StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Fluentd vs Prometheus

Fluentd vs Prometheus

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Prometheus
Prometheus
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.8K
Votes239
GitHub Stars61.1K
Forks9.9K
Fluentd
Fluentd
Stacks630
Followers688
Votes39
GitHub Stars13.4K
Forks1.4K

Fluentd vs Prometheus: What are the differences?

Introduction: Fluentd and Prometheus are both popular open-source data collection and monitoring tools used in the field of DevOps. Although they serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between these two tools.

  1. Data Collection Approach: Fluentd is a log collector and aggregator that operates on logs in real-time. It collects logs from various sources, transforms them, and sends them to various destinations for further processing. On the other hand, Prometheus is a time-series database and monitoring system that is primarily used for monitoring and alerting. It collects metrics data from configured targets periodically and stores it for analysis and visualization.

  2. Data Types: Fluentd is more oriented towards collecting and processing unstructured log data. It accepts logs in various formats such as text, JSON, and others. Prometheus, on the other hand, focuses on collecting and analyzing numeric time-series data. It is designed to monitor and analyze metrics related to system performance, resource utilization, and application behavior.

  3. Query Language: Fluentd uses its own query language called Fluent Query Language (FLQL). It allows users to filter and manipulate log data using a SQL-like syntax. Prometheus, on the other hand, uses Prometheus Query Language (PromQL) for querying and analyzing time-series data. PromQL provides a powerful set of operators and functions specifically tailored for time-series analysis.

  4. Monitoring Architecture: Fluentd follows a centralized architecture where logs are collected from various sources and sent to a centralized server for processing and analysis. It provides a unified view of logs across the system. In contrast, Prometheus follows a decentralized architecture where it scrapes metrics data directly from configured targets at regular intervals. Each target maintains its own metrics data, and Prometheus queries these targets individually.

  5. Alerting and Monitoring Capabilities: Fluentd focuses on log aggregation and routing, and does not have built-in support for alerting and monitoring. Prometheus, on the other hand, has powerful alerting and monitoring capabilities. It allows users to define alert rules based on metric conditions and send alerts to various notification channels. It also provides a flexible dashboard for visualizing and analyzing metrics data.

  6. Integration with Ecosystem: Fluentd is highly extensible and can be integrated with various other tools, services, and platforms. It provides plugins for different log sources and destinations, allowing seamless integration with existing infrastructure. Prometheus also has a wide range of integrations with different systems and frameworks. It provides exporters for collecting metrics from various sources and supports integrations with popular monitoring and visualization tools.

**In Summary, Fluentd is a log collector and aggregator that operates on unstructured log data, while Prometheus is a monitoring system that specializes in time-series data analysis and alerting. Fluentd uses FLQL for log querying, follows a centralized architecture, and does not have built-in monitoring capabilities. Prometheus uses PromQL for time-series analysis, follows a decentralized architecture, and provides powerful monitoring and alerting features. Both tools have extensive integrations with different systems and can be used together to create a comprehensive monitoring solution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Prometheus, Fluentd

Leonardo Henrique da
Leonardo Henrique da

Pleno QA Enginneer at SolarMarket

Dec 8, 2020

Decided

The objective of this work was to develop a system to monitor the materials of a production line using IoT technology. Currently, the process of monitoring and replacing parts depends on manual services. For this, load cells, microcontroller, Broker MQTT, Telegraf, InfluxDB, and Grafana were used. It was implemented in a workflow that had the function of collecting sensor data, storing it in a database, and visualizing it in the form of weight and quantity. With these developed solutions, he hopes to contribute to the logistics area, in the replacement and control of materials.

402k views402k
Comments
Raja Subramaniam
Raja Subramaniam

Aug 27, 2019

Needs adviceonPrometheusPrometheusKubernetesKubernetesSysdigSysdig

We have Prometheus as a monitoring engine as a part of our stack which contains Kubernetes cluster, container images and other open source tools. Also, I am aware that Sysdig can be integrated with Prometheus but I really wanted to know whether Sysdig or sysdig+prometheus will make better monitoring solution.

779k views779k
Comments
Susmita
Susmita

Senior SRE at African Bank

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonGrafanaGrafana

Looking for a tool which can be used for mainly dashboard purposes, but here are the main requirements:

  • Must be able to get custom data from AS400,
  • Able to display automation test results,
  • System monitoring / Nginx API,
  • Able to get data from 3rd parties DB.

Grafana is almost solving all the problems, except AS400 and no database to get automation test results.

869k views869k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Prometheus
Prometheus
Fluentd
Fluentd

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

Dimensional data; Powerful queries; Great visualization; Efficient storage; Precise alerting; Simple operation
Open source; Flexible; Minimum resources; Reliable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
61.1K
GitHub Stars
13.4K
GitHub Forks
9.9K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
4.8K
Stacks
630
Followers
3.8K
Followers
688
Votes
239
Votes
39
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 47
    Powerful easy to use monitoring
  • 38
    Flexible query language
  • 32
    Dimensional data model
  • 27
    Alerts
  • 23
    Active and responsive community
Cons
  • 12
    Just for metrics
  • 6
    Needs monitoring to access metrics endpoints
  • 6
    Bad UI
  • 4
    Not easy to configure and use
  • 3
    Supports only active agents
Pros
  • 11
    Open-source
  • 10
    Great for Kubernetes node container log forwarding
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Easy
Integrations
Grafana
Grafana
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Prometheus, Fluentd?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Papertrail

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Logmatic

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Logentries

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Graylog

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana