StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. Godot vs OpenFL

Godot vs OpenFL

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenFL
OpenFL
Stacks11
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.1K
Forks475
Godot
Godot
Stacks222
Followers270
Votes47

Godot vs OpenFL: What are the differences?

Introduction Godot and OpenFL are both popular open-source game development frameworks that offer different features and functionalities for developers. Understanding the key differences between the two can help developers choose the right tool for their projects.

  1. Language Support: Godot primarily uses its own scripting language called GDScript, which is similar to Python, while OpenFL supports multiple languages such as Haxe and ActionScript. This difference in language support can impact the learning curve and development process for developers.

  2. Rendering Engine: Godot utilizes a custom-built 2D and 3D rendering engine, providing robust and efficient graphics capabilities for game development. In contrast, OpenFL leverages the hardware-accelerated rendering capabilities of Adobe Flash, offering high-quality visuals for 2D games.

  3. Platform Compatibility: Godot is compatible with multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and HTML5, making it versatile for cross-platform development. On the other hand, OpenFL focuses on web and mobile platforms, offering strong support for web-based games and applications.

  4. Community and Support: Godot has a growing community of developers and a vibrant ecosystem with helpful documentation and tutorials, fostering collaboration and knowledge-sharing among users. OpenFL also has a supportive community but may have fewer resources compared to Godot.

  5. Ease of Use: Godot is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive editor, making it easier for beginners to get started with game development. OpenFL, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve due to its flexibility and extensive features.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Godot and OpenFL in terms of language support, rendering engine, platform compatibility, community support, and ease of use can help developers choose the right game development framework for their projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenFL
OpenFL
Godot
Godot

It enables creative expression for the desktop, mobile and web. Enterprise applications and best-selling games are made with it, publishing native, Flash and HTML5 applications using one seamless toolset.

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Vector Graphics; Seamless support for image, canvas and typed array pixel stores;Text Support;Sound Support; Batched tile rendering; Video rendering; Asset management; MovieClip animations
Innovative Design; Gorgeous 3d graphics; Create 2d games with ease; Script with full freedom; Debug and optimize
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
475
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
11
Stacks
222
Followers
15
Followers
270
Votes
0
Votes
47
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 14
    Open source
  • 7
    Supports both C++, C# and GDScript
  • 7
    Cross-Platform
  • 7
    Easy to port
  • 5
    Simple
Cons
  • 1
    Need opengl 2.1 / 3.3
  • 1
    Somewhat poor 3D performance and lacks automatic LODs
  • 1
    Performance in 3D
  • 1
    Harder to learn
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript
ES6
ES6
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Haxe
Haxe
JetBrains Rider
JetBrains Rider
PlayFab
PlayFab
Ninject
Ninject
Vuforia
Vuforia
Pushwoosh
Pushwoosh
Helpshift
Helpshift

What are some alternatives to OpenFL, Godot?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase