StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Cloud Content Management System
  5. Contentful vs Ghost

Contentful vs Ghost

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Contentful
Contentful
Stacks838
Followers955
Votes70
Ghost
Ghost
Stacks518
Followers506
Votes219
GitHub Stars51.1K
Forks11.1K

Contentful vs Ghost: What are the differences?

Introduction

Contentful and Ghost are both content management systems (CMS) that are used to create and manage websites. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Content Structure and Flexibility: Contentful provides a flexible content structure that allows users to define and customize their content models. It offers a wide range of content types and fields, allowing for complex and structured content organization. Ghost, on the other hand, follows a more traditional blogging framework with limited content types and fields. It is more suitable for simpler websites with primarily blog-oriented content.

  2. Content Editing Experience: Contentful offers a GUI-based web app for content editing, making it easier for non-technical users to create and manage content. It provides a visual interface for creating and editing content, as well as options for collaboration and version control. Ghost, on the other hand, focuses more on a minimalist and distraction-free writing experience. It offers a markdown editor and a simple interface optimized for writing blog posts.

  3. Developer-Friendly Features: Contentful provides extensive APIs, SDKs, and webhooks that offer developers more flexibility for integrating and extending the platform. It allows for custom integrations, third-party services, and supports a wide range of programming languages. Ghost, on the other hand, is designed to be developer-friendly out of the box. It provides a robust API and extensive theme customization options, allowing developers to build and customize websites with ease.

  4. Hosting and Deployment: Contentful is a headless CMS, which means that it provides content management services without built-in hosting capabilities. Users need to host their websites separately and integrate them with Contentful via APIs. Ghost, on the other hand, provides hosting as part of its service. It offers a built-in hosting solution and takes care of the deployment and hosting aspects, making it a more convenient option for users who don't want to set up and manage their own hosting infrastructure.

  5. Price and Licensing: Contentful offers a flexible pricing structure based on usage, with different pricing tiers depending on the number of content entries, users, and assets. It also offers a free plan with some limitations. Ghost, on the other hand, follows a different pricing model. It offers both self-hosted and managed hosting options, with different pricing plans based on features and support. Self-hosted versions of Ghost are open-source and available for free, while managed hosting plans have pricing based on the number of members and usage.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: Contentful has a larger and more mature ecosystem, with a wide range of integrations, plugins, and developer tools available. It has a well-established community and a marketplace for extensions and integrations. Ghost, on the other hand, has a smaller but growing ecosystem. It has an active community and a marketplace for themes and integrations, but it may have fewer options compared to Contentful.

In summary, Contentful and Ghost are both CMS platforms, but Contentful offers more flexibility in content structure, a GUI-based content editing experience, extensive developer-friendly features, and a larger ecosystem. Ghost, on the other hand, focuses on a minimalist writing experience, offers built-in hosting, and has a different pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Contentful, Ghost

Kamil
Kamil

Product Manager at Wooclap

Jul 17, 2020

Needs adviceonGoogle DocsGoogle DocsGatsbyGatsby

Hi StackSharers, your help is dearly needed as we're making a move to which we will commit for the next few years.

Problem: As our Marketing team gets growing needs to publish content fast and autonomously, we're trying to add a CMS to our stack.

Specs:

  • This CMS should have fairly advanced marketing features: either natively built, and/or be open source, so we can either find third parties' plugins suiting our needs or build our own plugins homebrew.

  • "Advanced marketing features" like these: Non-devs should be able to handle content autonomously, Should have a non-dev friendly interface, should allow creating a library of reusable components/modules, should show the preview before publishing, should have a calendar with all publications, should show the history/tracking, should allow collaborating (Google Docs like), should display characters limit optimized for SEO.

Solution: We're considering an SSG + Headless CMS combination. We're fairly confident for the SSG (Gatsby), but we're still uncertain which CMS we should choose.

122k views122k
Comments
Maxim
Maxim

Web developer

Apr 14, 2020

Needs adviceonSanitySanity

Hi Community, Would like to ask for advice from people familiar with those tools. We are a small self-funded startup and initial cost for us is very important at that stage. That's why we are leaning towards Sanity. The CMS will be used to power our website and flutter cross-platform mobile applications.

108k views108k
Comments
Xander
Xander

Founder at Rate My Meeting

Mar 30, 2020

Decided

So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.

243k views243k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Contentful
Contentful
Ghost
Ghost

With Contentful, you can bring your content anywhere using our APIs, completely customize your content structure all while using your preferred programming languages and frameworks.

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Platform agnostic headless CMS; GraphQL and REST APIs; Fast delivery with global CDNs; Images API; Language and framework agnostic; Extensible web interface; CI/CD-ready; Flexible data; App Marketplace integrations; App Framework for building your own; Scheduled publishing, teams, tasks & comments; Localization with fallbacks
An intuitive, minimal editor; Ultra-fast content management; All SEO features built-in natively; Native desktop & mobile apps; Publish once, distribute everywhere; Headless CMS with Node.js REST APIs; Over 19x faster than WordPress; Secure & independently audited; Custom theme or any JAMstack front-end
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
51.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
11.1K
Stacks
838
Stacks
518
Followers
955
Followers
506
Votes
70
Votes
219
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 30
    API-based cms
  • 17
    Much better than WordPress
  • 11
    Simple and customizable
  • 5
    Images API
  • 3
    Free for small projects
Cons
  • 5
    No repeater Field
  • 5
    No spell check
  • 4
    No free plan
  • 3
    Slow dashboard
  • 2
    Limited content types
Pros
  • 45
    Beautiful
  • 35
    Fast
  • 29
    Quick/simple post styling
  • 20
    Open source
  • 20
    Live Post Preview
Integrations
Algolia
Algolia
imgix
imgix
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Saleor
Saleor
Twilio
Twilio
Mailgun
Mailgun
Cloudinary
Cloudinary
GraphQL Playground
GraphQL Playground
commercetools
commercetools
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Contentful, Ghost?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

Sanity

Sanity

Sanity is a headless, real-time CMS where the editor is an open source React-based construction kit and the backend is a graph-oriented cloud datastore with a globally distributed CDN.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack