Git vs TortoiseSVN

Overview

Git

Stacks343.6K

Followers184.2K

Votes6.6K

GitHub Stars57.1K

Forks26.9K

TortoiseSVN

Stacks54

Followers117

Votes3

GitHub Stars43

Forks30

Git vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Git and TortoiseSVN are both version control systems used for managing changes in computer files. While they serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

Architecture: Git is a distributed version control system, meaning that each user has a complete copy of the repository. This enables users to work offline and have access to the full history of the project. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is a centralized version control system, where a central server manages the repository and users have a local working copy.
Branching and Merging: Git has more advanced branching and merging capabilities compared to TortoiseSVN. Git allows for lightweight and efficient branch creation, which makes it easier to work on multiple tasks simultaneously. It also has powerful merging algorithms that can intelligently handle complex merges. TortoiseSVN, while it does support branching and merging, has a more linear approach and its merging capabilities are not as robust as Git's.
Performance: Git is known for its speed and efficiency. It uses a compressed binary format to store files and their history, which results in faster operations and a smaller repository size. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, uses a centralized approach and can be slower for larger repositories or when dealing with lots of branches and merges.
Workflow: Git follows a flexible and decentralized workflow that allows for more independent and parallel development. Each developer can work on their own branch and easily integrate changes with others. TortoiseSVN, being centralized, requires developers to commit their changes to the main repository frequently and rely on the central server for synchronization.
User Interface: TortoiseSVN provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that integrates with Windows Explorer, making it easy to perform version control operations directly from the file manager. Git, on the other hand, primarily operates through the command line interface (CLI), although there are GUI tools available such as GitKraken and SourceTree.
Client-Server Model: TortoiseSVN relies on a client-server model, where a central server manages the repository and controls access to it. Users need to connect to the server to perform version control operations. Git, on the other hand, can be used even in a peer-to-peer manner, allowing users to clone, work on branches, and make commits locally without the need for a central server.

In summary, Git is a distributed version control system with more advanced features and faster performance, while TortoiseSVN is a centralized system with a user-friendly GUI.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Git	TortoiseSVN
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.	It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.
-	Easy to use. all commands are available directly from the Windows Explorer;Powerful commit dialog. integrated spell checker for log messages;Per project settings;Integration with issue tracking systems; Helpful Tools;Available in many languages
Statistics
GitHub Stars 57.1K	GitHub Stars 43
GitHub Forks 26.9K	GitHub Forks 30
Stacks 343.6K	Stacks 54
Followers 184.2K	Followers 117
Votes 6.6K	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 1429 Distributed version control system 1053 Efficient branching and merging 959 Fast 843 Open source 726 Better than svn Cons 16 Hard to learn 11 Inconsistent command line interface 9 Easy to lose uncommitted work 8 Worst documentation ever possibly made 5 Awful merge handling	Pros 3 Easy to use
Integrations
No integrations available	Windows Visual Studio Code

What are some alternatives to Git, TortoiseSVN?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Git vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Git and TortoiseSVN are both version control systems used for managing changes in computer files. While they serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between the two.

Architecture: Git is a distributed version control system, meaning that each user has a complete copy of the repository. This enables users to work offline and have access to the full history of the project. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is a centralized version control system, where a central server manages the repository and users have a local working copy.
Branching and Merging: Git has more advanced branching and merging capabilities compared to TortoiseSVN. Git allows for lightweight and efficient branch creation, which makes it easier to work on multiple tasks simultaneously. It also has powerful merging algorithms that can intelligently handle complex merges. TortoiseSVN, while it does support branching and merging, has a more linear approach and its merging capabilities are not as robust as Git's.
Performance: Git is known for its speed and efficiency. It uses a compressed binary format to store files and their history, which results in faster operations and a smaller repository size. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, uses a centralized approach and can be slower for larger repositories or when dealing with lots of branches and merges.
Workflow: Git follows a flexible and decentralized workflow that allows for more independent and parallel development. Each developer can work on their own branch and easily integrate changes with others. TortoiseSVN, being centralized, requires developers to commit their changes to the main repository frequently and rely on the central server for synchronization.
User Interface: TortoiseSVN provides a graphical user interface (GUI) that integrates with Windows Explorer, making it easy to perform version control operations directly from the file manager. Git, on the other hand, primarily operates through the command line interface (CLI), although there are GUI tools available such as GitKraken and SourceTree.
Client-Server Model: TortoiseSVN relies on a client-server model, where a central server manages the repository and controls access to it. Users need to connect to the server to perform version control operations. Git, on the other hand, can be used even in a peer-to-peer manner, allowing users to clone, work on branches, and make commits locally without the need for a central server.

In summary, Git is a distributed version control system with more advanced features and faster performance, while TortoiseSVN is a centralized system with a user-friendly GUI.