Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Firebase Hosting vs Heroku: What are the differences?
## Introduction
Firebase Hosting and Heroku are two popular platforms for hosting web applications. While they both provide hosting services, there are key differences between the two that make each suitable for different use cases.
1. **Deployment Process**: Firebase Hosting offers a simpler deployment process, where you can deploy your static content or cloud functions directly from the Firebase CLI with a single command. On the other hand, Heroku requires you to create a Git repository and push your code to it to deploy your application.
2. **Scalability**: Heroku allows for horizontal scaling by adding more dynos (containers) to handle increased load, making it suitable for applications that require dynamic scaling. In contrast, Firebase Hosting is more limited in terms of scalability and may not be as suitable for applications with rapidly changing traffic patterns.
3. **Database Integration**: Heroku allows you to easily integrate with a wide range of databases, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB. Firebase Hosting, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with Firebase Realtime Database and Firestore, making it easier to build real-time applications with these databases.
4. **Cost Structure**: Firebase Hosting has a simpler and more predictable pricing structure, where you pay only for the resources you use. Heroku, on the other hand, can be more expensive for larger applications due to its usage-based pricing model and the cost of dynos and add-ons.
5. **Programming Languages**: Heroku supports a wide range of programming languages, including Node.js, Ruby, Python, and Java, allowing you to choose the language that best suits your application. Firebase Hosting, on the other hand, is more focused on JavaScript and integrates seamlessly with other Firebase services.
6. **Server Management**: With Heroku, you have more control over the server environment and can install additional libraries and dependencies as needed. Firebase Hosting abstracts server management away, making it easier to deploy and manage your application without worrying about server configurations.
In Summary, Firebase Hosting is more suitable for simple deployments and real-time applications with Firebase databases, while Heroku offers more flexibility in terms of scaling, database integration, and server management for larger and more complex applications.
React
:
1. Constantly being developed.
2. One of the top 3 commonly used front-end frameworks.
3. Fits the team’s skills.
Python
:
1. Very common for ML/Data Science work.
2. Can easily build a web server and a ML pipeline in the same application.
3. One of the most commonly used languages, will be great for recruiting developers in the future.
Heroku
:
Firebase Hosting is static, and thereby does not allow Python jobs to run. Since these are batch jobs that run more infrequently and do not directly face the user, Heroku is a great fit considering the free tier offers all the features we need.
Flask
:
1. Easy to set up, does not have too much boilerplate code.
2. Our API will be very simple so we chose Flask over Django, which has MVC features that we don’t need.
Firebase Hosting
:
1. We will use Firebase Hosting for our React client's server since it needs to be up all the time as opposed to hibernating (e.g. like in Heroku)
2. It includes a CDN for free, out of the box, so it would help with performance.
Pros of Firebase Hosting
- Integration with firebase4
- Multi-site hosting support1
- Custom domain setup1
- Free SSL Support1
- Analytics1
- Super simple deploys1
- Easy deployment1
Pros of Heroku
- Easy deployment703
- Free for side projects459
- Huge time-saver374
- Simple scaling348
- Low devops skills required261
- Easy setup190
- Add-ons for almost everything174
- Beginner friendly153
- Better for startups150
- Low learning curve133
- Postgres hosting48
- Easy to add collaborators41
- Faster development30
- Awesome documentation24
- Simple rollback19
- Focus on product, not deployment19
- Natural companion for rails development15
- Easy integration15
- Great customer support12
- GitHub integration8
- Painless & well documented6
- No-ops6
- I love that they make it free to launch a side project4
- Free4
- Great UI3
- Just works3
- PostgreSQL forking and following2
- MySQL extension2
- Security1
- Able to host stuff good like Discord Bot1
- Sec0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Firebase Hosting
- .env complexity1
Cons of Heroku
- Super expensive27
- Not a whole lot of flexibility9
- No usable MySQL option7
- Storage7
- Low performance on free tier5
- 24/7 support is $1,000 per month2