StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. Project Management
  5. Confluence vs GitLab

Confluence vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Confluence
Confluence
Stacks26.6K
Followers19.5K
Votes202
GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Confluence vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this analysis, we will compare Confluence and GitLab, focusing on their key differences.

  1. Ownership and Purpose: Confluence is a collaboration tool that serves as a knowledge management system, allowing users to create and organize content, documents, and pages. GitLab, on the other hand, is primarily a web-based Git repository manager and DevOps platform that facilitates collaborative coding, version control, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes.

  2. Content Creation and Formatting: Confluence provides a rich set of formatting options, including macros and templates, enabling users to structure and style their content with ease. GitLab, while it allows some level of content creation, primarily focuses on code management and collaboration, providing features like code review and merge requests.

  3. Version Control and Branching: GitLab excels in version control and offers advanced features for branching, merging, and resolving conflicts in code repositories. It provides a complete history of all changes, enabling users to track and analyze the evolution of their codebase. Confluence, being a knowledge management tool, does not emphasize version control in the same way, and its capabilities in this area are not as robust.

  4. Issue and Project Tracking: GitLab provides extensive project management facilities, including issue tracking, milestones, and kanban boards. These features enable teams to plan, track, and organize their work effectively. Confluence, although it has some basic task management capabilities, is not designed to be a full-fledged project management tool and lacks the comprehensive issue tracking features found in GitLab.

  5. Integration with Development Tools: GitLab seamlessly integrates with various development tools, such as IDEs, issue trackers, Slack, and CI/CD pipelines. This integration streamlines the development workflow and enhances collaboration between team members. Confluence, while it offers some integrations, primarily focuses on internal collaboration and knowledge sharing rather than deep integration with development tools.

In summary, Confluence and GitLab differ significantly in their purpose, content creation capabilities, version control features, project management functionalities, and integration with development tools. While Confluence is a versatile knowledge management system, GitLab excels in code management, version control, and project collaboration within a DevOps environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Confluence, GitLab

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Confluence
Confluence
GitLab
GitLab

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Spaces;Pages;Editor;Macros;Tasks;Attachments;Notifications;Search;Mobile;JIRA Integration;Installation;Customize;Personal;Security
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
26.6K
Stacks
63.4K
Followers
19.5K
Followers
54.5K
Votes
202
Votes
2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 94
    Wiki search power
  • 62
    WYSIWYG editor
  • 43
    Full featured, works well with embedded docs
  • 3
    Expensive licenses
Cons
  • 3
    Expensive license
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Integrations
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Google Drive
Google Drive
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
Jira
Jira
Gliffy
Gliffy
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Confluence, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Asana

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Basecamp

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Redmine

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana