Dojo vs jQuery

Overview

jQuery

Stacks195.3K

Followers70.6K

Votes6.6K

GitHub Stars59.6K

Forks20.5K

Dojo

Stacks568

Followers96

Votes1

Dojo vs jQuery: What are the differences?

1. Templating - Dojo provides a built-in templating system that allows developers to create reusable templates for generating HTML content, while jQuery does not have a native templating system and relies on third-party libraries or plugins for this purpose.
2. Browser Compatibility - Dojo is known for its robustness and cross-browser compatibility, providing consistent performance across various browsers. On the other hand, jQuery has built-in browser compatibility features that simplify the process of writing code that works well across different browsers.
3. Size and Performance - jQuery is a lightweight library that is designed to be fast and efficient, making it suitable for webpages with minimal JavaScript requirements. In contrast, Dojo is a more comprehensive framework that provides a wider range of features and modules, which can impact its file size and overall performance.
4. Event Handling - Dojo utilizes a powerful event system that enables fine-grained control over handling and listening to different events. jQuery also offers event handling capabilities but with a different syntax and approach, emphasizing simplicity and ease of use.
5. Animation and Effects - jQuery excels in providing smooth animations and visual effects through its extensive set of built-in animation methods. Dojo, on the other hand, provides a more limited set of animation features, focusing on functionality rather than extensive visual effects.
6. Community and Ecosystem - Both Dojo and jQuery have active communities and ecosystems, but the size and scope differ. jQuery has a larger community due to its popularity and widespread adoption, resulting in a vast number of third-party plugins and resources. Dojo has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on maintaining and evolving the framework, with a lesser number of third-party resources available.

In Summary, Dojo and jQuery differ in their templating capabilities, browser compatibility, size and performance, event handling, animation and effects, as well as the size and scope of their respective communities and ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on jQuery, Dojo

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

kazi

CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd.

Mar 11, 2020

Decided

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source.
So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

115k views115k

Comments

Manatsawin

Jan 19, 2020

Decided

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

225k views225k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

jQuery	Dojo
jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.	It is a JavaScript toolkit that saves you time and scales with your development process. Provides everything you need to build a Web app. Language utilities, UI components, and more, all in one place, designed to work together perfectly.
-	Breadth and Depth: Dojo is the “full stack”;Quality: Infrastructure for internationalization and accessibility is woven through the entire fabric of Dojo;Performance: Dojo is used on high-profile, high-traffic sites every day and Dojo's build tools are a key reason why;Community: Dojo is an open community.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 20.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 195.3K	Stacks 568
Followers 70.6K	Followers 96
Votes 6.6K	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 1263 Cross-browser 957 Dom manipulation 809 Power 660 Open source 610 Plugins Cons 6 Large size 5 Encourages DOM as primary data source 5 Sometimes inconsistent API 2 Live events is overly complex feature	Pros 1 Good for very complex forms
Integrations
No integrations available	AngularJS JavaScript TypeScript

What are some alternatives to jQuery, Dojo?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Related Comparisons

Dojo vs jQuery: What are the differences?

1. Templating - Dojo provides a built-in templating system that allows developers to create reusable templates for generating HTML content, while jQuery does not have a native templating system and relies on third-party libraries or plugins for this purpose.
2. Browser Compatibility - Dojo is known for its robustness and cross-browser compatibility, providing consistent performance across various browsers. On the other hand, jQuery has built-in browser compatibility features that simplify the process of writing code that works well across different browsers.
3. Size and Performance - jQuery is a lightweight library that is designed to be fast and efficient, making it suitable for webpages with minimal JavaScript requirements. In contrast, Dojo is a more comprehensive framework that provides a wider range of features and modules, which can impact its file size and overall performance.
4. Event Handling - Dojo utilizes a powerful event system that enables fine-grained control over handling and listening to different events. jQuery also offers event handling capabilities but with a different syntax and approach, emphasizing simplicity and ease of use.
5. Animation and Effects - jQuery excels in providing smooth animations and visual effects through its extensive set of built-in animation methods. Dojo, on the other hand, provides a more limited set of animation features, focusing on functionality rather than extensive visual effects.
6. Community and Ecosystem - Both Dojo and jQuery have active communities and ecosystems, but the size and scope differ. jQuery has a larger community due to its popularity and widespread adoption, resulting in a vast number of third-party plugins and resources. Dojo has a smaller but dedicated community that focuses on maintaining and evolving the framework, with a lesser number of third-party resources available.

Dojo vs jQuery

Overview