StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. User Feedback As A Service
  5. FullStory vs rrweb

FullStory vs rrweb

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

FullStory
FullStory
Stacks288
Followers283
Votes33
rrweb
rrweb
Stacks8
Followers6
Votes0
GitHub Stars18.8K
Forks1.6K

FullStory vs rrweb: What are the differences?

Introduction

When considering technologies for recording and analyzing user interactions on a website, FullStory and rrweb are two popular options. While both tools serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two that make each suitable for different use cases.

  1. Data Collection: FullStory captures user interactions in real-time and provides playback capabilities to analyze the entire session flow, including page transitions and interactions. In contrast, rrweb focuses on recording DOM events, such as mouse movements, clicks, and keystrokes, for a granular view of user behavior.

  2. Integration with Analytics Tools: FullStory offers seamless integration with various analytics platforms, allowing for a holistic analysis of user behavior alongside other website metrics. On the other hand, rrweb provides raw event data that can be exported and integrated with analytics tools separately, requiring additional processing for comprehensive insights.

  3. Privacy and Compliance: FullStory offers features like masking sensitive data and compliance with privacy regulations to ensure user data protection. In comparison, rrweb focuses on capturing detailed user interactions without built-in privacy protection mechanisms, requiring additional measures to maintain compliance with data privacy laws.

  4. Playback Capabilities: FullStory provides advanced features for replaying user sessions, such as search functionality and heatmaps, to visualize user behavior patterns effectively. In contrast, rrweb focuses primarily on capturing raw interaction data, leaving the analysis and visualization of user behavior to be handled by external tools or custom implementations.

  5. Real-time Monitoring: FullStory enables real-time monitoring of user sessions, allowing for immediate insights into user behavior and issues on a website. Conversely, rrweb's data collection approach may require post-session analysis, limiting its real-time monitoring capabilities compared to FullStory.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: FullStory offers a range of customization options and integrations with third-party tools to enhance user experience tracking and analysis. Conversely, rrweb's lightweight and open-source nature allows for easier customization and extension but may require more development effort for advanced functionality compared to FullStory.

In Summary, FullStory and rrweb differ in data collection methods, integration capabilities, privacy features, playback options, real-time monitoring, and customization offerings, making each tool suitable for unique user tracking and analysis requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

FullStory
FullStory
rrweb
rrweb

FullStory’s unmatched analytics engine automatically indexes every digital interaction with your site or app and empowers teams to measure, validate, and act on each experience at scale.

It is an open source web session replay library, which provides easy-to-use APIs to record user's interactions and replay it remotely.

Session Replay; Omnisearch; User Segmentation; Integrations; Session Notes; Shareable Session Links; Webhooks; Alerts; Data Export; User Trends; Event Funnels; Heatmaps; Dev Tools; Co-browsing; Frustration Signals; Dashboards; Watched Elements; Exclude Sensitive Data; Restrict by IPS, User Agent, or Location; Consent API; Custom Events; FS.Identify API; Delete Users; SAML Single Sign-on.
User analysis; Reproduce bugs; Demonstrate web; Real-time collaboration
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
18.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.6K
Stacks
288
Stacks
8
Followers
283
Followers
6
Votes
33
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    See full user sessions
  • 5
    "Skip inactivity" during playback
  • 5
    Playback console errors as they happen
  • 5
    Speed up playback
  • 3
    Segment users based on actions
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive
  • 1
    We'll never get through all the sessions recorded
  • 1
    Doesn't integrate with our exception monitoring
  • 1
    If you're using it via Segment, it's all or nothing
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Pendo
Pendo
UserVoice
UserVoice
Intercom
Intercom
Google Analytics
Google Analytics
Mixpanel
Mixpanel
Zendesk
Zendesk
Slack
Slack
Segment
Segment
New Relic
New Relic
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to FullStory, rrweb?

LogRocket

LogRocket

LogRocket combines session replay, performance monitoring, and product analytics – empowering software teams to create the ideal product experience.

Inspectlet

Inspectlet

Inspectlet records videos of your visitors as they use your site, allowing you to see everything they do. See every mouse movement, scroll, click, and keypress on your site. You never need to wonder how visitors are using your site again.

UserTesting

UserTesting

UserTesting provides on-demand usability testing. You create the test and we’ll get the testers. We let you “look over the shoulder” of your target audience while they use your website, so you can see and hear where users get stuck and why they leave.

rrweb.io

rrweb.io

rrweb is an open source web session replay library, which provides easy-to-use APIs to record user's interactions and replay it remotely.

VibeBack

VibeBack

The zero-budget, open-source feedback widget for your MVP. Ship faster. Iterate better.

Roast My Web: Improve your website with AI Reviews

Roast My Web: Improve your website with AI Reviews

AI Roast My Website - Get your site roasted by AI for real feedback! Find high-converting landing page tips, and get actionable feedback for your website.

Ochat

Ochat

Tired of sugar-coated feedback that leaves you guessing? Ochat's 3-step magic—create a link, share it, chat anonymously—unlocks raw, real-time truths to fix your flops before they flop harder!

Gridapps Testimonials

Gridapps Testimonials

Collect, manage, and showcase powerful testimonials with customizable widgets. From video shoutouts to text reviews, Gridapps helps businesses highlight real customer voices, build trust, and boost conversions across every channel.

Mapster

Mapster

Mapster provides a feedback platform specifically designed for early-stage startups to rapidly achieve Product Market Fit (PMF) using the proven Sean Ellis 40% framework. The platform integrates behavioural data with contextual user feedback, enabling startups to identify power user segments, understand why users are or aren't hooked, and iterate product development efficiently. By automating feedback collection and segmentation, Mapster accelerates the learning loop from months to days, helping startups optimize retention, growth, and revenue.

TheySaid

TheySaid

TheySaid - The everything app for feedback, powered by AI and voice to gather, analyze, and act on feedback. Conduct interviews, user tests, surveys, polls, and funnel results into a single dashboard or your database via integrations. Popular use cases include onboarding, customer + employee experience, lost sales deals, product research, and more!

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope