StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. CrossBrowserTesting vs TestComplete

CrossBrowserTesting vs TestComplete

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestComplete
TestComplete
Stacks39
Followers60
Votes0
CrossBrowserTesting
CrossBrowserTesting
Stacks36
Followers40
Votes0

CrossBrowserTesting vs TestComplete: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Integration with Automation Tools**: CrossBrowserTesting provides integrations with popular automation tools like Selenium and Appium, making it easier for teams to incorporate automated testing into their workflows. TestComplete, on the other hand, offers a robust built-in scripting language and IDE for creating and executing automated tests without the need for additional tools.

2. **Cloud Testing Capabilities**: CrossBrowserTesting offers a cloud-based testing platform that allows users to test their web and mobile applications on a wide range of browsers and devices. TestComplete, on the other hand, primarily focuses on desktop and web application testing within the local environment, with limited cloud testing capabilities.

3. **Object Recognition Approach**: TestComplete employs a unique Test Visualizer tool that uses AI-driven technology for robust object recognition, making it easier to create stable tests even when UI elements change. In contrast, CrossBrowserTesting relies on traditional object identification methods, such as XPath and CSS selectors, which may require more manual maintenance as UI changes occur.

4. **Mobile Testing Support**: CrossBrowserTesting excels in mobile testing, offering a variety of mobile devices and OS versions for comprehensive mobile app testing. TestComplete, while capable of mobile testing, does not offer as extensive a range of mobile devices for testing purposes.

5. **Community and Support**: TestComplete boasts a strong community of users and developers who actively contribute to forums and knowledge bases, providing valuable insights and support to users. CrossBrowserTesting, while offering support resources, may not have as active a community presence for users seeking assistance.

6. **Licensing Model**: TestComplete follows a traditional licensing model where users purchase a license based on the number of users and features needed. In comparison, CrossBrowserTesting offers a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on the level of testing required, providing more flexibility for teams with varying testing needs.

In Summary, CrossBrowserTesting and TestComplete differ in their integration with automation tools, cloud testing capabilities, object recognition approach, mobile testing support, community and support, and licensing model, catering to different testing requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestComplete
TestComplete
CrossBrowserTesting
CrossBrowserTesting

It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

It's implemented to ensure a website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base.

Building Automated UI Tests; Object Recognition Engine now with Artificial Intelligence; HTML5 Test Automation; Data-Driven Testing; Automated Test Reporting & Analysis
Live Testing;Automated Screenshots;Visual Comparisons;Selenium Testing;Local Testing;Real Devices
Statistics
Stacks
39
Stacks
36
Followers
60
Followers
40
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Git
Git
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
Mocha
Mocha
WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO
Slack
Slack
Protractor
Protractor
Jira
Jira
Appium
Appium
TeamCity
TeamCity
Codeception
Codeception
Behat
Behat
Karma
Karma

What are some alternatives to TestComplete, CrossBrowserTesting ?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana