Integration: SonarQube offers seamless integration with various build tools and development environments such as Maven, Jenkins, Eclipse, and IntelliJ IDEA. CodeNarc, on the other hand, is less integrated with commonly used development tools, requiring some manual configuration.

  4. Metrics: SonarQube provides detailed metrics and visualizations, allowing developers to track code quality, complexity, and maintainability over time. It offers a comprehensive dashboard that displays various code quality measures. CodeNarc, on the other hand, does not provide extensive metrics and visualizations out-of-the-box.

  5. Rule Sophistication: SonarQube offers more sophisticated rules and analysis capabilities compared to CodeNarc. It leverages machine learning and statistical algorithms to detect code smells, security vulnerabilities, and design flaws more accurately. CodeNarc focuses mainly on detecting common coding conventions and style issues.

  6. Community Support: SonarQube has a large and active community of users and contributors who regularly update and improve the tool. This ensures timely bug fixes, feature enhancements, and a wide range of community plugins. CodeNarc, while actively maintained, has a smaller user base and community.

In summary, CodeNarc is a customizable tool specifically designed for Groovy code analysis, while SonarQube is a more versatile tool with multi-language support and a comprehensive set of pre-defined rules and metrics. SonarQube offers better integration with development tools and provides more sophisticated analysis capabilities. However, CodeNarc offers greater flexibility in defining custom rules and is suitable for projects where Groovy is the primary language.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
CodeNarc
CodeNarc

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

A flexible framework for rules, rule sets and custom rules means it's easy to configure it to fit into your project. Build tool, framework support, and report generation are all enterprise ready.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
Build tool; Framework support; Report generation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
327
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
136
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
8
Followers
2.0K
Followers
10
Votes
53
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
Gradle
Gradle
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Bamboo
Bamboo
Grails
Grails
Apache Maven
Apache Maven

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, CodeNarc?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana