Github Actions vs notion.so

Overview

Notion

Stacks2.8K

Followers1.6K

Votes100

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

Github Actions vs notion.so: What are the differences?

Integration with existing repositories: Github Actions provides seamless integration with repositories on Github, allowing developers to easily automate various tasks within their software development process. On the other hand, notion.so is primarily a note-taking and collaboration tool, focusing on organizing and sharing information rather than automating development tasks.
Workflow and automation capabilities: Github Actions offers a powerful workflow and automation engine, allowing developers to define custom workflows and automate tasks such as building, testing, and deploying their code. By contrast, notion.so lacks these workflow and automation capabilities, as it is primarily designed for content organization.
Version control and collaboration: Github Actions is tightly integrated with Git version control system, allowing developers to easily track changes, collaborate with others, and manage code repositories. notion.so, on the other hand, does not have built-in version control features and is more focused on organizing and sharing information rather than collaborating on code.
Community and marketplace: Github Actions benefits from a large and active developer community, with various open-source actions available in the marketplace. Developers can easily find and reuse these community-contributed actions to enhance their workflows. In contrast, notion.so does not have a marketplace for community-contributed workflows or integrations.
Scalability and infrastructure: Github Actions leverages Github's infrastructure, enabling it to scale effortlessly for large projects and handle high build volumes. notion.so, on the other hand, is a primarily web-based tool and may have limitations in terms of scalability and handling heavy workloads.
Pricing and licensing: Github Actions offers different pricing tiers, including a free tier for public repositories, allowing developers to use it at no additional cost. notion.so, on the other hand, has its own pricing model and does not offer a free tier beyond a trial period, making it a paid service for extended usage.

In summary, Github Actions provides tight integration with Github repositories, powerful workflow and automation capabilities, version control and collaboration features, a vibrant community and marketplace, scalability with Github's infrastructure, and flexible pricing options. On the other hand, notion.so is primarily designed for note-taking and content organization, lacking workflow automation, version control, and scalability features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Notion, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Notion	GitHub Actions
A new tool that blends your everyday work apps into one. It's a unified and collaborative workspace for you and your team	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
-	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 2.8K	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 1.6K	Followers 3.1K
Votes 100	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
Pros 22 One place for almost every project management work 15 Easy to get started 15 Very structured documents 15 Flexible 9 Dark Mode Cons 5 Api is still in development 4 Lack of database permissions 2 Evernote import flaky 2 Slow 1 No markdown editor	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Read actions in Marketplace Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No manual launch
Integrations
Jira Confluence Basecamp	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Notion, GitHub Actions?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Github Actions vs notion.so: What are the differences?

Integration with existing repositories: Github Actions provides seamless integration with repositories on Github, allowing developers to easily automate various tasks within their software development process. On the other hand, notion.so is primarily a note-taking and collaboration tool, focusing on organizing and sharing information rather than automating development tasks.
Workflow and automation capabilities: Github Actions offers a powerful workflow and automation engine, allowing developers to define custom workflows and automate tasks such as building, testing, and deploying their code. By contrast, notion.so lacks these workflow and automation capabilities, as it is primarily designed for content organization.
Version control and collaboration: Github Actions is tightly integrated with Git version control system, allowing developers to easily track changes, collaborate with others, and manage code repositories. notion.so, on the other hand, does not have built-in version control features and is more focused on organizing and sharing information rather than collaborating on code.
Community and marketplace: Github Actions benefits from a large and active developer community, with various open-source actions available in the marketplace. Developers can easily find and reuse these community-contributed actions to enhance their workflows. In contrast, notion.so does not have a marketplace for community-contributed workflows or integrations.
Scalability and infrastructure: Github Actions leverages Github's infrastructure, enabling it to scale effortlessly for large projects and handle high build volumes. notion.so, on the other hand, is a primarily web-based tool and may have limitations in terms of scalability and handling heavy workloads.
Pricing and licensing: Github Actions offers different pricing tiers, including a free tier for public repositories, allowing developers to use it at no additional cost. notion.so, on the other hand, has its own pricing model and does not offer a free tier beyond a trial period, making it a paid service for extended usage.

Github Actions vs notion.so

Overview