Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Datadog vs Vector: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare and highlight the key differences between Datadog and Vector, two popular monitoring and observability tools used in the industry.
Pricing Model: Datadog offers a subscription-based pricing model, where the cost is based on the number of monitored hosts and additional features included. On the other hand, Vector follows an open-source model and is available for free, which makes it a more cost-effective choice for smaller organizations or projects with limited budget constraints.
Data Collection: Datadog relies on agents installed on the target hosts to collect and forward the monitoring data. These agents are responsible for collecting metrics, logs, and traces from various sources. In contrast, Vector is agentless and uses various integrations to collect data from different systems, allowing for more flexibility in deployment and reducing resource consumption on the monitored hosts.
Processing and Transformation: Datadog provides a set of built-in processing and transformation capabilities, allowing users to aggregate, filter, and alert on the collected data. Additionally, it offers advanced analytics and visualizations to gain insights from the monitored data. On the other hand, Vector primarily focuses on data transportation and does not provide as extensive processing and analytics capabilities as Datadog. It mainly focuses on forwarding the data to the desired destination efficiently.
Integrations and Ecosystem: Datadog has a comprehensive list of integrations with various technologies, including cloud providers, databases, and third-party tools. It also provides an extensive ecosystem of plugins and community-supported integrations. While Vector supports a decent set of data sources and outputs, it has a more limited ecosystem compared to Datadog. However, being open-source, Vector allows users to extend its capabilities and add new integrations as per their specific requirements.
Alerting and Notification: Datadog offers a robust alerting system, allowing users to set up custom rules and triggers for proactive monitoring. It provides flexibility in defining notification channels and supports various methods such as email, SMS, webhooks, etc. Vector, being primarily a data transfer tool, does not have native alerting functionality. However, it can be easily integrated with other tools or services in the data pipeline to facilitate alerting and notifications.
Community and Support: Datadog has a large and active community, with a vast user base and extensive documentation. It provides dedicated technical support, including email and chat support, to its subscription-based customers. Vector, being open-source, also has an active community, but the level of support may vary depending on the community's response and contributors' availability.
In summary, Datadog and Vector have notable differences in pricing models, data collection methods, processing capabilities, integrations, alerting functionality, and community support. Each tool has its strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different use cases and requirements.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.
We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.
We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.
You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?
Can't say anything to Sysdig. I clearly prefer Datadog as
- they provide plenty of easy to "switch-on" plugins for various technologies (incl. most of AWS)
- easy to code (python) agent plugins / api for own metrics
- brillant dashboarding / alarms with many customization options
- pricing is OK, there are cheaper options for specific use cases but if you want superior dashboarding / alarms I haven't seen a good competitor (despite your own Prometheus / Grafana / Kibana dog food)
IMHO NewRelic is "promising since years" ;) good ideas but bad integration between their products. Their Dashboard query language is really nice but lacks critical functions like multiple data sets or advanced calculations. Needless to say you get all of that with Datadog.
Need help setting up a monitoring / logging / alarm infrastructure? Send me a message!
Hi Medeti,
you are right. Building based on your stack something with open source is heavy lifting. A lot of people I know start with such a set-up, but quickly run into frustration as they need to dedicated their best people to build a monitoring which is doing the job in a professional way.
As you are microservice focussed and are looking for 'low implementation and maintenance effort', you might want to have a look at INSTANA, which was built with modern tool stacks in mind. https://www.instana.com/apm-for-microservices/
We have a public sand-box available if you just want to have a look at the product once and of course also a free-trial: https://www.instana.com/getting-started-with-apm/
Let me know if you need anything on top.
I have hands on production experience both with New Relic and Datadog. I personally prefer Datadog over NewRelic because of the UI, the Documentation and the overall user/developer experience.
NewRelic however, can do basically the same things as Datadog can, and some of the features like alerting have been present in NewRelic for longer than in Datadog. The cool thing about NewRelic is their last-summer-updated pricing: you no longer pay per host but after data you send towards New Relic. This can be a huge cost saver depending on your particular setup
I'd go for Datadog, but given you have lots of containers I would also make a cost calculation. If the price difference is significant and there's a budget constraint NewRelic might be the better choice.
Coming from a Ruby background, we've been users of New Relic for quite some time. When we adopted Elixir, the New Relic integration was young and missing essential features, so we gave AppSignal a try. It worked for quite some time, we even implemented a :telemetry reporter for AppSignal . But it was difficult to correlate data in two monitoring solutions, New Relic was undergoing a UI overhaul which made it difficult to use, and AppSignal was missing the flexibility we needed. We had some fans of Datadog, so we gave it a try and it worked out perfectly. Datadog works great with Ruby , Elixir , JavaScript , and has powerful features our engineers love to use (notebooks, dashboards, very flexible alerting). Cherry on top - thanks to the Datadog Terraform provider everything is written as code, allowing us to collaborate on our Datadog setup.
I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.
In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.
The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:
- The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
- The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
- The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
- The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
- The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.
Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.
I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).
The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight
NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon
Pros of Datadog
- Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)140
- Easy setup107
- Powerful ui87
- Powerful integrations84
- Great value70
- Great visualization54
- Events + metrics = clarity46
- Notifications41
- Custom metrics41
- Flexibility39
- Free & paid plans19
- Great customer support16
- Makes my life easier15
- Adapts automatically as i scale up10
- Easy setup and plugins9
- Super easy and powerful8
- In-context collaboration7
- AWS support7
- Rich in features6
- Docker support5
- Cute logo4
- Simple, powerful, great for infra4
- Monitor almost everything4
- Full visibility of applications4
- Easy to Analyze4
- Cost4
- Source control and bug tracking4
- Best than others4
- Automation tools4
- Best in the field3
- Expensive3
- Good for Startups3
- Free setup3
- APM2
Pros of Vector
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Datadog
- Expensive20
- No errors exception tracking4
- External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging2
- Complicated1
Cons of Vector
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Datadog?
What is Vector?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Vector?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+32
+31
+22
+46+34+37+26
+44