Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Dojo

559
92
+ 1
1
jQuery

190.5K
67.1K
+ 1
6.6K
Add tool

Dojo vs jQuery: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Templating - Dojo provides a built-in templating system that allows developers to create reusable templates for generating HTML content, while jQuery does not have a native templating system and relies on third-party libraries or plugins for this purpose.

  2. 2. Browser Compatibility - Dojo is known for its robustness and cross-browser compatibility, providing consistent performance across various browsers. On the other hand, jQuery has built-in browser compatibility features that simplify the process of writing code that works well across different browsers.

  3. 3. Size and Performance - jQuery is a lightweight library that is designed to be fast and efficient, making it suitable for webpages with minimal JavaScript requirements. In contrast, Dojo is a more comprehensive framework that provides a wider range of features and modules, which can impact its file size and overall performance.

  4. 4. Event Handling - Dojo utilizes a powerful event system that enables fine-grained control over handling and listening to different events. jQuery also offers event handling capabilities but with a different syntax and approach, emphasizing simplicity and ease of use.

  5. 5. Animation and Effects - jQuery excels in providing smooth animations and visual effects through its extensive set of built-in animation methods. Dojo, on the other hand, provides a more limited set of animation features, focusing on functionality rather than extensive visual effects.

  6. 6. Community and Ecosystem - Both Dojo and jQuery have active communities and ecosystems, but the size and scope differ. jQuery has a larger community due to its popularity and widespread adoption, resulting in a vast number of third-party plugins and resources. Dojo has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on maintaining and evolving the framework, with a lesser number of third-party resources available.

In Summary, Dojo and jQuery differ in their templating capabilities, browser compatibility, size and performance, event handling, animation and effects, as well as the size and scope of their respective communities and ecosystems.

Decisions about Dojo and jQuery
Malek Boubakri
Web developer at Quicktext · | 0 upvote · 213.8K views

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

See more
kazi shahin
CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd. · | 3 upvotes · 103.6K views

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

See more
Manatsawin Hanmongkolchai
Chose
jQueryjQuery
over
ReactReact
in

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Dojo
Pros of jQuery
  • 1
    Good for very complex forms
  • 1.3K
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
  • 459
    Easy
  • 395
    Popular
  • 350
    Feature-rich
  • 281
    Html5
  • 227
    Light weight
  • 93
    Simple
  • 84
    Great community
  • 79
    CSS3 Compliant
  • 69
    Mobile friendly
  • 67
    Fast
  • 43
    Intuitive
  • 42
    Swiss Army knife for webdev
  • 35
    Huge Community
  • 11
    Easy to learn
  • 4
    Clean code
  • 3
    Because of Ajax request :)
  • 2
    Powerful
  • 2
    Nice
  • 2
    Just awesome
  • 2
    Used everywhere
  • 1
    Improves productivity
  • 1
    Javascript
  • 1
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
  • 1
    It Just Works
  • 1
    Industry acceptance
  • 1
    Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
  • 1
    Widely Used
  • 1
    I love jQuery

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Dojo
Cons of jQuery
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 6
      Large size
    • 5
      Sometimes inconsistent API
    • 5
      Encourages DOM as primary data source
    • 2
      Live events is overly complex feature

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Dojo?

    It is a JavaScript toolkit that saves you time and scales with your development process. Provides everything you need to build a Web app. Language utilities, UI components, and more, all in one place, designed to work together perfectly.

    What is jQuery?

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Dojo?
    What companies use jQuery?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Dojo or jQuery.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Dojo?
    What tools integrate with jQuery?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Dojo and jQuery?
    Seesaw
    Seesaw v2 is a Linux Virtual Server (LVS) based load balancing platform. It is capable of providing basic load balancing for servers that are on the same network, through to advanced load balancing functionality such as anycast, Direct Server Return (DSR), support for multiple VLANs and centralised configuration.
    AngularJS
    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    Bootstrap
    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.
    JavaScript
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    See all alternatives