Gitblit vs GitHub vs GitLab

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Gitblit

19
55
+ 1
4
GitHub

280.4K
244.6K
+ 1
10.3K
GitLab

60.9K
52.2K
+ 1
2.5K

GitHub vs GitLab vs Gitblit: What are the differences?

Introduction

Git is a distributed version control system that allows multiple people to collaborate on a project simultaneously. GitHub, GitLab, and Gitblit are three popular web-based platforms that provide hosting and management services for Git repositories. In this Markdown code, we will explore the key differences between GitHub, GitLab, and Gitblit.

  1. Repository hosting: GitHub is primarily used for hosting open-source projects and has a large community of developers. GitLab, on the other hand, offers both hosted and self-hosted solutions, allowing organizations to have more control over their repositories. Gitblit is a lightweight Git web server that is often used in smaller organizations or teams.

  2. Pricing and licensing: GitHub offers free hosting for public repositories, but charges fees for private repositories and additional features. GitLab, on the other hand, provides a free community edition that can be self-hosted, as well as premium options with additional features. Gitblit is entirely open-source and free to use.

  3. Built-in continuous integration: GitLab has a built-in continuous integration and deployment system, allowing developers to automatically build, test, and deploy their code. GitHub offers a similar service called GitHub Actions, while Gitblit does not have this feature built-in.

  4. Issue tracking and project management: GitLab and GitHub offer advanced issue tracking and project management tools, such as the ability to create and assign tasks, track progress, and automate workflows. Gitblit, being a lightweight web server, does not provide these extensive project management features.

  5. Collaboration features: GitLab and GitHub have built-in features that allow developers to collaborate on code, such as code reviews, pull requests, and inline commenting. These features make it easier for teams to work together and ensure code quality. Gitblit does not provide these collaboration features.

  6. Integrations and extensibility: GitHub has a wide range of integrations and plugins available, allowing developers to integrate their repositories with other tools and services. GitLab also provides a similar level of extensibility and allows integrations with popular project management tools. Gitblit, being a lightweight solution, has limited integration options.

