Docker vs Laravel Homestead

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.4K

Followers143.9K

Votes3.9K

Laravel Homestead

Stacks277

Followers343

Votes33

GitHub Stars3.9K

Forks1.4K

Docker vs Laravel Homestead: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to web development, Docker and Laravel Homestead are two popular choices among developers. While both serve the purpose of creating development environments, there are key differences between Docker and Laravel Homestead that developers should consider.

1. Installation and Setup: Docker requires installation of Docker Engine and Docker Compose on the host machine, whereas Laravel Homestead requires installation of Vagrant and VirtualBox. Docker's installation process is more streamlined and easier compared to Laravel Homestead.

2. Operating System Compatibility: Docker can run on various operating systems including Linux, Windows, and macOS, making it highly compatible. On the other hand, Laravel Homestead is primarily designed for macOS and Linux, limiting its compatibility on Windows machines.

3. Isolation and Portability: Docker provides containerization, which allows applications to run in isolated environments. This isolation ensures that the application will run consistently across different systems. Laravel Homestead is a pre-packaged Vagrant box specifically designed for Laravel, providing a consistent development environment, but lacks the same level of isolation as Docker.

4. Resource requirements: Docker containers have minimal resource overhead, as they share the host's kernel and infrastructure. This makes Docker more lightweight and efficient compared to Laravel Homestead, which runs on a virtual machine with a dedicated amount of resources.

5. Flexibility and Usage: Docker is a general-purpose containerization tool that can be used for various types of applications and frameworks, not just limited to Laravel. Laravel Homestead, on the other hand, is specifically targeted towards Laravel development, offering optimized settings and pre-configured components.

6. Ecosystem and Community Support: Docker has a large and active community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and a wide range of pre-built Docker images that can be easily shared and reused. Laravel Homestead also has a supportive community, but its ecosystem is more focused on Laravel-specific tools and resources.

In summary, Docker and Laravel Homestead have significant differences in terms of installation, compatibility, isolation, resource requirements, flexibility, and community support. Developers should consider these differences based on their specific needs and requirements when choosing between the two.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Laravel Homestead

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Laravel Homestead
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	Laravel Homestead is an official, pre-packaged Vagrant "box" that provides you a wonderful development environment without requiring you to install PHP, HHVM, a web server, and any other server software on your local machine. Homestead runs on any Windows, Mac, or Linux system, and includes the Nginx web server, PHP 5.6, MySQL, Postgres, Redis, Memcached, and all of the other goodies you need to develop amazing Laravel applications.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Ubuntu 14.04;PHP 5.6;HHVM;Nginx;MySQL;Postgres;Node (With Bower, Grunt, and Gulp);Redis;Memcached;Beanstalkd;Laravel Envoy;Fabric + HipChat Extension
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.9K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.4K
Stacks 194.4K	Stacks 277
Followers 143.9K	Followers 343
Votes 3.9K	Votes 33
Pros & Cons
Pros 824 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 461 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 4 Not Secure	Pros 19 Easy to setup 13 Native enviroment 1 Cool if you finally get it set up 4 Win10 by night Devs
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	Laravel Vagrant Vagrant Cloud

What are some alternatives to Docker, Laravel Homestead?

HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)

HHVM uses a just-in-time (JIT) compilation approach to achieve superior performance while maintaining the flexibility that PHP developers are accustomed to. To date, HHVM (and its predecessor HPHPc before it) has realized over a 9x increase in web request throughput and over a 5x reduction in memory consumption for Facebook compared with the PHP 5.2 engine + APC.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

LXC

LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.

rkt

Rocket is a cli for running App Containers. The goal of rocket is to be composable, secure, and fast.

Azure Virtual Machines

You can create Linux and Windows virtual machines. It gives you the flexibility of virtualization for a wide range of computing solutions—development and testing, running applications, and extending your datacenter. It’s the freedom of open-source software configured the way you need it.

Vagrant Cloud

Vagrant Cloud pairs with Vagrant to enable access, insight and collaboration across teams, as well as to bring exposure to community contributions and development environments.

Hosting Provider THE.Hosting

⚡️ THE.Hosting is the best hosting provider. ❇️ Ultra-fast server response time. Web hosting! ✅ Low cost VPS and dedicated servers. ☝ Tariffs on the website. ✅ support@THE.Hosting

Renderjuice

Managed cloud render farm for Blender and automated rendering workflows.

Vessel for OpenClaw: Managed AI Agents on Private VMs

300,000+ OpenClaw instances are currently exposed on the public internet (Shodan: port 18789). Most self-hosted setups miss the tunnel, skip the required flags, share containers. When your agent processes untrusted input and holds access to your accounts, that gap matters. Vessel provides private, dedicated hosting for OpenClaw agents. Each agent runs on its own GCP e2-standard-2 VM, its own kernel, its own disk, no shared memory with other tenants. No public IP. No port 18789 exposure. All traffic routes through an encrypted Cloudflare Tunnel. Secrets are managed separately from the runtime. Provision from a web dashboard, connect to Slack, Discord, or WhatsApp, and destroy when done. Your agent's data stays on your VM, your own Vessel.

Open Source Private Cloud Solutions for Enterprise › Cloudification

100% Open Source based cloud solution for your own private IaaS based on OpenStack, Kubernetes and Ceph. Managed private cloud services from Cloudification.

Related Comparisons

Docker vs Laravel Homestead: What are the differences?

Introduction

1. Installation and Setup: Docker requires installation of Docker Engine and Docker Compose on the host machine, whereas Laravel Homestead requires installation of Vagrant and VirtualBox. Docker's installation process is more streamlined and easier compared to Laravel Homestead.

2. Operating System Compatibility: Docker can run on various operating systems including Linux, Windows, and macOS, making it highly compatible. On the other hand, Laravel Homestead is primarily designed for macOS and Linux, limiting its compatibility on Windows machines.

3. Isolation and Portability: Docker provides containerization, which allows applications to run in isolated environments. This isolation ensures that the application will run consistently across different systems. Laravel Homestead is a pre-packaged Vagrant box specifically designed for Laravel, providing a consistent development environment, but lacks the same level of isolation as Docker.

4. Resource requirements: Docker containers have minimal resource overhead, as they share the host's kernel and infrastructure. This makes Docker more lightweight and efficient compared to Laravel Homestead, which runs on a virtual machine with a dedicated amount of resources.

5. Flexibility and Usage: Docker is a general-purpose containerization tool that can be used for various types of applications and frameworks, not just limited to Laravel. Laravel Homestead, on the other hand, is specifically targeted towards Laravel development, offering optimized settings and pre-configured components.

6. Ecosystem and Community Support: Docker has a large and active community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and a wide range of pre-built Docker images that can be easily shared and reused. Laravel Homestead also has a supportive community, but its ecosystem is more focused on Laravel-specific tools and resources.

Docker vs Laravel Homestead

Overview

Docker vs Laravel Homestead: What are the differences?

Introduction

1. Installation and Setup: Docker requires installation of Docker Engine and Docker Compose on the host machine, whereas Laravel Homestead requires installation of Vagrant and VirtualBox. Docker's installation process is more streamlined and easier compared to Laravel Homestead.

2. Operating System Compatibility: Docker can run on various operating systems including Linux, Windows, and macOS, making it highly compatible. On the other hand, Laravel Homestead is primarily designed for macOS and Linux, limiting its compatibility on Windows machines.