GitHub vs Reviewable: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitHub and Reviewable are two popular platforms for code review and collaboration in software development. While both platforms offer similar features, they have some key differences that set them apart.

1. Workflow flexibility: GitHub provides a comprehensive platform for managing code repositories, issue tracking, and collaboration tools. It is widely used for hosting open-source and private projects, with robust version control and branch management capabilities. On the other hand, Reviewable focuses primarily on code review, providing a streamlined interface for reviewing changes, leaving comments, and discussing code. It integrates well with GitHub, making it easy to use alongside the existing workflow.

2. Interface and usability: GitHub has a feature-rich interface with a multitude of options for managing repositories, collaborating with team members, and tracking issues. It caters to a broad range of users and can be more overwhelming for new users. Reviewable, on the other hand, has a clean and simplified interface, specifically designed for code review. Its focused approach allows reviewers to quickly navigate through changes and provide feedback, resulting in a smoother review process.

3. Code review process: GitHub offers a comprehensive but relatively static code review process. Developers create pull requests, reviewers leave comments and suggestions, and changes are made based on that feedback. Reviewable provides a more dynamic code review process, allowing reviewers to leave line-level comments directly in the code and have discussions with other reviewers and the author. This promotes a more interactive and collaborative review process.

4. Integration with other tools: GitHub has a vast ecosystem of integrations with external tools and services. It seamlessly integrates with continuous integration and deployment systems, project management tools, documentation platforms, and more. Reviewable, while primarily focused on code review, can also integrate with these tools but to a lesser extent. It offers integrations with popular task tracking and project management tools, ensuring a smooth workflow.

5. Pricing and licensing: GitHub offers both free and paid plans, catering to both individual developers and organizations. The free plan allows for public repositories and limited features, while the paid plans provide more advanced features, increased storage, and options for private repositories. Reviewable also offers free and paid plans, but it specifically targets organizations and teams. Its paid plans provide additional features like team management, advanced analytics, and priority support.

6. Customization and extensibility: GitHub allows developers to create custom workflows, automate processes with GitHub Actions, and customize the platform to their specific needs. It also offers APIs for integrating with external tools and extending its capabilities. Reviewable, while offering some customization options, is more focused on providing a streamlined code review experience. It prioritizes ease-of-use over extensive customization possibilities.

In summary, while both GitHub and Reviewable cater to the code review and collaboration needs of developers, GitHub offers a more comprehensive platform for managing code repositories and project workflows, whereas Reviewable provides a focused and streamlined interface specifically designed for code review.