StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Flask vs Gunicorn

Flask vs Gunicorn

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Stacks1.3K
Followers908
Votes78
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks1.8K

Flask vs Gunicorn: What are the differences?

Flask vs Gunicorn

Flask and Gunicorn are both popular frameworks used in web development, but they have key differences in terms of their functionality and performance.

  1. Deployment Approach: Flask is a micro web framework that is often used as a development server, suitable for small applications or prototypes. On the other hand, Gunicorn is a production-ready WSGI server that is designed to handle heavy traffic and high loads, making it better suited for large-scale applications.

  2. Concurrency Model: Flask runs in a single process, which means it can only handle one request at a time. Gunicorn, on the other hand, uses a pre-fork worker model, allowing it to handle multiple requests concurrently. This makes Gunicorn more efficient in handling simultaneous requests and improves the overall performance of the application.

  3. Scalability: Due to its single process nature, Flask may struggle to handle a high volume of concurrent requests, leading to potential bottlenecks and slower response times. Gunicorn, with its ability to handle multiple requests concurrently, is better equipped to handle scalability and can scale horizontally by adding more worker processes when needed.

  4. Load-balancing: While Flask does not provide built-in load-balancing capabilities, Gunicorn can be easily configured to work with a load balancer like Nginx. This allows requests to be distributed across multiple instances of Gunicorn running on different servers, ensuring better distribution of load and improved performance.

  5. HTTP Server Features: Flask does not include built-in support for handling HTTP server features like HTTP/2, keep-alive connections, and websocket support. In contrast, Gunicorn provides these features out of the box, making it a more suitable choice for applications that require advanced HTTP functionality.

  6. Memory Usage: Flask consumes less memory compared to Gunicorn due to its lightweight design and minimalistic feature set. Gunicorn, being a more robust server, requires more memory to handle its multiple worker processes and additional features.

In summary, Flask is a lightweight micro web framework suitable for small-scale applications, while Gunicorn is a production-ready server that offers better scalability, load-balancing capabilities, and advanced HTTP server features for large-scale applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, Gunicorn

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments
Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
Gunicorn
Gunicorn

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
16.2K
Followers
908
Votes
60
Votes
78
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Light
  • 3
    Fast

What are some alternatives to Flask, Gunicorn?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase