Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker Hub vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?
Introduction
Docker Hub and Kubernetes are two popular technologies used in the world of containerization and deployment. While they both serve their own purposes, they differ in several key areas. Let's explore these key differences.
Architecture and Purpose: Docker Hub is a cloud-based service that provides a central repository for Docker images, allowing developers to store and share their container images. It focuses on the container image-building process and is primarily used for building and distributing containers. On the other hand, Kubernetes is an open-source container orchestration platform that automates the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. It focuses on the runtime and operational aspects of running containers in production.
Scope of Control: Docker Hub provides control over the container images and their distribution. Developers can push, pull, and manage images using Docker Hub's easy-to-use interface. Kubernetes, on the other hand, provides control over the containerized applications and their infrastructure. It manages the deployment, scaling, and monitoring of applications across multiple containers and hosts.
Networking and Load Balancing: Docker Hub does not provide native networking and load balancing capabilities. It relies on external tools or manual configuration for networking between containers. Kubernetes, on the other hand, has built-in networking and load balancing features. It automatically handles network routing between containers and provides a scalable load balancing solution for distributing traffic.
Application Scalability and Availability: Docker Hub lacks built-in tools for scaling and ensuring high availability of applications. It primarily focuses on the containerization aspect of applications. Kubernetes, on the other hand, excels in application scalability and availability. It allows you to easily scale your application horizontally by adding more replicas and ensures high availability through automatic restarts and replication.
Health Monitoring and Self-Healing: Docker Hub does not have built-in health monitoring and self-healing capabilities. Monitoring and ensuring the health of containers and applications must be handled by external tools or scripts. Kubernetes, on the other hand, monitors the health of containers and applications and provides self-healing capabilities. It automatically restarts failed containers and replaces unhealthy ones to maintain the desired state.
Management and Extensibility: Docker Hub provides a user-friendly interface for managing container images and repositories. However, it is limited to Docker-related tasks and lacks extensive management capabilities. Kubernetes, on the other hand, offers a powerful management interface and API that allows you to manage and monitor your entire cluster. It also supports extensibility through custom resources and controllers, allowing you to extend its functionality as per your requirements.
In summary, Docker Hub focuses on container image building and distribution, while Kubernetes is a comprehensive container orchestration platform that handles the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. Kubernetes provides native networking, load balancing, scalability, high availability, health monitoring, and extensive management capabilities that Docker Hub lacks.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Docker Hub
- Uses a very familiar collaboration model as GitHub, the2
- Provides public and private repositories1
- Quickly creates organizations, add users or create grou1
- Allows users to set permissions to restrict access or s1
- Fairly inexpensive with usage based pricing1
- Security scanning available1
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker Hub
- Lacks fine grain access control1
- Does not provide any insight into the registry usage1
- Lacks LDAP, SAML and OAuth support1
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1