Concourse vs Octopus Deploy

Overview

Octopus Deploy

Stacks407

Followers493

Votes118

Concourse

Stacks254

Followers393

Votes54

GitHub Stars7.6K

Forks870

Concourse vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

Architecture : Concourse follows a container-based architecture where each task runs in its own isolated container, ensuring a clean environment for each build. In contrast, Octopus Deploy uses a centralized server-agent architecture, allowing for more control and management of deployment processes across multiple servers.
Pipeline Configuration : Concourse uses a declarative pipeline configuration where tasks are defined in a YAML file, making it easier to understand and manage the pipeline. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy uses a GUI-based approach for configuring deployment processes, which provides flexibility but may be more complex to manage for some users.
Native Integrations : Concourse has built-in support for popular version control systems like Git, enabling seamless integration with source code repositories. Octopus Deploy offers a wide range of plugins and integrations with third-party tools, providing greater customization options for users with specific requirements.
Scalability : Concourse is known for its horizontal scalability, allowing users to easily add new worker nodes to handle increased workload and improve performance. Octopus Deploy, while scalable, may require additional configuration and setup to achieve the same level of scalability as Concourse.
Deployment Automation : Octopus Deploy specializes in automated deployment processes, offering advanced features like deployment approvals, release promotions, and automated rollbacks. Concourse focuses more on continuous integration, providing a streamlined approach to building, testing, and deploying applications.
Community Support : Concourse has a growing community of users and contributors, with active development and frequent updates adding new features and enhancements. Octopus Deploy, with a longer presence in the market, has a strong user base and dedicated support resources, ensuring reliable assistance for complex deployment scenarios.

In Summary, Concourse and Octopus Deploy differ in architecture, pipeline configuration, integrations, scalability, deployment automation, and community support, catering to different needs and preferences in the continuous integration and deployment space.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Octopus Deploy, Concourse

veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Octopus Deploy	Concourse
Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.	Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.
Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 870
Stacks 407	Stacks 254
Followers 493	Followers 393
Votes 118	Votes 54
Pros & Cons
Pros 30 Powerful 25 Simplicity 20 Easy to learn 17 .Net oriented 14 Easy to manage releases and rollback Cons 4 Poor UI 2 Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git) 2 Management of Config	Pros 16 Real pipelines 10 Containerised builds 9 Flexible engine 6 Fast 4 Open source Cons 2 Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
Integrations
Jenkins Azure DevOps TeamCity Jira Appveyor Bamboo	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Octopus Deploy, Concourse?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Concourse vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

Architecture : Concourse follows a container-based architecture where each task runs in its own isolated container, ensuring a clean environment for each build. In contrast, Octopus Deploy uses a centralized server-agent architecture, allowing for more control and management of deployment processes across multiple servers.
Pipeline Configuration : Concourse uses a declarative pipeline configuration where tasks are defined in a YAML file, making it easier to understand and manage the pipeline. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy uses a GUI-based approach for configuring deployment processes, which provides flexibility but may be more complex to manage for some users.
Native Integrations : Concourse has built-in support for popular version control systems like Git, enabling seamless integration with source code repositories. Octopus Deploy offers a wide range of plugins and integrations with third-party tools, providing greater customization options for users with specific requirements.
Scalability : Concourse is known for its horizontal scalability, allowing users to easily add new worker nodes to handle increased workload and improve performance. Octopus Deploy, while scalable, may require additional configuration and setup to achieve the same level of scalability as Concourse.
Deployment Automation : Octopus Deploy specializes in automated deployment processes, offering advanced features like deployment approvals, release promotions, and automated rollbacks. Concourse focuses more on continuous integration, providing a streamlined approach to building, testing, and deploying applications.
Community Support : Concourse has a growing community of users and contributors, with active development and frequent updates adding new features and enhancements. Octopus Deploy, with a longer presence in the market, has a strong user base and dedicated support resources, ensuring reliable assistance for complex deployment scenarios.

Concourse vs Octopus Deploy

Overview