StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. Project Management
  5. Github Actions vs Jira Core

Github Actions vs Jira Core

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jira Core
Jira Core
Stacks36
Followers47
Votes0
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Stacks48.2K
Followers3.1K
Votes27

Github Actions vs Jira Core: What are the differences?

Introduction

Github Actions and Jira Core are both powerful tools used in software development, but they have key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore and compare these differences to help you understand their unique features and capabilities.

1. Integration with Version Control:

Github Actions is fully integrated with Git repositories and provides seamless automation for various tasks such as code compilation, testing, and deployment. It allows developers to define custom workflows that are triggered by specific events such as pull requests or code pushes. On the other hand, Jira Core is primarily a project management tool and does not have the same level of integration with version control systems. While it can track changes and link to code repositories, it does not provide the extensive automation capabilities offered by Github Actions.

2. Workflow Customization:

Github Actions offers a high level of customization when it comes to defining workflows. Developers can create complex workflows with multiple steps and conditional logic to automate various aspects of their software development process. Jira Core, on the other hand, focuses more on task management and provides standardized workflows that can be customized to some extent. However, the level of workflow customization in Jira Core is not as extensive as in Github Actions.

3. Third-Party Integrations:

Github Actions has built-in integrations with a wide range of third-party tools and services, such as Slack, AWS, and Azure, allowing developers to incorporate these services seamlessly into their workflows. Jira Core, although it also supports integrations with external tools, may require additional plugins or extensions to achieve similar levels of integration. Therefore, Github Actions offers a more streamlined experience in terms of integrating with external services.

4. Collaboration and Communication:

Github Actions provides a collaborative environment where developers can easily collaborate on workflows and share code snippets or actions with the community, fostering a culture of open-source collaboration. Jira Core, although it allows for collaboration through comments and notifications, is primarily focused on task management and lacks the same level of community-driven collaboration features offered by Github Actions.

5. Pricing and Licensing:

Github Actions offers a free tier that allows for a limited number of workflow minutes per month, making it an attractive option for small and medium-sized teams or individual developers. Additional workflow minutes can be purchased as needed. Jira Core, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based model and requires a license, making it more suitable for larger teams or organizations with specific project management needs.

6. Extensibility and Customization:

Github Actions can be extended through custom actions, allowing developers to create and share reusable components that can be used in workflows. This extensibility allows for a high level of customization and flexibility. Jira Core, although it supports customization through plugins and extensions, may not offer the same level of extensibility as Github Actions. Therefore, developers looking for extensive customization options may find Github Actions more suitable.

In Summary, Github Actions offers superior integration with version control, extensive workflow customization, built-in third-party integrations, a collaborative environment, a free tier option, and higher extensibility compared to Jira Core, making it a powerful choice for software development automation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jira Core, GitHub Actions

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira Core
Jira Core
GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

It is a JIRA application that provides you with a workflow management system that you can use for many things, including running projects, tracking assets, and basically anything that requires work moving through a workflow.

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Business project templates. Use out-of-the-box business project templates to manage simple tasks and complex workflows alike; Notifications. Use @mentions to get the attention of specific team members and stay informed with handy, detailed notifications; Reports and Dashboards.
Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks
36
Stacks
48.2K
Followers
47
Followers
3.1K
Votes
0
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 8
    Integration with GitHub
  • 5
    Free
  • 3
    Easy to duplicate a workflow
  • 3
    Ready actions in Marketplace
  • 2
    Read actions in Marketplace
Cons
  • 5
    Lacking [skip ci]
  • 4
    Lacking allow failure
  • 3
    Lacking job specific badges
  • 2
    No ssh login to servers
  • 1
    No manual launch
Integrations
Trello
Trello
Jira
Jira
Confluence
Confluence
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Jira Core, GitHub Actions?

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Asana

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana