Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Flink vs Redis: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Apache Flink and Redis
Apache Flink and Redis are both popular technologies used in the field of data processing and storage. While they serve different purposes, there are several key differences between the two:
Data Processing vs Data Storage: Apache Flink is a distributed processing framework that focuses on data processing and analysis in real-time or batch mode. It provides powerful stream processing capabilities and supports fault-tolerant, scalable data processing pipelines. On the other hand, Redis is an in-memory data structure store that primarily focuses on data storage and caching. It provides fast read and write operations by keeping data in-memory.
Data Model: Apache Flink operates on a flexible and powerful data model that supports both structured and unstructured data. It provides various APIs and libraries for processing and analyzing data at large scale. Redis, on the other hand, uses a simple key-value data model where data is stored and accessed using keys and values. It also supports additional data structures such as lists, sets, and hashes.
Processing Paradigm: Apache Flink supports both batch and stream processing paradigms, allowing users to process both historical and real-time data. It provides built-in support for event time and out-of-order processing. Redis, on the other hand, is primarily focused on real-time data processing and storage. While it has some support for pub/sub messaging, it is not a dedicated stream processing engine like Apache Flink.
Scalability and Fault Tolerance: Apache Flink is designed to scale horizontally and handle large volumes of data by distributing the processing across multiple machines. It provides fault-tolerance mechanisms like checkpointing and exactly-once semantics for data processing. Redis, on the other hand, can be deployed in a cluster mode to achieve high scalability and availability. It supports replication and sharding to distribute data across multiple nodes.
Persistence: Apache Flink is primarily an in-memory processing engine, but it also provides support for various persistent storages like Apache Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) and cloud-based object stores. It allows users to store and retrieve data for both batch and stream processing. Redis, on the other hand, is an in-memory data store that can optionally persist data to disk. It provides mechanisms like snapshots and persistence modes to ensure data durability.
Use cases: Apache Flink is commonly used for real-time analytics, stream processing, and complex event processing. It finds applications in areas like fraud detection, machine learning, and real-time monitoring. On the other hand, Redis is often used for caching, session storage, message queues, and building real-time applications that require high-speed data access.
In summary, Apache Flink and Redis differ in their focus and capabilities. Apache Flink is a scalable data processing framework for both batch and stream processing, while Redis is an in-memory data storage and caching solution.
We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.
In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.
In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.
The first solution that came to me is to use upsert to update ElasticSearch:
- Use the primary-key as ES document id
- Upsert the records to ES as soon as you receive them. As you are using upsert, the 2nd record of the same primary-key will not overwrite the 1st one, but will be merged with it.
Cons: The load on ES will be higher, due to upsert.
To use Flink:
- Create a KeyedDataStream by the primary-key
- In the ProcessFunction, save the first record in a State. At the same time, create a Timer for 15 minutes in the future
- When the 2nd record comes, read the 1st record from the State, merge those two, and send out the result, and clear the State and the Timer if it has not fired
- When the Timer fires, read the 1st record from the State and send out as the output record.
- Have a 2nd Timer of 6 hours (or more) if you are not using Windowing to clean up the State
Pro: if you have already having Flink ingesting this stream. Otherwise, I would just go with the 1st solution.
Please refer "Structured Streaming" feature of Spark. Refer "Stream - Stream Join" at https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/structured-streaming-programming-guide.html#stream-stream-joins . In short you need to specify "Define watermark delays on both inputs" and "Define a constraint on time across the two inputs"
Pros of Apache Flink
- Unified batch and stream processing16
- Easy to use streaming apis8
- Out-of-the box connector to kinesis,s3,hdfs8
- Open Source4
- Low latency2
Pros of Redis
- Performance887
- Super fast542
- Ease of use514
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable165
- Free156
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Pub/Sub23
- Great community22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- Lists10
- NoSQL10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Bitmaps8
- Open Source7
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Runs server side LUA4
- Transactions4
- Networked4
- Outstanding performance4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Scalable2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache Flink
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1