Docker vs fastlane

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

fastlane

Stacks716

Followers437

Votes74

GitHub Stars40.6K

Forks6.0K

Docker vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Docker and Fastlane are both popular tools in the software development ecosystem, but they serve different purposes and have distinct functionalities. Understanding the key differences between Docker and Fastlane can help developers choose the right tool for their specific needs.

Containerization vs Automation: Docker is primarily used for containerization, allowing developers to package and run applications in isolated environments known as containers. In contrast, Fastlane is a continuous integration and automation tool that streamlines the build, testing, and deployment processes of mobile applications.
Platform Compatibility: Docker is platform-agnostic and can run on various operating systems, making it versatile for development across different environments. Fastlane, on the other hand, is specifically designed for mobile app development and provides tailored automation solutions for iOS and Android platforms.
Scope of Use: Docker is utilized for managing and scaling complex applications, providing a consistent environment across different stages of the software development lifecycle. Fastlane, however, focuses on simplifying and accelerating the release process of mobile apps through automated tasks like code signing, testing, and deployment.
Learning Curve: Docker requires a certain level of knowledge in containerization concepts and Docker-specific commands to effectively utilize its capabilities. In comparison, Fastlane offers a more user-friendly interface and abstracts the complexities of mobile app development automation, making it easier for developers to adopt and integrate into their workflows.
Community Support: Docker has a vast community of users and contributors, providing extensive resources, documentation, and third-party tools to enhance the containerization experience. Fastlane also has a supportive community but is more niche-focused on mobile app development, offering specialized plugins and integrations tailored to the needs of iOS and Android developers.
Cost Consideration: Docker is open-source and free to use, with additional paid options for enterprise-level features and support. Fastlane is also open-source and free, offering its automation capabilities without any cost barriers for individual developers or small teams looking to streamline their mobile app workflows.

In Summary, Docker is a versatile containerization tool for managing applications across different environments, while Fastlane specializes in automating the release process of mobile apps on iOS and Android platforms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, fastlane

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

482k views482k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	fastlane
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 40.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.0K
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 716
Followers 143.8K	Followers 437
Votes 3.9K	Votes 74
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Unreliable networking 6 Documentation not always in sync 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	Pros 20 Easy to use 13 Itunes connect deployment 13 Open Source 11 Incredible flexability 9 Third party integrations
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	Testmunk GitHub Bitbucket TestFlight HockeyApp HipChat Crashlytics Travis CI Jenkins Slack

What are some alternatives to Docker, fastlane?

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Greenhouse

Greenhouse automatically builds your project for every commit you make and runs all your unit or UI tests on the emulator/simulator or on real hardware. Automatic build distribution is also supported so that your team and clients are always up to date with the latest state of your apps.

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

Codemagic

Codemagic is the developer's favourite CI/CD tool for mobile app projects. Build your Android, iOS, React Native, Ionic, Unity and Flutter projects on Codemagic.

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

Studio 3T

It's the only MongoDB tool that provides three ways to explore data alongside powerful features like query autocompletion, polyglot code generation, a stage-by-stage aggregation query builder, import and export, SQL query support and more.

OpenVZ

Virtuozzo leverages OpenVZ as its core of a virtualization solution offered by Virtuozzo company. Virtuozzo is optimized for hosters and offers hypervisor (VMs in addition to containers), distributed cloud storage, dedicated support, management tools, and easy installation.

Related Comparisons

Docker vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Containerization vs Automation: Docker is primarily used for containerization, allowing developers to package and run applications in isolated environments known as containers. In contrast, Fastlane is a continuous integration and automation tool that streamlines the build, testing, and deployment processes of mobile applications.
Platform Compatibility: Docker is platform-agnostic and can run on various operating systems, making it versatile for development across different environments. Fastlane, on the other hand, is specifically designed for mobile app development and provides tailored automation solutions for iOS and Android platforms.
Scope of Use: Docker is utilized for managing and scaling complex applications, providing a consistent environment across different stages of the software development lifecycle. Fastlane, however, focuses on simplifying and accelerating the release process of mobile apps through automated tasks like code signing, testing, and deployment.
Learning Curve: Docker requires a certain level of knowledge in containerization concepts and Docker-specific commands to effectively utilize its capabilities. In comparison, Fastlane offers a more user-friendly interface and abstracts the complexities of mobile app development automation, making it easier for developers to adopt and integrate into their workflows.
Community Support: Docker has a vast community of users and contributors, providing extensive resources, documentation, and third-party tools to enhance the containerization experience. Fastlane also has a supportive community but is more niche-focused on mobile app development, offering specialized plugins and integrations tailored to the needs of iOS and Android developers.
Cost Consideration: Docker is open-source and free to use, with additional paid options for enterprise-level features and support. Fastlane is also open-source and free, offering its automation capabilities without any cost barriers for individual developers or small teams looking to streamline their mobile app workflows.

Docker vs fastlane

Overview