Filestack vs tus.io

Overview

Filestack

Stacks85

Followers114

Votes4

tus.io

Stacks11

Followers31

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.7K

Forks108

Filestack vs tus.io: What are the differences?

Integration and Use Cases: Filestack is mainly a file uploading and management service that offers various integrations like Dropbox, Facebook, etc., making it versatile for different use cases. On the other hand, tus.io focuses solely on enabling resumable file uploads to servers, providing a more specialized solution for large file transfers and robust upload functionalities.
Client-Side Implementation: Filestack provides easy-to-use client-side libraries for various programming languages, which simplifies the integration process for developers. Compared to this, tus.io requires the implementation of the tus protocol on the client-side, which may involve more technical knowledge and effort from the development team.
Customization and Control: Filestack offers extensive customization options for file uploading UI/UX, security settings, and processing workflows, allowing users to tailor the service according to their specific needs. In contrast, tus.io focuses more on the core functionality of reliable upload handling, with fewer built-in options for customization beyond the uploading process itself.
Cost and Pricing Structure: Filestack follows a subscription-based pricing model that includes various tiers based on usage, storage, and additional features. In contrast, tus.io is an open-source project that can be implemented without any direct cost, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking to manage file uploads without additional expenses.
Community and Support: Filestack has a dedicated support team and a large community of users, providing resources, tutorials, and documentation to assist users in integrating and optimizing their file handling processes. On the other hand, tus.io relies more on its open-source community for support, which may offer less immediate assistance but fosters collaboration and shared development efforts among users and contributors.
Security and Compliance: Filestack offers various security features such as encryption, access control, and compliance certifications to ensure data protection and regulatory adherence for sensitive file uploads. In comparison, tus.io focuses on the technical aspects of secure file transfer without extensive built-in security measures, requiring organizations to implement additional security protocols based on their specific requirements.

In Summary, Filestack and tus.io differ in terms of integration, client-side implementation, customization, pricing, community support, and security features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Filestack	tus.io
Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet.	Open protocol for resumable file uploads
Connect your app to everything from Dropbox to Gmail in just 2 lines of code and let Filepicker.io handle the mess of uploading files - we give you a clean, short URL that is easy to store and read from.;Your files are stored in your existing S3 bucket. We handle all the complicated javascript and backend APIs to give you a clean and elegant way of saving files directly to your S3 bucket.;To make it even easier to work with user content, we enable image post-processing. This way, regardless of what type of file a user uploads from the Cloud or their local device, you can be sure it's in exactly the right size. To convert an image, take the filepicker url and append /convert, along with query parameters specifying what you want to change.;Pick Widget (supports Box, Computer, Dropbox, Evernote, Facebook, Flickr, FTP, GitHub, Google Drive, Skydrive, Picasa, Gmail, Instagram);Drag-Drop Widget;Export Widget;Drag-Drop Pane;Custom Logo and CSS;Multiple Administrators;Insights and Analytics;99.9% Uptime;Email and Phone Support	HTTP-based;Production-ready;Open source;Minimalistic design;Extensible;Community-owned;Backed by Vimeo & Transloadit
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 1.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 108
Stacks 85	Stacks 11
Followers 114	Followers 31
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 All the sources I need Cons 1 Slow support	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Evernote Facebook OneDrive Box GitHub Google Drive Amazon CloudFront Dropbox	Uppy Transloadit Amazon S3 Google Cloud Storage

What are some alternatives to Filestack, tus.io?

Uploadcare

Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content.

Transloadit

Transloadit handles file uploading & file processing for your websites and mobile apps. We can process video, audio, images and documents.

Bytescale

Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs.

Uppy

Uppy is a sleek modular file uploader for web browsers. Add it to your app with one line of code, or build a custom version with just the plugins you need via Webpack/Browserify. 100% open source, backed by a company (Transloadit).

CarrierWave

This gem provides a simple and extremely flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. It works well with Rack based web applications, such as Ruby on Rails.

Paperclip

It is intended as an easy file attachment library for ActiveRecord. The intent behind it was to keep setup as easy as possible and to treat files as much like other attributes as possible.

FilePond

A JavaScript library that can upload anything you throw at it, optimizes images for faster uploads and offers a great, accessible, silky smooth user experience.

Shrine

Shrine implements a plugin system analogous to Roda’s and Sequel’s. Shrine ships with over 25 plugins, which together provide a great arsenal of features. Where CarrierWave and other file upload libraries favor complex class-level DSLs, Shrine favours simple instance-level interface.

CameraTag

With one line of code you can easily start collecting videos for applications ranging from video-comments to talent competitions, political action, virtual interviews, talent scouting and more.<br>

Flatfile

The drop-in data importer that implements in hours, not weeks. Give your users the import experience you always dreamed of, but never had time to build.

Related Comparisons

Filestack vs tus.io: What are the differences?

Integration and Use Cases: Filestack is mainly a file uploading and management service that offers various integrations like Dropbox, Facebook, etc., making it versatile for different use cases. On the other hand, tus.io focuses solely on enabling resumable file uploads to servers, providing a more specialized solution for large file transfers and robust upload functionalities.
Client-Side Implementation: Filestack provides easy-to-use client-side libraries for various programming languages, which simplifies the integration process for developers. Compared to this, tus.io requires the implementation of the tus protocol on the client-side, which may involve more technical knowledge and effort from the development team.
Customization and Control: Filestack offers extensive customization options for file uploading UI/UX, security settings, and processing workflows, allowing users to tailor the service according to their specific needs. In contrast, tus.io focuses more on the core functionality of reliable upload handling, with fewer built-in options for customization beyond the uploading process itself.
Cost and Pricing Structure: Filestack follows a subscription-based pricing model that includes various tiers based on usage, storage, and additional features. In contrast, tus.io is an open-source project that can be implemented without any direct cost, making it a more budget-friendly option for organizations looking to manage file uploads without additional expenses.
Community and Support: Filestack has a dedicated support team and a large community of users, providing resources, tutorials, and documentation to assist users in integrating and optimizing their file handling processes. On the other hand, tus.io relies more on its open-source community for support, which may offer less immediate assistance but fosters collaboration and shared development efforts among users and contributors.
Security and Compliance: Filestack offers various security features such as encryption, access control, and compliance certifications to ensure data protection and regulatory adherence for sensitive file uploads. In comparison, tus.io focuses on the technical aspects of secure file transfer without extensive built-in security measures, requiring organizations to implement additional security protocols based on their specific requirements.

In Summary, Filestack and tus.io differ in terms of integration, client-side implementation, customization, pricing, community support, and security features.

Filestack vs tus.io

Overview