StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Firecamp vs Postman

Firecamp vs Postman

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Postman
Postman
Stacks96.5K
Followers82.5K
Votes1.8K
Forks0
Firecamp
Firecamp
Stacks5
Followers19
Votes22
GitHub Stars61
Forks4

Firecamp vs Postman: What are the differences?

Firecamp and Postman are both popular API development tools that aid developers in designing, testing, and managing APIs. Let's explore the key differences between Firecamp and Postman:

  1. User Interface and Accessibility: Firecamp is a browser-based API client, which means it can be accessed directly from a web browser without the need for any installation or setup. This makes it a convenient choice for quick testing and collaboration, especially for remote teams. On the other hand, Postman is a desktop application that requires installation on the user's local machine. While it provides a robust and feature-rich environment for API testing and development, it may require more effort to set up across different devices.

  2. Collaboration and Team Management: Firecamp offers a built-in team collaboration feature that enables developers to share APIs, collections, and workspaces with their team members, facilitating real-time collaboration and enhancing productivity. In contrast, Postman emphasizes team collaboration through its Postman Cloud platform. It allows users to share APIs, collections, and environments with team members, enabling seamless collaboration across distributed teams. Postman also provides team-based access control and role management for enhanced security and governance.

  3. Customizability and Extensions: Firecamp is known for its extensibility and customizability, offering a range of extensions and integrations with popular development tools and services. Developers can create custom plugins to tailor the tool to their specific needs and integrate it with other platforms in their tech stack. On the other hand, while Postman provides some level of extensibility through its Postman Interceptor and custom scripts, it does not offer the same level of flexibility and customizability as Firecamp.

  4. Pricing and Plans: Firecamp offers a free version with limited features, making it an attractive option for individual developers and small teams with basic requirements. It also provides affordable paid plans for teams with advanced features and additional capabilities. Postman, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive free version with generous usage limits, making it a popular choice for developers and small teams. It also provides various paid plans with additional features, such as team collaboration, API monitoring, and advanced analytics.

  5. Learning Curve and Ease of Use: Firecamp is often praised for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it a suitable choice for developers of all skill levels, including beginners. Its intuitive design and browser-based access simplify the onboarding process. Postman, while still user-friendly, may have a slightly steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive set of features and desktop application-based interface. However, experienced developers may appreciate the depth of functionality and control it offers.

In summary, Firecamp's browser-based accessibility, customizability, and real-time collaboration make it ideal for teams seeking a flexible and user-friendly API development tool. Postman's feature-rich desktop application, generous free version, and robust team collaboration platform cater to teams looking for a comprehensive API development and testing solution with advanced functionality and strong team collaboration capabilities.

Advice on Postman, Firecamp

Jagdeep
Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

ReviewonPostmanPostman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

410k views410k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k
Comments
Stephen
Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Postman
Postman
Firecamp
Firecamp

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Firecamp is a centralized platform to test/manage/collaborate on HTTP, GraphQL, WS and other forms of APIs in a Team.

Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud
Save queries, mutations, and subscriptions in a collection for future purposes; Generate queries on the fly without having a knowledge of prior schema. just click and generate; Get auto-generated variables from queries very quickly; Upload single or multiple files at a time with just a couple of clicks; Get a zero-maintenance document from the GraphQL schema, never be out of sync
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
61
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
4
Stacks
96.5K
Stacks
5
Followers
82.5K
Followers
19
Votes
1.8K
Votes
22
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
Cons
  • 10
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
Pros
  • 6
    WebSocket testing
  • 3
    OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, RAML and more
  • 2
    Environment Snippets like Development, Production
  • 2
    Import/Export Firecamp Project or any Specs
  • 2
    Query Collection
Integrations
HipChat
HipChat
Keen
Keen
Slack
Slack
Dropbox
Dropbox
Datadog
Datadog
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Bigpanda
Bigpanda
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Newman
Newman
VictorOps
VictorOps
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Postman, Firecamp?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase