Docker vs Hystrix

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Hystrix

Stacks309

Followers163

Votes2

GitHub Stars24.4K

Forks4.7K

Docker vs Hystrix: What are the differences?

1. Scalability and Resource Management: Docker is a containerization platform that allows applications to run in an isolated environment. It provides a lightweight and efficient way to package and deploy software applications, making it easier to scale and manage resources. On the other hand, Hystrix is a latency and fault tolerance library that helps improve the resilience of distributed systems. It focuses on isolating and managing failures within a system, ensuring that the application can handle high loads and recover from failures effectively.
2. Containerization vs Circuit Breaker: Docker uses containerization to package an application and its dependencies into a standardized unit called a container. It provides a consistent environment for the application to run across different platforms. In contrast, Hystrix focuses on circuit breaker patterns to handle faults and failures in distributed systems. It provides a way to prevent cascading failures by stopping the execution of failing operations and falling back to alternative paths.
3. Infrastructure vs Application level: Docker operates at the infrastructure level, providing an abstraction layer that allows applications to be packaged and deployed efficiently. It focuses on managing the runtime environment, dependencies, and resources needed for an application to run. On the other hand, Hystrix operates at the application level, providing a library that developers can use to implement fault tolerance and resilience features within their code.
4. Flexibility vs Fault Tolerance: Docker provides flexibility in terms of running applications across different platforms and environments. It allows applications to be packaged once and run anywhere, providing consistent behavior regardless of the underlying infrastructure. Hystrix, on the other hand, focuses on fault tolerance and resilience, providing mechanisms to handle failures and recover from them. It helps maintain the stability and responsiveness of the system even under high load or failure scenarios.
5. Resource Efficiency vs Performance Optimization: Docker provides resource efficiency by allowing multiple containers to share the same kernel and resources of the host operating system. This allows for efficient utilization of resources and better scalability. Hystrix, on the other hand, focuses on performance optimization by providing mechanisms such as thread isolation, fallbacks, and circuit breakers to prevent failures from affecting the overall system performance.
6. Deployment vs Service Resilience: Docker is primarily focused on deployment, providing a platform for packaging and deploying applications across different environments. It helps streamline the deployment process, making it easier to deliver applications consistently. Hystrix, on the other hand, is focused on service resilience, providing features such as circuit breakers, bulkheads, and timeouts to ensure that failures or performance degradation in one service do not impact other services in a distributed system.

In Summary, Docker focuses on containerization, scalability, and resource management at the infrastructure level, while Hystrix focuses on fault tolerance, resilience, and service-level performance optimization at the application level.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Hystrix

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Hystrix
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	Hystrix is a latency and fault tolerance library designed to isolate points of access to remote systems, services and 3rd party libraries, stop cascading failure and enable resilience in complex distributed systems where failure is inevitable.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Latency and Fault Tolerance;Realtime Operations; Concurrency
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 24.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4.7K
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 309
Followers 143.8K	Followers 163
Votes 3.9K	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	Pros 2 Cirkit breaker
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker, Hystrix?

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

Polly

It is a .NET resilience and transient-fault-handling library that allows developers to express policies such as Retry, Circuit Breaker, Timeout, Bulkhead Isolation, and Fallback in a fluent and thread-safe manner.

Studio 3T

It's the only MongoDB tool that provides three ways to explore data alongside powerful features like query autocompletion, polyglot code generation, a stage-by-stage aggregation query builder, import and export, SQL query support and more.

OpenVZ

Virtuozzo leverages OpenVZ as its core of a virtualization solution offered by Virtuozzo company. Virtuozzo is optimized for hosters and offers hypervisor (VMs in addition to containers), distributed cloud storage, dedicated support, management tools, and easy installation.

SmartOS

It combines the capabilities you get from a lightweight container OS, optimized to deliver containers, with the robust security, networking and storage capabilities you’ve come to expect and depend on from a hardware hypervisor.

Clear Containers

We set out to build Clear Containers by leveraging the isolation of virtual-machine technology along with the deployment benefits of containers. As part of this, we let go of the "generic PC hardware" notion traditionally associated with virtual machines; we're not going to pretend to be a standard PC that is compatible with just about any OS on the planet.

Flatpak

It is a next-generation technology for building and distributing desktop applications on Linux

Related Comparisons

Docker vs Hystrix: What are the differences?

1. Scalability and Resource Management: Docker is a containerization platform that allows applications to run in an isolated environment. It provides a lightweight and efficient way to package and deploy software applications, making it easier to scale and manage resources. On the other hand, Hystrix is a latency and fault tolerance library that helps improve the resilience of distributed systems. It focuses on isolating and managing failures within a system, ensuring that the application can handle high loads and recover from failures effectively.
2. Containerization vs Circuit Breaker: Docker uses containerization to package an application and its dependencies into a standardized unit called a container. It provides a consistent environment for the application to run across different platforms. In contrast, Hystrix focuses on circuit breaker patterns to handle faults and failures in distributed systems. It provides a way to prevent cascading failures by stopping the execution of failing operations and falling back to alternative paths.
3. Infrastructure vs Application level: Docker operates at the infrastructure level, providing an abstraction layer that allows applications to be packaged and deployed efficiently. It focuses on managing the runtime environment, dependencies, and resources needed for an application to run. On the other hand, Hystrix operates at the application level, providing a library that developers can use to implement fault tolerance and resilience features within their code.
4. Flexibility vs Fault Tolerance: Docker provides flexibility in terms of running applications across different platforms and environments. It allows applications to be packaged once and run anywhere, providing consistent behavior regardless of the underlying infrastructure. Hystrix, on the other hand, focuses on fault tolerance and resilience, providing mechanisms to handle failures and recover from them. It helps maintain the stability and responsiveness of the system even under high load or failure scenarios.
5. Resource Efficiency vs Performance Optimization: Docker provides resource efficiency by allowing multiple containers to share the same kernel and resources of the host operating system. This allows for efficient utilization of resources and better scalability. Hystrix, on the other hand, focuses on performance optimization by providing mechanisms such as thread isolation, fallbacks, and circuit breakers to prevent failures from affecting the overall system performance.
6. Deployment vs Service Resilience: Docker is primarily focused on deployment, providing a platform for packaging and deploying applications across different environments. It helps streamline the deployment process, making it easier to deliver applications consistently. Hystrix, on the other hand, is focused on service resilience, providing features such as circuit breakers, bulkheads, and timeouts to ensure that failures or performance degradation in one service do not impact other services in a distributed system.

Docker vs Hystrix

Overview