StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Convox vs Heroku

Convox vs Heroku

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
Convox
Convox
Stacks42
Followers55
Votes37

Convox vs Heroku: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Ease of Use**: Convox is known for its simple configuration and straightforward deployment process, making it easy for developers to set up and manage applications. On the other hand, Heroku provides a more user-friendly interface and abstracts away much of the infrastructure management, which can be beneficial for beginners.
   
2. **Customization**: Convox offers a high level of customization and control over the underlying infrastructure, allowing developers to tailor their setups according to specific requirements. In contrast, Heroku restricts certain configurations to maintain a standardized environment, which can limit flexibility but also simplify operations.

3. **Pricing Structure**: Convox typically follows a more cost-effective pricing structure compared to Heroku, especially for larger projects or high-traffic applications. Developers can optimize costs based on resource usage and scale efficiently with Convox's pricing model, whereas Heroku's pricing may become less predictable for complex deployments.

4. **Integration with Ecosystem**: Heroku has a well-established ecosystem with a broad range of add-ons, data services, and integrations, making it easier to extend the functionality of applications. Convox, while more focused on core infrastructure management, may require more manual configuration to utilize external services and tools from the ecosystem.

5. **Support and Documentation**: Heroku offers robust support options, extensive documentation, and a vibrant community, which can be beneficial for troubleshooting and learning. Convox, although it provides adequate documentation, may not have the same level of community support and resources available, potentially leading to longer resolution times for issues.

6. **Scalability**: Both Convox and Heroku are capable of scaling applications horizontally and vertically; however, Convox's focus on infrastructure control may offer more granular scalability options for fine-tuning performance and resource allocation, especially in complex or demanding environments.

In Summary, Convox and Heroku differ in ease of use, customization, pricing structure, integration with ecosystems, support, documentation, and scalability options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Heroku, Convox

Alex
Alex

Oct 20, 2020

Decided

I'm transitioning to Render from heroku. The pricing scale matches my usage scale, yet it's just as easy to deploy. It's removed a lot of the devops that I don't like to deal with on setting up my own raw *nix box and makes deployment simple and easy!

Clustering I don't use clustering features at the moment but when i need to set up clustering of nodes and discoverability, render will enable that where Heroku would require that I use an external service like redis.

Restarts The restarts are annoying. I understand the reasoning, but I'd rather watch my service if its got a memory leak and work to fix it than to just assume that it has memory leaks and needs to restart.

101k views101k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
Convox
Convox

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Convox is an open source Platform as a Service that runs in your own Amazon Web Services (AWS) account. Instead of signing up for a multi-tenant PaaS like Heroku, you can have your own. This gives you privacy and control over your platform and avoids the substantial markup on AWS prices that other platforms charge.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
Instant Deploys;Runs in your AWS account;Open Source;Container Management; Kubernetes
Statistics
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
42
Followers
20.5K
Followers
55
Votes
3.2K
Votes
37
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 7
    Storage
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
Pros
  • 7
    It makes deployment management to AWS dependable.
  • 7
    Your own scalable Heroku in 5 minutes
  • 6
    Free, you only pay for AWS resources
  • 5
    Built on Docker
  • 5
    Convox deploy - deploys your app in one command
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Amazon EKS
Amazon EKS
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Datadog
Datadog

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Convox?

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase