Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Fork vs Tower: What are the differences?
Key Differences Between Fork and Tower
Fork and Tower are both popular Git client software that offer different features and functionalities. Here are the key differences between Fork and Tower:
-
User Interface:
- Fork: Fork provides a more modern and intuitive user interface, making it easier for users to navigate through different features and options.
- Tower: Tower has a more traditional and app-like user interface, providing a familiar experience for users who are accustomed to other software.
-
Platform Compatibility:
- Fork: Fork is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems, allowing users to work on their preferred platform.
- Tower: Tower is primarily designed for macOS users, with limited support for other platforms.
-
Cloud Integration:
- Fork: Fork offers integrated support for popular cloud platforms such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, allowing users to easily clone repositories, track changes, and collaborate with team members.
- Tower: Tower also offers cloud integration with platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket, but lacks support for GitLab.
-
Price and Licensing:
- Fork: Fork offers a free version with limited features, as well as a paid version with advanced functionalities for individuals and teams.
- Tower: Tower is a commercial software that requires a paid license for full access to all its features and capabilities.
-
Advanced Features:
- Fork: Fork provides advanced features such as conflict resolution, interactive rebase, automatic stashing, and support for submodule management.
- Tower: Tower also offers similar advanced features, including conflict resolution, interactive rebase, and submodule support, but may offer a more refined and polished user experience.
-
Customizability:
- Fork: Fork allows users to customize their workflows and preferences with options for keyboard shortcuts, user-defined templates, and color themes.
- Tower: Tower provides limited customization options compared to Fork, with fewer settings available for users to personalize their experience.
In summary, Fork and Tower differ in terms of user interface, platform compatibility, cloud integration, pricing, advanced features, and customizability. Users should choose based on their specific needs and preferences.
I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.
It allows * to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie) * it helps to investigate the history * most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
Pros of Fork
- One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs19
- Nice UX14
- Does the job way better than others13
- Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast13
- Dark theme11
- Intuitive interactive rebase and conflict resolution UI9
- Gitflow support9
- Excellent commit history tree view7
- This even looks the same as SourceTree5
- Repository Manager4
- Built-in developer feedback3
- Countless quality of life features3
- Github Notifications2
- Not buggy, works smoothly2
- Keyaboard-only2
- Visual branch history2
- Reflog support2
- Git ammend1
- Smart 'Open in' menu; e.g. explorer, bit, giithub .1
- Interactive rebase window1
- Native application1
- Intuitive merge conflict resolution1
- Unique Activity Manager shows current/past operations1
Pros of Tower
- Git19
- Just works16
- Version control10
- Awesome6
- Simple layout6
- Multiple windows4
- Automatic repo discovery3
- Multiple tabs3
- Submodule support2
- Github integration2
- Full featured client2
- Uses standard git terminology and methods2
- Gitflow support2
- Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines2
- SAS1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Fork
- Poorly written license2
- Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history1
- Merges that require interactive user decision1
Cons of Tower
- Expensive5
- Subscription based4
- No side by side diff1
- Merge conflict resolution impossible/unclear0