Pros of Firecamp

• 6

  WebSocket testing
• 3

  OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, RAML and more
• 2

  Auto detect GraphQL query variables
• 2

  Query Collection
• 2

  GraphQL File Upload
• 2

  Easy testing for Socket.io/HTTP/WebSocket/GraphQL
• 2

  Environment Snippets like Development, Production
• 2

  Import/Export Firecamp Project or any Specs
• 1

  Easy to use

Pros of Postman

• 488

  Easy to use
• 368

  Great tool
• 275

  Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
• 155

  Easy setup, looks good
• 143

  The best api workflow out there
• 53

  History feature
• 53

  It's the best
• 44

  Adds real value to my workflow
• 42

  Great interface that magically predicts your needs
• 34

  The best in class app
• 11

  Can save and share script
• 9

  Fully featured without looking cluttered
• 7

  Collections
• 7

  Option to run scrips
• 7

  Global/Environment Variables
• 6

  Dead simple and useful. Excellent
• 6

  Shareable Collections
• 6

  Dark theme easy on the eyes
• 5

  Awesome customer support
• 5

  Great integration with newman
• 4

  Simple
• 4

  The test script is useful
• 4

  Documentation
• 3

  Easy as pie
• 3

  Saves responses
• 3

  Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
• 3

  This has simplified my testing significantly
• 2

  API-network
• 2

  I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
• 2

  Mocking API calls with predefined response
• 1

  Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
• 1

  Graph
• 1

  Postman Runner CI Integration
• 1

  Now supports GraphQL
• 1

  Continuous integration using newman
• 1

  Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
• 0

  <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
• 0

  Runner

Cons of Firecamp

Cons of Postman

• 9

  Bloated features and UI
• 9

  Stores credentials in HTTP
• 8

  Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
• 7

  Poor GraphQL support
• 5

  Expensive
• 3

  Can't prompt for per-request variables
• 3

  Not free after 5 users
• 1

  Import curl
• 1

  Import swagger
• 1

  Support websocket