Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Crucible
Crucible

34
30
+ 1
11
RuboCop
RuboCop

194
126
+ 1
38
Add tool

Crucible vs RuboCop: What are the differences?

Developers describe Crucible as "Review code, discuss changes, share knowledge, and identify defects". Review code, discuss changes, share knowledge, and identify defects with Crucible's flexible review workflow. It's code review made easy for Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and more. On the other hand, RuboCop is detailed as "A Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide". RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Crucible and RuboCop can be primarily classified as "Code Review" tools.

"JIRA Integration" is the primary reason why developers consider Crucible over the competitors, whereas "Open-source" was stated as the key factor in picking RuboCop.

RuboCop is an open source tool with 10.1K GitHub stars and 2.14K GitHub forks. Here's a link to RuboCop's open source repository on GitHub.

StackShare, ezCater, and Talkable are some of the popular companies that use RuboCop, whereas Crucible is used by Eyereturn Marketing, qcue, and Scientific Learning. RuboCop has a broader approval, being mentioned in 44 company stacks & 25 developers stacks; compared to Crucible, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Crucible?

It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.

What is RuboCop?

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Crucible?
Why do developers choose RuboCop?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Crucible?
      What companies use RuboCop?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Crucible?
      What tools integrate with RuboCop?
      What are some alternatives to Crucible and RuboCop?
      Bitbucket
      Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
      GitHub
      GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
      ESLint
      A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.
      SonarQube
      SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.
      Code Climate
      After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about Crucible and RuboCop
      Francisco Quintero
      Francisco Quintero
      Tech Lead at Dev As Pros | 7 upvotes 226K views
      atDev As ProsDev As Pros
      Node.js
      Node.js
      Rails
      Rails
      Amazon EC2
      Amazon EC2
      Heroku
      Heroku
      RuboCop
      RuboCop
      JavaScript
      JavaScript
      ESLint
      ESLint
      Slack
      Slack
      Twist
      Twist

      For many(if not all) small and medium size business time and cost matter a lot.

      That's why languages, frameworks, tools, and services that are easy to use and provide 0 to productive in less time, it's best.

      Maybe Node.js frameworks might provide better features compared to Rails but in terms of MVPs, for us Rails is the leading alternative.

      Amazon EC2 might be cheaper and more customizable than Heroku but in the initial terms of a project, you need to complete configurationos and deploy early.

      Advanced configurations can be done down the road, when the project is running and making money, not before.

      But moving fast isn't the only thing we care about. We also take the job to leave a good codebase from the beginning and because of that we try to follow, as much as we can, style guides in Ruby with RuboCop and in JavaScript with ESLint and StandardJS.

      Finally, comunication and keeping a good history of conversations, decisions, and discussions is important so we use a mix of Slack and Twist

      See more
      Jerome Dalbert
      Jerome Dalbert
      Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare | 5 upvotes 216.1K views
      atStackShareStackShare
      GitHub
      GitHub
      CircleCI
      CircleCI
      Code Climate
      Code Climate
      Brakeman
      Brakeman
      RuboCop
      RuboCop
      RSpec
      RSpec
      Rails
      Rails
      Git
      Git
      #ContinuousIntegration

      The continuous integration process for our Rails backend app starts by opening a GitHub pull request. This triggers a CircleCI build and some Code Climate checks.

      The CircleCI build is a workflow that runs the following jobs:

      • check for security vulnerabilities with Brakeman
      • check code quality with RuboCop
      • run RSpec tests in parallel with the knapsack gem, and output test coverage reports with the simplecov gem
      • upload test coverage to Code Climate

      Code Climate checks the following:

      • code quality metrics like code complexity
      • test coverage minimum thresholds

      The CircleCI jobs and Code Climate checks above have corresponding GitHub status checks.

      Once all the mandatory GitHub checks pass and the code+functionality have been reviewed, developers can merge their pull request into our Git master branch. Code is then ready to deploy!

      #ContinuousIntegration

      See more
      Interest over time
      Reviews of Crucible and RuboCop
      No reviews found
      How developers use Crucible and RuboCop
      No items found
      How much does Crucible cost?
      How much does RuboCop cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      News about Crucible
      More news