StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Go Micro vs Micro

Go Micro vs Micro

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Micro
Micro
Stacks89
Followers55
Votes2
Go Micro
Go Micro
Stacks20
Followers47
Votes0
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks2.4K

Go Micro vs Micro: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will provide a comparison between Go Micro and Micro, highlighting the key differences between the two. Go Micro and Micro are both frameworks for building distributed systems and microservices.

  1. Extensibility: Go Micro provides a highly extensible framework that enables developers to easily add their own functionality and customize the system according to their requirements. On the other hand, Micro offers a more opinionated approach, providing pre-defined components and plugins to assist in building microservices, which may limit the level of extensibility.

  2. Language Support: Go Micro is primarily focused on supporting applications written in the Go programming language. It provides a Go-centric approach to building microservices, leveraging Go's features and ecosystem. In contrast, Micro aims to be language-agnostic, allowing developers to build microservices using different programming languages such as Go, Python, and Node.js.

  3. Service Discovery: Go Micro utilizes service discovery to handle the registration and discovery of microservices within a distributed system. It includes support for various service discovery mechanisms like DNS, Consul, and etcd. Micro, on the other hand, relies on its own built-in service discovery system called "mDNS" (multicast DNS), which enables decentralized service discovery without the need for external dependencies.

  4. Transport Protocols: Go Micro provides support for multiple transport protocols, including HTTP, TCP, and NATS. It allows developers to choose the most suitable transport protocol based on their use case. In contrast, Micro emphasizes the use of the HTTP protocol as the primary transport mechanism for communication between microservices.

  5. API Gateway: Go Micro does not include an API gateway as part of its core functionality. However, it provides the flexibility to build and integrate an API gateway within the system as per the developer's requirements. On the other hand, Micro offers a built-in API gateway called "Micro API" that allows developers to easily expose microservices as HTTP APIs without additional configuration.

  6. Error Handling: Go Micro focuses on providing a pluggable error handling mechanism, allowing developers to define their own error handling strategies for different scenarios. Micro, on the other hand, provides a standardized error handling mechanism that follows the microservices best practices, promoting a consistent error handling approach across services.

In Summary, Go Micro offers a more extensible and Go-centric approach with support for multiple transport protocols and flexible error handling, while Micro provides a more opinionated and language-agnostic framework with its own built-in service discovery system and API gateway.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Micro
Micro
Go Micro
Go Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

It provides the core requirements for distributed systems development including RPC and Event driven communication. The micro philosophy is sane defaults with a pluggable architecture. We provide defaults to get you started quickly but everything can be easily swapped out.

Authentication; Config Management; Key-Value Storage; API Gateway; Service Discovery; Event Streaming
Service Discovery; Load Balancing; Message Encoding; Async Messaging; Pluggable Interfaces
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.4K
Stacks
89
Stacks
20
Followers
55
Followers
47
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Great flexibility
  • 1
    Nice tooling
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Micro, Go Micro ?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana