StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. In Browser Testing
  5. Ghost Inspector vs Katalon Studio

Ghost Inspector vs Katalon Studio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
Stacks64
Followers117
Votes22
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
Stacks152
Followers177
Votes0

Ghost Inspector vs Katalon Studio: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment: One key difference between Ghost Inspector and Katalon Studio is the deployment method. Ghost Inspector is a cloud-based solution, allowing you to run tests directly from the cloud, while Katalon Studio is an on-premise solution, requiring you to set up and maintain the testing environment on your own servers.
  2. Programming Language Support: Ghost Inspector primarily supports JavaScript for test scripting, while Katalon Studio supports a wide range of programming languages such as Java, Groovy, and Python, providing more flexibility for users with different language preferences.
  3. User Interface: Katalon Studio offers a user-friendly and visually intuitive interface, making it easier for non-technical users to create and manage test cases, whereas Ghost Inspector has a simpler interface focused on functionality, which may require some technical knowledge to navigate.
  4. Community Support: Katalon Studio has a large and active community of users, providing extensive online resources, forums, and support for troubleshooting and knowledge sharing, whereas Ghost Inspector has a smaller community and fewer resources available for users seeking help and guidance.
  5. Integration Capabilities: Katalon Studio offers a wider range of integrations with popular tools and platforms such as Jira, Jenkins, and GitHub, allowing for seamless automation workflows, while Ghost Inspector has limited integration options, which may be a limitation for users looking to integrate with specific tools.
  6. Cost Structure: Ghost Inspector offers a subscription-based pricing model based on the number of test executions and features, while Katalon Studio provides a freemium model with different pricing tiers based on the number of users and additional features, offering more flexibility in terms of cost management.

In Summary, Ghost Inspector and Katalon Studio differ in deployment, programming language support, user interface, community support, integration capabilities, and cost structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Katalon Studio is a free and robust automation solution for API, Web and Mobile testing. It integrates all necessary components with built-in keywords and project templates into a complete automation framework. Katalon Studio is easy-to-use for new users but still offers advanced capabilities for experienced users. The solution is trusted by an active community of over 150K users from 150+ countries around the world.

Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option
Productive IDE for API automation; API testing centric; Built to work with modern frameworks; Sustainable and scalable platform; Minimal maintenance; Built-in project templates; Generate tests automatically; Powerful test execution mechanism; CI/CD readiness; Dynamic failure handling and automatic re-execution; Report and Debug; Test Maintenance
Statistics
Stacks
64
Stacks
152
Followers
117
Followers
177
Votes
22
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    No code required
  • 3
    Simple test editor
  • 3
    Runscope integration
  • 2
    Videos of every test run
  • 2
    Screenshot comparison
Cons
  • 1
    Support Cross-device testing (device, web)
  • 0
    Flash Support inside browser
  • 0
    Load & Performance testing
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Runscope
Runscope
GitHub
GitHub
Heroku
Heroku
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
HipChat
HipChat
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Travis CI
Travis CI
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
TestLink
TestLink
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, Katalon Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana