Codeship vs Github Actions

Overview

Codeship

Stacks1.0K

Followers730

Votes1.5K

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

Codeship vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare Codeship and GitHub Actions and highlight the key differences between them. Both Codeship and GitHub Actions are CI/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment) tools that aim to automate software development tasks, but they have several distinct features and functionalities.

Setup and Integration: Codeship is a standalone CI/CD tool that can integrate with various version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. On the other hand, GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with the GitHub platform and can be easily configured within the repository itself. This makes it convenient for developers who are already using GitHub for their code hosting and collaboration needs.
Workflow Configuration: Codeship primarily relies on configuration files, such as the codeship-services.yml and codeship-steps.yml files, for defining workflows and tasks. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, uses YAML-based workflow files (main.yml) that can be stored directly in the repository. This allows for easier version control, collaboration, and visibility of the build and deployment workflows.
Pre-built Actions: GitHub Actions provides a wide range of pre-built actions that can be easily utilized within the workflows. These actions are reusable and cover common development tasks such as testing, building, deploying, and publishing artifacts. Codeship also provides a similar concept called "services" that can be used to define reusable steps, but it may require more manual setup compared to GitHub Actions.
Community and Marketplace: GitHub Actions has a thriving community and a marketplace where developers can discover, share, and contribute to existing actions created by the community. This allows for easy sharing and reuse of workflows across different projects. Codeship does not have a similar marketplace and a well-established community compared to GitHub Actions.
Pricing and Scalability: Codeship offers different pricing plans based on build minutes and parallel pipelines. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, provides a certain number of free build minutes and allows users to purchase additional minutes if needed. GitHub Actions is highly scalable and supports parallelism out of the box, making it suitable for projects with high build or deployment demands.
Integration Ecosystem: GitHub Actions integrates seamlessly with other GitHub features like pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking. This tight integration allows for easy traceability, collaboration, and visibility of the CI/CD workflows within the context of the project. Codeship, being a standalone tool, may not have the same level of integration and visibility within the development ecosystem.

In summary, while both Codeship and GitHub Actions provide CI/CD capabilities, GitHub Actions has the advantage of deeper integration with the GitHub platform, a wider range of pre-built actions, a vibrant community, and a scalable pricing model. Codeship, however, offers a standalone solution that integrates with multiple version control systems and may be suitable for projects with specific requirements or workflows.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Codeship, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Codeship	GitHub Actions
Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
Run you automated tests \| Easily set up Codeship with Github or Bitbucket and trigger your automated tests with a simple push to your repository.; 100 builds & 5 private projects free per month.;Free for OSS.;Configure deployment pipelines \| Set up powerful deployment pipelines that let you deploy with ease and confidence multiple times a day.;Notifications \| Intelligent notifications and integrations keep your team up-to-date.;SSH debug access \| Easily ssh into a debug build to get more insights.;Use your resources to build amazing products. Codeship takes care of managing and scaling your test and delivery infrastructure.	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 1.0K	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 730	Followers 3.1K
Votes 1.5K	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 215 Simple deployments 179 Easy setup 159 Github integration 147 Continuous deployment 110 Bitbucket integration Cons 3 Ui could use some polishing 0 Antiquated ui 0 Difficult to answer build questions	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Read actions in Marketplace Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No manual launch
Integrations
Slack GitLab CI GitHub HipChat Google Compute Engine Ninefold Amazon EC2 Google App Engine AWS CodeDeploy Bitbucket	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Codeship, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Codeship vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

Introduction

Setup and Integration: Codeship is a standalone CI/CD tool that can integrate with various version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. On the other hand, GitHub Actions is tightly integrated with the GitHub platform and can be easily configured within the repository itself. This makes it convenient for developers who are already using GitHub for their code hosting and collaboration needs.
Workflow Configuration: Codeship primarily relies on configuration files, such as the codeship-services.yml and codeship-steps.yml files, for defining workflows and tasks. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, uses YAML-based workflow files (main.yml) that can be stored directly in the repository. This allows for easier version control, collaboration, and visibility of the build and deployment workflows.
Pre-built Actions: GitHub Actions provides a wide range of pre-built actions that can be easily utilized within the workflows. These actions are reusable and cover common development tasks such as testing, building, deploying, and publishing artifacts. Codeship also provides a similar concept called "services" that can be used to define reusable steps, but it may require more manual setup compared to GitHub Actions.
Community and Marketplace: GitHub Actions has a thriving community and a marketplace where developers can discover, share, and contribute to existing actions created by the community. This allows for easy sharing and reuse of workflows across different projects. Codeship does not have a similar marketplace and a well-established community compared to GitHub Actions.
Pricing and Scalability: Codeship offers different pricing plans based on build minutes and parallel pipelines. GitHub Actions, on the other hand, provides a certain number of free build minutes and allows users to purchase additional minutes if needed. GitHub Actions is highly scalable and supports parallelism out of the box, making it suitable for projects with high build or deployment demands.
Integration Ecosystem: GitHub Actions integrates seamlessly with other GitHub features like pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking. This tight integration allows for easy traceability, collaboration, and visibility of the CI/CD workflows within the context of the project. Codeship, being a standalone tool, may not have the same level of integration and visibility within the development ecosystem.

Codeship vs Github Actions

Overview