Crucible vs Forge

Overview

Forge

Stacks10

Followers24

Votes1

Crucible

Stacks55

Followers118

Votes12

Crucible vs Forge: What are the differences?

Introduction Crucible and Forge are two popular software development tools, each with its own unique features and functions.

Integration: One key difference between Crucible and Forge is their level of integration with other tools. Crucible offers seamless integration with JIRA, enabling users to create and review code within the same platform. On the other hand, Forge provides integration with a wide range of third-party tools, allowing users to build, deploy, and manage applications using their preferred tools.
Code Review: Another significant difference between Crucible and Forge lies in their approach to code review. Crucible is specifically designed for code review purposes, offering features such as inline comments, detailed metrics, and notifications. Forge, on the other hand, focuses more on the collaborative aspects of code development, providing tools for real-time pair programming and code sharing.
Customization: When it comes to customization options, Crucible and Forge differ significantly. Crucible allows users to customize and configure their code review workflows, defining their own checklists and criteria. Forge, on the other hand, offers a more opinionated approach to development, providing predefined templates and best practices that guide the development process.
Deployment: Crucible and Forge also differ in terms of their deployment options. Crucible is a self-hosted solution, meaning that users have to set up and manage the software on their own servers. On the contrary, Forge is a cloud-based platform that handles all the deployment and infrastructure management, allowing users to focus solely on their development tasks.
Scalability: Scalability is another important aspect where Crucible and Forge show differences. Crucible is designed for small to medium-sized teams, providing a streamlined and focused code review experience. Forge, on the other hand, caters to larger development teams, offering features such as advanced collaboration tools and fine-grained access controls, making it suitable for enterprise-level software development.
Pricing: Last but not least, the pricing model differs between Crucible and Forge. Crucible follows a traditional licensing model, where users have to purchase licenses based on the number of users. Forge, on the other hand, operates on a subscription-based pricing model, charging users based on the usage and number of features utilized.

In summary, Crucible and Forge differ in terms of integration, code review approach, customization options, deployment options, scalability, and pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Forge	Crucible
Fastest possible way to host lighting-fast static websites for small businesses, web startups, and app developers.	It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.
Drag & Drop, or sync with Dropbox or GitHub; Version Based History; Optimized for Speed; Collaborate with Others; Live Site Previews; File differences;	Workflow-based reviews;Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets;Create reviews from the command line;One-click reviews from changesets or issues;Threaded comments, inline discussions
Statistics
Stacks 10	Stacks 55
Followers 24	Followers 118
Votes 1	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Fgfgf	Pros 5 JIRA Integration 4 Post-commit preview 2 Has a linux version 1 Pre-commit preview
Integrations
GitHub Dropbox	Trello Jira Bitbucket Confluence

What are some alternatives to Forge, Crucible?

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman vs Swagger UI

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Crucible vs Forge: What are the differences?

Introduction Crucible and Forge are two popular software development tools, each with its own unique features and functions.

Integration: One key difference between Crucible and Forge is their level of integration with other tools. Crucible offers seamless integration with JIRA, enabling users to create and review code within the same platform. On the other hand, Forge provides integration with a wide range of third-party tools, allowing users to build, deploy, and manage applications using their preferred tools.
Code Review: Another significant difference between Crucible and Forge lies in their approach to code review. Crucible is specifically designed for code review purposes, offering features such as inline comments, detailed metrics, and notifications. Forge, on the other hand, focuses more on the collaborative aspects of code development, providing tools for real-time pair programming and code sharing.
Customization: When it comes to customization options, Crucible and Forge differ significantly. Crucible allows users to customize and configure their code review workflows, defining their own checklists and criteria. Forge, on the other hand, offers a more opinionated approach to development, providing predefined templates and best practices that guide the development process.
Deployment: Crucible and Forge also differ in terms of their deployment options. Crucible is a self-hosted solution, meaning that users have to set up and manage the software on their own servers. On the contrary, Forge is a cloud-based platform that handles all the deployment and infrastructure management, allowing users to focus solely on their development tasks.
Scalability: Scalability is another important aspect where Crucible and Forge show differences. Crucible is designed for small to medium-sized teams, providing a streamlined and focused code review experience. Forge, on the other hand, caters to larger development teams, offering features such as advanced collaboration tools and fine-grained access controls, making it suitable for enterprise-level software development.
Pricing: Last but not least, the pricing model differs between Crucible and Forge. Crucible follows a traditional licensing model, where users have to purchase licenses based on the number of users. Forge, on the other hand, operates on a subscription-based pricing model, charging users based on the usage and number of features utilized.

In summary, Crucible and Forge differ in terms of integration, code review approach, customization options, deployment options, scalability, and pricing model.