Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Consul vs Rancher: What are the differences?
Introduction
Consul and Rancher are both popular tools used in the management of containerized environments, but they have significant differences in terms of features and functionality.
Service Discovery and Health Checking: Consul provides a service registry that allows applications to discover and connect to services. It also performs health checks to ensure the availability of services. On the other hand, Rancher integrates with external service registries like Consul for service discovery and health checking.
Multi-Cloud and Multi-Region Support: Consul is designed to work across multiple clouds and regions, providing a flexible infrastructure for distributed systems. Rancher, on the other hand, focuses on managing containerized applications within a single cloud or data center.
Security and Access Control: Consul offers features like ACLs (Access Control Lists) to secure service communication and limit access to resources. In contrast, Rancher provides RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) to manage user access and permissions within the Rancher platform.
Load Balancing and Traffic Management: Consul includes built-in support for load balancing and traffic management, allowing it to route requests to healthy services. Rancher, however, relies on external load balancers and ingress controllers for these capabilities.
Container Orchestration: Rancher incorporates container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes and Docker Swarm, providing a comprehensive solution for managing containerized applications. Consul, on the other hand, does not directly offer container orchestration and focuses more on service discovery and connectivity.
Monitoring and Logging: Rancher includes built-in monitoring and logging capabilities, allowing users to collect and analyze metrics and logs from their containerized environments. Consul does not provide these features natively, but it can be integrated with third-party monitoring and logging tools.
In summary, Consul is a service discovery and networking tool with multi-cloud and multi-region support, whereas Rancher is a comprehensive container management platform that includes features like container orchestration, security, and monitoring.
Pros of Consul
- Great service discovery infrastructure61
- Health checking35
- Distributed key-value store29
- Monitoring26
- High-availability23
- Web-UI12
- Token-based acls10
- Gossip clustering6
- Dns server5
- Not Java4
- Docker integration1
- Javascript1
Pros of Rancher
- Easy to use103
- Open source and totally free79
- Multi-host docker-compose support63
- Load balancing and health check included58
- Simple58
- Rolling upgrades, green/blue upgrades feature44
- Dns and service discovery out-of-the-box42
- Only requires docker37
- Multitenant and permission management34
- Easy to use and feature rich29
- Cross cloud compatible11
- Does everything needed for a docker infrastructure11
- Simple and powerful8
- Next-gen platform8
- Very Docker-friendly7
- Support Kubernetes and Swarm6
- Application catalogs with stack templates (wizards)6
- Supports Apache Mesos, Docker Swarm, and Kubernetes6
- Rolling and blue/green upgrades deployments6
- High Availability service: keeps your app up 24/76
- Easy to use service catalog5
- Very intuitive UI4
- IaaS-vendor independent, supports hybrid/multi-cloud4
- Awesome support4
- Scalable3
- Requires less infrastructure requirements2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Consul
Cons of Rancher
- Hosting Rancher can be complicated10