StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Firebase Hosting vs Heroku

Firebase Hosting vs Heroku

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
Firebase Hosting
Firebase Hosting
Stacks181
Followers180
Votes10

Firebase Hosting vs Heroku: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Firebase Hosting and Heroku are two popular platforms for hosting web applications. While they both provide hosting services, there are key differences between the two that make each suitable for different use cases.

1. **Deployment Process**: Firebase Hosting offers a simpler deployment process, where you can deploy your static content or cloud functions directly from the Firebase CLI with a single command. On the other hand, Heroku requires you to create a Git repository and push your code to it to deploy your application.

2. **Scalability**: Heroku allows for horizontal scaling by adding more dynos (containers) to handle increased load, making it suitable for applications that require dynamic scaling. In contrast, Firebase Hosting is more limited in terms of scalability and may not be as suitable for applications with rapidly changing traffic patterns.

3. **Database Integration**: Heroku allows you to easily integrate with a wide range of databases, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB. Firebase Hosting, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with Firebase Realtime Database and Firestore, making it easier to build real-time applications with these databases.

4. **Cost Structure**: Firebase Hosting has a simpler and more predictable pricing structure, where you pay only for the resources you use. Heroku, on the other hand, can be more expensive for larger applications due to its usage-based pricing model and the cost of dynos and add-ons.

5. **Programming Languages**: Heroku supports a wide range of programming languages, including Node.js, Ruby, Python, and Java, allowing you to choose the language that best suits your application. Firebase Hosting, on the other hand, is more focused on JavaScript and integrates seamlessly with other Firebase services.

6. **Server Management**: With Heroku, you have more control over the server environment and can install additional libraries and dependencies as needed. Firebase Hosting abstracts server management away, making it easier to deploy and manage your application without worrying about server configurations.

In Summary, Firebase Hosting is more suitable for simple deployments and real-time applications with Firebase databases, while Heroku offers more flexibility in terms of scaling, database integration, and server management for larger and more complex applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Heroku, Firebase Hosting

Amr
Amr

Computer Science student at DCSIL

Feb 4, 2020

Needs advice

React:

  1. Constantly being developed.
  2. One of the top 3 commonly used front-end frameworks.
  3. Fits the team’s skills.

Python:

  1. Very common for ML/Data Science work.
  2. Can easily build a web server and a ML pipeline in the same application.
  3. One of the most commonly used languages, will be great for recruiting developers in the future.

Heroku: Firebase Hosting is static, and thereby does not allow Python jobs to run. Since these are batch jobs that run more infrequently and do not directly face the user, Heroku is a great fit considering the free tier offers all the features we need.

Flask:

  1. Easy to set up, does not have too much boilerplate code.
  2. Our API will be very simple so we chose Flask over Django, which has MVC features that we don’t need.

Firebase Hosting:

  1. We will use Firebase Hosting for our React client's server since it needs to be up all the time as opposed to hibernating (e.g. like in Heroku)
  2. It includes a CDN for free, out of the box, so it would help with performance.
16.5k views16.5k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
Firebase Hosting
Firebase Hosting

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
-
Statistics
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
181
Followers
20.5K
Followers
180
Votes
3.2K
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 7
    Storage
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
Pros
  • 4
    Integration with firebase
  • 1
    Analytics
  • 1
    Free SSL Support
  • 1
    Custom domain setup
  • 1
    Easy deployment
Cons
  • 1
    .env complexity
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Firebase Hosting?

GitHub Pages

GitHub Pages

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase