StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. File Storage
  5. Dropbox vs Storj

Dropbox vs Storj

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Dropbox
Dropbox
Stacks23.5K
Followers18.4K
Votes1.7K
Storj
Storj
Stacks23
Followers41
Votes23
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Dropbox vs Storj: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Dropbox and Storj are both cloud storage services that offer users the ability to store and access their data securely online. While they have similarities, there are key differences between the two platforms that users should consider before choosing one over the other.

1. **Storage Infrastructure**: Dropbox uses a centralized storage infrastructure, where data is stored on the company's own servers. In contrast, Storj utilizes a decentralized cloud storage network, utilizing unused storage space on participants' devices who are rewarded for sharing their storage capacity, offering a more cost-effective and scalable solution.

2. **Data Security**: Dropbox relies on encryption to secure data during transfer and storage, with users trusting the company's security measures. Storj, on the other hand, employs client-side encryption, where data is encrypted on the user's device before being uploaded, giving users complete control over their encryption keys and ensuring privacy.

3. **Access Control**: In Dropbox, users can set access permissions at the folder level, allowing collaboration with others by sharing specific folders. Storj, however, does not support granular access controls within the platform, making it less suitable for collaborative projects that require strict access restrictions.

4. **Cost Structure**: While Dropbox offers a straightforward pricing model based on storage space and additional features, Storj differentiates itself by offering a pay-as-you-go model based on usage and network availability. This can potentially result in cost savings for users with fluctuating storage needs.

5. **Performance and Speed**: Dropbox typically offers faster upload and download speeds due to its centralized infrastructure and optimized data transfer protocols. Storj's performance, on the other hand, may vary depending on the network and storage nodes available at any given time, potentially affecting speed and reliability.

6. **Community and Support**: Dropbox provides dedicated customer support and a large community of users, making it easier to find help and resources. Storj, being a decentralized platform, relies more on community support and may have limited official support channels, which could pose challenges for users in need of immediate assistance.

In Summary, Dropbox and Storj differ in their storage infrastructure, data security approach, access control, cost structure, performance, and community support, offering users a choice between centralized reliability and decentralized flexibility in their cloud storage solutions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Dropbox
Dropbox
Storj
Storj

Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

Dropbox Chooser- Get files from Dropbox into your web app with just a few lines of JavaScript;Sync API- Read and write to Dropbox from iOS & Android as if it were a local filesystem;Core API- The basics. Upload, download, search, and more from your web or mobile app
Performance; Security & Privacy; Durability; Open Source; Affordable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
23.5K
Stacks
23
Followers
18.4K
Followers
41
Votes
1.7K
Votes
23
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 434
    Easy to work with
  • 256
    Free
  • 216
    Popular
  • 176
    Shared file hosting
  • 167
    'just works'
Cons
  • 3
    Personal vs company account is confusing
  • 1
    Replication kills CPU and battery
Pros
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 3
    Decentralized
  • 2
    Security & Privacy
  • 2
    Easy Setup
  • 2
    Durability
Integrations
Formstack
Formstack
Squarespace
Squarespace
Trello
Trello
LiveChat
LiveChat
RightSignature
RightSignature
Asana
Asana
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Apache CloudStack
Apache CloudStack
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront

What are some alternatives to Dropbox, Storj?

Google Drive

Google Drive

Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Box

Box

The Box API gives you access to the content management features you see in our web app and lets you extend them for use in your own app. It strives to be RESTful and is organized around the main resources you’re familiar with from the Box web interface.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase