StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. Forums
  5. Discourse vs Loomio

Discourse vs Loomio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Discourse
Discourse
Stacks278
Followers246
Votes115
GitHub Stars45.5K
Forks8.7K
Loomio
Loomio
Stacks7
Followers9
Votes0

Discourse vs Loomio: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Discourse and Loomio. Both Discourse and Loomio are online platforms that facilitate online discussions and collaboration, but they have distinct features and functions that set them apart from each other.

  1. User Interface and Design: Discourse has a more modern and visually appealing user interface with a clean design that focuses on simplicity. On the other hand, Loomio provides a simple and intuitive interface that is easy to navigate and use.

  2. Discussion Structure: Discourse is structured around threaded discussions, where each reply to a post is shown as a separate line, allowing for a linear and organized conversation. Loomio, on the other hand, uses a nested conversation approach, where discussions are grouped under topics and replies are shown below each topic, enabling a more focused and organized discussion.

  3. Decision-Making Process: While both platforms facilitate discussions, Loomio has a distinct focus on decision-making processes. Loomio offers tools for group decision-making, including features such as polling, consent-based decision-making, and formal proposals. Discourse, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a platform for open-ended discussions and community engagement.

  4. Integration and Customization: Loomio offers limited customization options and integrations with other platforms. It is designed to be a standalone platform for discussions and decision-making. On the other hand, Discourse provides extensive customization options, including the ability to create custom themes and plugins, and it also offers integrations with various other platforms and services, making it more flexible for different use cases.

  5. Pricing: Loomio offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of users and the level of support required. It has both free and paid plans available. Discourse, on the other hand, is an open-source platform, and while there are options for hosting and support available, the core software itself is free to use and modify.

  6. Target Audience: Discourse is primarily aimed at larger online communities and organizations that require a powerful and feature-rich platform for discussions and community engagement. Loomio, on the other hand, is designed for smaller groups, teams, and organizations that focus on collaborative decision-making processes.

In summary, Discourse and Loomio differ in terms of their user interface and design, discussion structure, focus on decision-making processes, customization options and integrations, pricing models, and target audience. Each platform caters to different needs and preferences in facilitating online discussions and collaboration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Discourse
Discourse
Loomio
Loomio

Discourse is a simple, flat forum, where replies flow down the page in a line. Replies are attached to the bottom and top of each post, so you can optionally expand the context of the conversation – without breaking your flow.

It is a free software web application, where users can initiate discussions and put up proposals. It is a simple, user-friendly online tool for collaborative decision-making. Loomio empowers organisations and communities to turn discussion into action, wherever people are.

Remembers your place;Log in with … anything;Paste to share images;Search that actually works;Scalable moderation;Bring your friends;Your stuff belongs to you;Comprehensive API
What if' scenarios; Automatic decision archive; Slack integration; Decision notifications; Change management; Collaborative review; Custom URL and backgrounds; Online team discussions.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
45.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
278
Stacks
7
Followers
246
Followers
9
Votes
115
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Open source
  • 19
    Fast
  • 13
    Email digests
  • 9
    Better than a stereotypical forum
  • 8
    Perfect for communities of any size
Cons
  • 3
    Heavy on server
  • 2
    Difficult to extend
  • 2
    Notifications aren't great on mobile due to being a PWA
No community feedback yet
Integrations
WordPress
WordPress
Zapier
Zapier
Zendesk
Zendesk
Dropbox
Dropbox
Asana
Asana
GitHub
GitHub
Jira
Jira
Slack
Slack
FreshDesk
FreshDesk
Basecamp
Basecamp
Freshbooks
Freshbooks
Zendesk
Zendesk

What are some alternatives to Discourse, Loomio?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack