Gitter vs Zulip

Overview

Gitter

Stacks225

Followers257

Votes277

Zulip

Stacks223

Followers344

Votes366

GitHub Stars23.7K

Forks8.9K

Gitter vs Zulip: What are the differences?

Cost: Gitter is free to use for public repositories, while Zulip offers a free plan with limited features and pricing for additional features.
Organization of Conversations: Gitter uses a linear chat system where all messages are displayed in order, while Zulip employs a topic-based threading system for more organized discussions.
Integration: Zulip supports a wide range of integrations with third-party services and tools, whereas Gitter has limited integration options.
Notification System: Zulip offers more advanced notification settings, allowing users to customize how they receive alerts for different conversations, while Gitter has basic notification options.
User Interface: Zulip has a more modern and visually appealing interface compared to Gitter, offering a better user experience.

In Summary, Gitter and Zulip differ in terms of cost, conversation organization, integration, notification system, and user interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Gitter, Zulip

StackShare

Apr 24, 2019

Needs adviceon

Gitter

Discord

Spectrum

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

1.32M views1.32M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gitter	Zulip
Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.	Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.
Know who's seen any message;Edit messages after you've sent them;Full emoji support;Special Lurk Mode;IRC bridge.;Automatically embeds content like Gists, YouTube, pictures of cats and other stuff;Desktop notifications and @mentions.;Infinite chat history stored in the cloud;Will soon be searchable too;Phew, that's a lot and we're building more constantly.;Desktop app for Mac. Windows, iPhone and Android coming soon. Works perfectly in mobile web browsers.	Apps for every platform; Open source; Seamless integrations with everything you use
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 23.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 8.9K
Stacks 225	Stacks 223
Followers 257	Followers 344
Votes 277	Votes 366
Pros & Cons
Pros 63 Github integration 55 Free 45 Markdown support 19 Markdown 17 Graceful integration Cons 2 Sends data to US Gov	Pros 65 Open source 48 Great Community 40 Extensive developer documentation 38 Powered by Python 34 Clean & Smooth UI Cons 1 Integration with most of well known services 0 The interface require a lot of overhaul
Integrations
Sprint.ly GitHub Trello Travis CI Jenkins	GitLab Heroku Git Bitbucket Sentry Trello GitHub Librato Slack Jira

What are some alternatives to Gitter, Zulip?

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Let's Chat

Let's Chat is a persistent messaging application that runs on Node.js and MongoDB. It's designed to be easily deployable and fits well with small, intimate teams. It's free (MIT licensed) and ships with killer features such as LDAP/Kerberos authentication, a REST-like API and XMPP support.

Related Comparisons

Gitter vs Zulip: What are the differences?

Cost: Gitter is free to use for public repositories, while Zulip offers a free plan with limited features and pricing for additional features.
Organization of Conversations: Gitter uses a linear chat system where all messages are displayed in order, while Zulip employs a topic-based threading system for more organized discussions.
Integration: Zulip supports a wide range of integrations with third-party services and tools, whereas Gitter has limited integration options.
Notification System: Zulip offers more advanced notification settings, allowing users to customize how they receive alerts for different conversations, while Gitter has basic notification options.
User Interface: Zulip has a more modern and visually appealing interface compared to Gitter, offering a better user experience.

In Summary, Gitter and Zulip differ in terms of cost, conversation organization, integration, notification system, and user interface.

Gitter vs Zulip

Overview