In summary, GitHub is widely used for hosting open-source projects with a strong community, while GitLab offers more control and features for organizations with both self-hosted and hosted options. Gitblit is a lightweight Git web server suitable for smaller teams or organizations.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Gitblit
Pros of GitHub
Pros of GitLab
  • 1
    Fast and fulfill just the features I need
  • 1
    Better user & group management
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Easy to setup. Runs on OSX
  • 0
    Windows authentication is supported
  • 0
    Run on Windows
  • 1.8K
    Open source friendly
  • 1.5K
    Easy source control
  • 1.3K
    Nice UI
  • 1.1K
    Great for team collaboration
  • 867
    Easy setup
  • 504
    Issue tracker
  • 486
    Great community
  • 482
    Remote team collaboration
  • 451
    Great way to share
  • 442
    Pull request and features planning
  • 147
    Just works
  • 132
    Integrated in many tools
  • 121
    Free Public Repos
  • 116
    Github Gists
  • 112
    Github pages
  • 83
    Easy to find repos
  • 62
    Open source
  • 60
    It's free
  • 60
    Easy to find projects
  • 56
    Network effect
  • 49
    Extensive API
  • 43
    Organizations
  • 42
    Branching
  • 34
    Developer Profiles
  • 32
    Git Powered Wikis
  • 30
    Great for collaboration
  • 24
    It's fun
  • 23
    Clean interface and good integrations
  • 22
    Community SDK involvement
  • 20
    Learn from others source code
  • 16
    Because: Git
  • 14
    It integrates directly with Azure
  • 10
    Standard in Open Source collab
  • 10
    Newsfeed
  • 8
    It integrates directly with Hipchat
  • 8
    Fast
  • 8
    Beautiful user experience
  • 7
    Easy to discover new code libraries
  • 6
    Smooth integration
  • 6
    Cloud SCM
  • 6
    Nice API
  • 6
    Graphs
  • 6
    Integrations
  • 6
    It's awesome
  • 5
    Quick Onboarding
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 5
    Remarkable uptime
  • 5
    CI Integration
  • 5
    Hands down best online Git service available
  • 4
    Uses GIT
  • 4
    Version Control
  • 4
    Simple but powerful
  • 4
    Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
  • 4
    Free HTML hosting
  • 4
    Security options
  • 4
    Loved by developers
  • 4
    Easy to use and collaborate with others
  • 3
    Ci
  • 3
    IAM
  • 3
    Nice to use
  • 3
    Easy deployment via SSH
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Leads the copycats
  • 2
    All in one development service
  • 2
    Free private repos
  • 2
    Free HTML hostings
  • 2
    Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 2
    Easy source control and everything is backed up
  • 2
    IAM integration
  • 2
    Very Easy to Use
  • 2
    Good tools support
  • 2
    Issues tracker
  • 2
    Never dethroned
  • 2
    Self Hosted
  • 1
    Dasf
  • 1
    Profound
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 430
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
  • 137
    Includes many features, including ci
  • 113
    Nice UI
  • 84
    Good integration with gitlabci
  • 57
    Simple setup
  • 34
    Has an official mobile app
  • 34
    Free private repository
  • 31
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Open source, great ui (like github)
  • 18
    Slack Integration
  • 15
    Full CI flow
  • 11
    Free and unlimited private git repos
  • 10
    User, group, and project access management is simple
  • 9
    All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)
  • 8
    Built-in CI
  • 8
    Intuitive UI
  • 6
    Full DevOps suite with Git
  • 6
    Both public and private Repositories
  • 5
    So easy to use
  • 5
    CI
  • 5
    Integrated Docker Registry
  • 5
    It's powerful source code management tool
  • 5
    Build/pipeline definition alongside code
  • 4
    Issue system
  • 4
    Dockerized
  • 4
    Unlimited free repos & collaborators
  • 4
    Security and Stable
  • 4
    On-premises
  • 4
    It's fully integrated
  • 4
    Mattermost Chat client
  • 4
    Excellent
  • 3
    Great for team collaboration
  • 3
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 3
    Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment
  • 3
    I like the its runners and executors feature
  • 3
    Free private repos
  • 3
    Because is the best remote host for git repositories
  • 3
    Not Microsoft Owned
  • 3
    Opensource
  • 2
    Groups of groups
  • 2
    Powerful software planning and maintaining tools
  • 2
    Review Apps feature
  • 2
    Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI
  • 2
    It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker
  • 2
    Multilingual interface
  • 2
    HipChat intergration
  • 2
    Powerful Continuous Integration System
  • 2
    One-click install through DigitalOcean
  • 2
    The dashboard with deployed environments
  • 2
    Native CI
  • 2
    Many private repo
  • 2
    Kubernetes Integration
  • 2
    Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)
  • 2
    Wounderful
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 1
    Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Gitblit
Cons of GitHub
Cons of GitLab
  • 2
    Confusing UI
  • 0
    Squash and Merge is not supported
  • 0
    No active development
  • 0
    No code review functionality
  • 0
    No Pull Requests
  • 53
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 37
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 8
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
  • 3
    Limited featureset for issue management
  • 2
    GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
  • 2
    Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
  • 1
    No multilingual interface
  • 1
    Takes a long time to commit
  • 1
    Expensive
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 8
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Gitblit?

Gitblit is an open source, pure Java Git solution for managing, viewing, and serving Git repositories. It can serve repositories over the GIT, HTTP, and SSH transports; it can authenticate against multiple providers; and it allows you to get up-and-running with an attractive, capable Git server in less than 5 minutes.

What is GitHub?

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

What is GitLab?

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Gitblit?
What companies use GitHub?
What companies use GitLab?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Gitblit?
What tools integrate with GitHub?
What tools integrate with GitLab?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

DigitalOcean

GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
2
2370
GitHubOptimizelySegment+3
2
1179
Mar 18 2020 at 9:12AM

LaunchDarkly

GitHubLaunchDarkly+2
7
1116
JavaScriptGitHubReact+12
5
4144
What are some alternatives to Gitblit, GitHub, and GitLab?
Gitolite
Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.
Gogs
The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
Bitbucket
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
Gitea
Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.
Git
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
See all alternatives