StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

Β© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Gitea vs Phabricator

Gitea vs Phabricator

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phabricator
Phabricator
Stacks221
Followers323
Votes187
Gitea
Gitea
Stacks323
Followers448
Votes123
GitHub Stars51.8K
Forks6.2K

Gitea vs Phabricator: What are the differences?

Introduction

Gitea and Phabricator are two popular tools used for managing software development projects. Both tools offer a range of features to facilitate collaboration and project management within development teams.

1. Key Features:

Gitea is a lightweight and self-hosted Git service whereas Phabricator is a suite of tools for code review, repository hosting, and project management. Gitea focuses primarily on providing a Git-based version control system along with issue tracking, wikis, and pull requests capabilities, while Phabricator offers a more comprehensive set of tools for code reviews, task management, auditing, and continuous integration.

2. User Interface:

Gitea has a user-friendly and minimalistic interface that is easy to navigate and understand, making it accessible to developers of all skill levels. In contrast, Phabricator has a more complex and feature-rich interface that may require a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all its functionalities.

3. Extensibility:

Gitea is designed to be lightweight and resource-efficient, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. While it supports some degree of customization through plugins and themes, its extensibility capabilities are more limited compared to Phabricator, which offers a wide range of extensible features and tools that can be tailored to specific project requirements.

4. Integration:

Phabricator provides seamless integration with a variety of third-party tools and services, including popular code hosting platforms, chat applications, and issue trackers. On the other hand, Gitea's integration capabilities are more limited, with fewer options for connecting to external tools and services out of the box.

5. Community Support:

Gitea has a large and active open-source community that contributes to its development and provides support through forums, documentation, and community-driven plugins. Phabricator also has a supportive community, but its focus on larger enterprises and complex workflows means that its user base may be more specialized and smaller compared to Gitea.

6. Licensing:

One key difference between Gitea and Phabricator is their licensing models. Gitea is an open-source project released under the MIT License, allowing users to freely use, modify, and distribute the software without restrictions. In contrast, Phabricator is released under a custom license called the "The Aperturism Public License," which may have different implications for organizations in terms of usage and distribution rights.

In Summary, Gitea and Phabricator differ in key areas such as features, user interface, extensibility, integration, community support, and licensing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Phabricator, Gitea

Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Phabricator
Phabricator
Gitea
Gitea

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

reviewing code before it hits master; auditing code after it hits master; hosting Git/Hg/SVN repositories; tracking bugs or "features"; counting down to HL3; expounding liberal tomes of text; nit picking pixels with designers; "project" "manage" "ment"; hiding stuff from coworkers; and also other random things, like memes, badges, and tokens.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
51.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
221
Stacks
323
Followers
323
Followers
448
Votes
187
Votes
123
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Open Source
  • 29
    Code Review
  • 25
    Supports Git/Hg/SVN
  • 18
    Bug Tracking
  • 17
    Audit Source Code
Pros
  • 24
    Self-hosted
  • 16
    Lightweight
  • 15
    Free
  • 12
    Simple
  • 9
    Easy Setup
Cons
  • 3
    Community-fork of Gogs
  • 0
    Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
Asana
Asana
Jira
Jira
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Raspberry Pi
Raspberry Pi
DingTalk
DingTalk
Discord
Discord
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Vagrant
Vagrant
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Phabricator, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana