Confluence vs Wiki.js

Overview

Confluence

Stacks26.6K

Followers19.5K

Votes202

Wiki.js

Stacks56

Followers143

Votes2

GitHub Stars27.3K

Forks3.1K

Confluence vs Wiki.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Confluence and Wiki.js, highlighting their key differences.

Pricing: Confluence is a commercial product with a subscription-based pricing model, while Wiki.js is an open-source solution available for free. Confluence offers different pricing tiers based on the number of users, whereas Wiki.js does not have any associated costs.
Hosting Options: Confluence is primarily a cloud-based service provided by Atlassian, where users can store their data on Atlassian's servers. On the other hand, Wiki.js allows users to host their instances on their preferred servers, giving them more control over their data and infrastructure.
Customization and Extensibility: Confluence offers a wide range of plugins and add-ons that allow users to customize and extend its functionality. Wiki.js, being an open-source platform, offers even more flexibility in terms of customization. Users can modify the source code and add custom features according to their specific requirements.
User Interface: Confluence has a polished and intuitive user interface, designed to be user-friendly and easy to navigate. It provides a consistent experience across different devices and platforms. Conversely, Wiki.js has a simpler and more minimalist interface, focusing on functionality rather than fancy visuals.
Collaboration Features: Confluence is known for its robust collaboration features, including real-time editing, commenting, and task management capabilities. It provides a comprehensive solution for teams to collaborate on documentation and knowledge sharing. While Wiki.js also supports collaboration, its collaboration features are not as extensive as Confluence's.
Integration Options: Both Confluence and Wiki.js offer integration options with popular third-party tools and platforms. However, Confluence has a wider range of integrations available, thanks to its widespread adoption and extensive ecosystem. Wiki.js, being relatively newer, has fewer integrations but is constantly expanding its compatibility.

In summary, Confluence and Wiki.js differ in terms of pricing, hosting options, customization, user interface, collaboration features, and integration options. While Confluence is a commercial product with extensive collaboration features and a polished UI, Wiki.js is an open-source solution that provides more customization options and flexible hosting choices.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Confluence	Wiki.js
Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.	It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.
Spaces;Pages;Editor;Macros;Tasks;Attachments;Notifications;Search;Mobile;JIRA Integration;Installation;Customize;Personal;Security	Page permissions; Authentication backends; Host blocking
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 27.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.1K
Stacks 26.6K	Stacks 56
Followers 19.5K	Followers 143
Votes 202	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 94 Wiki search power 62 WYSIWYG editor 43 Full featured, works well with embedded docs 3 Expensive licenses Cons 3 Expensive license	Pros 1 Open Source 1 Fast speed by node.js Cons 2 No tree structure by default
Integrations
GitLab Bitbucket GitHub Google Drive Balsamiq Jira Gliffy	Markdown Git Node.js

What are some alternatives to Confluence, Wiki.js?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Taskulu

Taskulu is a collaborative project planning service. It combines task management, real-time chat and time tracking into a single interface.

Notion

A new tool that blends your everyday work apps into one. It's a unified and collaborative workspace for you and your team

Related Comparisons

Confluence vs Wiki.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Confluence and Wiki.js, highlighting their key differences.

Pricing: Confluence is a commercial product with a subscription-based pricing model, while Wiki.js is an open-source solution available for free. Confluence offers different pricing tiers based on the number of users, whereas Wiki.js does not have any associated costs.
Hosting Options: Confluence is primarily a cloud-based service provided by Atlassian, where users can store their data on Atlassian's servers. On the other hand, Wiki.js allows users to host their instances on their preferred servers, giving them more control over their data and infrastructure.
Customization and Extensibility: Confluence offers a wide range of plugins and add-ons that allow users to customize and extend its functionality. Wiki.js, being an open-source platform, offers even more flexibility in terms of customization. Users can modify the source code and add custom features according to their specific requirements.
User Interface: Confluence has a polished and intuitive user interface, designed to be user-friendly and easy to navigate. It provides a consistent experience across different devices and platforms. Conversely, Wiki.js has a simpler and more minimalist interface, focusing on functionality rather than fancy visuals.
Collaboration Features: Confluence is known for its robust collaboration features, including real-time editing, commenting, and task management capabilities. It provides a comprehensive solution for teams to collaborate on documentation and knowledge sharing. While Wiki.js also supports collaboration, its collaboration features are not as extensive as Confluence's.
Integration Options: Both Confluence and Wiki.js offer integration options with popular third-party tools and platforms. However, Confluence has a wider range of integrations available, thanks to its widespread adoption and extensive ecosystem. Wiki.js, being relatively newer, has fewer integrations but is constantly expanding its compatibility.

Confluence vs Wiki.js

Overview