Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Fluentd

601
689
+ 1
38
Telegraf

280
319
+ 1
16
Add tool

Fluentd vs Telegraf: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Fluentd and Telegraf - two popular data collection and processing tools commonly used in website development.

1. Log Collection Approach:

Fluentd uses a tag-based approach for log collection, where each log entry is tagged with a specific identifier before being processed and stored. On the other hand, Telegraf follows a plugin-based approach, where different plugins are used to capture and process logs from various sources. This allows for more flexibility in log collection methods.

2. Supported Integrations:

Fluentd supports a wide range of plugins and integrations, making it suitable for collecting logs from diverse sources such as applications, databases, and operating systems. Telegraf, on the other hand, primarily focuses on system-level metrics and infrastructure monitoring. While it does offer some plugins for custom integrations, its support may not be as extensive as Fluentd.

3. Ease of Configuration:

Fluentd provides a flexible configuration file format that allows users to define complex log routing and processing rules. It offers a declarative approach where configurations can be defined as YAML files. On the contrary, Telegraf utilizes a simpler configuration file format based on the TOML syntax, which may be easier for beginners to understand and configure.

4. Performance and Resource Consumption:

Fluentd is known for its high resource consumption due to its Ruby-based nature, which can impact the performance of systems with large data volumes. Telegraf, written in Go, is considered more lightweight and efficient in terms of resource usage. This makes it suitable for environments where optimum performance and minimal resource footprint are crucial.

5. Ease of Scalability:

Considering scalability, Fluentd supports a distributed architecture where multiple instances can be connected to form a cluster, enabling horizontal scaling to handle high data volumes. Telegraf, on the other hand, follows a more centralized approach and requires users to rely on external tools (e.g., InfluxDB) for scalability and high availability.

6. Community and Ecosystem:

Both Fluentd and Telegraf have active communities and ecosystems. Fluentd has been around for a longer time and has a larger number of plugins and community-contributed resources available. Telegraf, being part of the larger TICK Stack (Telegraf, InfluxDB, Chronograf, Kapacitor), benefits from the overall ecosystem, providing additional capabilities for time-series data analysis.

In Summary, Fluentd and Telegraf differ in log collection approach, supported integrations, configuration ease, performance/resource consumption, scalability, and community/ecosystem size.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Fluentd
Pros of Telegraf
  • 11
    Open-source
  • 9
    Easy
  • 9
    Great for Kubernetes node container log forwarding
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 5
    One agent can work as multiple exporter with min hndlng
  • 5
    Cohesioned stack for monitoring
  • 2
    Open Source
  • 2
    Metrics
  • 1
    Supports custom plugins in any language
  • 1
    Many hundreds of plugins

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Fluentd?

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

What is Telegraf?

It is an agent for collecting, processing, aggregating, and writing metrics. Design goals are to have a minimal memory footprint with a plugin system so that developers in the community can easily add support for collecting metrics.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention Fluentd and Telegraf as a desired skillset
Postman
San Francisco, United States
What companies use Fluentd?
What companies use Telegraf?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Fluentd?
What tools integrate with Telegraf?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

Rancher Labs

KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
5
1522
What are some alternatives to Fluentd and Telegraf?
Logstash
Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.
Splunk
It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.
collectd
collectd gathers statistics about the system it is running on and stores this information. Those statistics can then be used to find current performance bottlenecks (i.e. performance analysis) and predict future system load (i.e. capacity planning). Or if you just want pretty graphs of your private server and are fed up with some homegrown solution you're at the right place, too.
Filebeat
It helps you keep the simple things simple by offering a lightweight way to forward and centralize logs and files.
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).
See all alternatives