Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Confluence vs Wiki.js: What are the differences?


This Markdown code provides a comparison between Confluence and Wiki.js, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Pricing: Confluence is a commercial product with a subscription-based pricing model, while Wiki.js is an open-source solution available for free. Confluence offers different pricing tiers based on the number of users, whereas Wiki.js does not have any associated costs.

  2. Hosting Options: Confluence is primarily a cloud-based service provided by Atlassian, where users can store their data on Atlassian's servers. On the other hand, Wiki.js allows users to host their instances on their preferred servers, giving them more control over their data and infrastructure.

  3. Customization and Extensibility: Confluence offers a wide range of plugins and add-ons that allow users to customize and extend its functionality. Wiki.js, being an open-source platform, offers even more flexibility in terms of customization. Users can modify the source code and add custom features according to their specific requirements.

  4. User Interface: Confluence has a polished and intuitive user interface, designed to be user-friendly and easy to navigate. It provides a consistent experience across different devices and platforms. Conversely, Wiki.js has a simpler and more minimalist interface, focusing on functionality rather than fancy visuals.

  5. Collaboration Features: Confluence is known for its robust collaboration features, including real-time editing, commenting, and task management capabilities. It provides a comprehensive solution for teams to collaborate on documentation and knowledge sharing. While Wiki.js also supports collaboration, its collaboration features are not as extensive as Confluence's.

  6. Integration Options: Both Confluence and Wiki.js offer integration options with popular third-party tools and platforms. However, Confluence has a wider range of integrations available, thanks to its widespread adoption and extensive ecosystem. Wiki.js, being relatively newer, has fewer integrations but is constantly expanding its compatibility.

In summary, Confluence and Wiki.js differ in terms of pricing, hosting options, customization, user interface, collaboration features, and integration options. While Confluence is a commercial product with extensive collaboration features and a polished UI, Wiki.js is an open-source solution that provides more customization options and flexible hosting choices.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Confluence
Pros of Wiki.js
  • 94
    Wiki search power
  • 62
    WYSIWYG editor
  • 43
    Full featured, works well with embedded docs
  • 3
    Expensive licenses
  • 1
    Fast speed by node.js
  • 1
    Open Source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Confluence
Cons of Wiki.js
  • 3
    Expensive license
  • 1
    No tree structure by default

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Confluence?

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

What is Wiki.js?

It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Confluence?
What companies use Wiki.js?
See which teams inside your own company are using Confluence or Wiki.js.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Confluence?
What tools integrate with Wiki.js?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to Confluence and Wiki.js?
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.
Microsoft SharePoint
It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.
Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.
Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.
See all alternatives