Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Elixir vs Gleam: What are the differences?
Introduction
Elixir and Gleam are both programming languages that are known for their capabilities in building reliable and scalable systems. While they may share some similarities, there are key differences between them that set them apart in terms of syntax, features, and ecosystem.
Syntax: The syntax of Elixir is heavily influenced by Ruby, with a focus on readability and expressiveness. Gleam, on the other hand, borrows from languages like Rust and Haskell, emphasizing on type safety and functional programming concepts. While Elixir uses a dynamic type system, Gleam introduces static typing to ensure compile-time safety.
Concurrency: Elixir has built-in support for concurrency with its lightweight processes, known as actors, and its ability to handle millions of concurrent connections. It utilizes the actor model for message passing and offers robust abstractions for handling concurrent tasks. Gleam, however, relies on the concept of immutability and pure functions to achieve safe concurrency, avoiding the need for processes like Elixir's actors.
Ecosystem: Elixir has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of libraries and frameworks, such as Phoenix for web development and Ecto for database interactions. It also benefits from seamless integration with existing Erlang libraries. Gleam, on the other hand, is a relatively new language with a growing ecosystem, but it benefits from leveraging the Rust ecosystem for performance-critical tasks.
Metaprogramming: Elixir is known for its powerful metaprogramming capabilities, allowing developers to dynamically modify the language and generate code at runtime. This feature empowers the development of domain-specific languages and powerful abstractions. Gleam, however, does not support metaprogramming, focusing on strong static typing and compile-time safety.
Tooling: Elixir has a rich set of development tools, including a built-in test framework (ExUnit), a package manager (Hex), a code formatter (mix format), and a documentation generator (ExDoc). It also benefits from the supportive community and abundant learning resources. Gleam, being a statically-typed language, relies on the Rust tooling ecosystem, leveraging tools like Cargo for package management and Rust Analyzer for IDE integration.
Garbage Collection: Elixir relies on the BEAM virtual machine's garbage collection mechanism, which employs a highly efficient and concurrent garbage collector. On the other hand, Gleam compiles to native code using the Rust compiler, benefiting from Rust's approach to memory management, which includes ownership, borrowing, and lifetimes.
In summary, Elixir and Gleam differ in their syntax, concurrency models, ecosystems, metaprogramming capabilities, tooling, and garbage collection mechanisms. Elixir emphasizes readability and scalability while providing dynamic typing and metaprogramming, whereas Gleam focuses on static typing, type safety, and leveraging the Rust ecosystem for performance-critical tasks.
Pros of Elixir
- Concurrency174
- Functional162
- Erlang vm133
- Great documentation113
- Great tooling105
- Immutable data structures87
- Open source81
- Pattern-matching77
- Easy to get started62
- Actor library59
- Functional with a neat syntax32
- Ruby inspired29
- Erlang evolved25
- Homoiconic24
- Beauty of Ruby, Speed of Erlang/C22
- Fault Tolerant17
- Simple14
- High Performance13
- Doc as first class citizen11
- Good lang11
- Pipe Operator11
- Stinkin' fast, no memory leaks, easy on the eyes9
- Fun to write9
- OTP8
- Resilient to failure8
- GenServer takes the guesswork out of background work6
- Pattern matching4
- Not Swift4
- Idempotence4
- Fast, Concurrent with clean error messages4
- Easy to use3
- Dynamic Typing2
- Error isolation2
Pros of Gleam
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Elixir
- Fewer jobs for Elixir experts11
- Smaller userbase than other mainstream languages7
- Elixir's dot notation less readable ("object": 1st arg)5
- Dynamic typing4
- Difficult to understand2
- Not a lot of learning books available1