Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google App Engine
Google App Engine

4.2K
3.1K
+ 1
610
Heroku
Heroku

10.5K
8.1K
+ 1
3.2K
Paz
Paz

0
2
+ 1
0
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Google App Engine?

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

What is Heroku?

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

What is Paz?

A pluggable in-house service platform with a PaaS-like workflow, built on Docker, CoreOS, Etcd and Fleet.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Google App Engine?
Why do developers choose Heroku?
Why do developers choose Paz?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Google App Engine?
        What companies use Heroku?
        What companies use Paz?
          No companies found

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with Google App Engine?
          What tools integrate with Heroku?
          What tools integrate with Paz?

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, Heroku, and Paz?
          Amazon Web Services
          It provides on-demand cloud computing platforms to individuals, companies and governments. It offers reliable, scalable, and inexpensive cloud computing services.
          DigitalOcean
          We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.
          AWS Lambda
          AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.
          Kubernetes
          Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
          AWS Elastic Beanstalk
          Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.
          See all alternatives
          Decisions about Google App Engine, Heroku, and Paz
          Jerome Dalbert
          Jerome Dalbert
          Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare · | 7 upvotes · 23.5K views
          atGratify CommerceGratify Commerce
          Rails
          Rails
          Heroku
          Heroku
          AWS Elastic Beanstalk
          AWS Elastic Beanstalk
          #PaaS

          When creating the web infrastructure for our start-up, I wanted to host our app on a PaaS to get started quickly.

          A very popular one for Rails is Heroku, which I love for free hobby side projects, but never used professionally. On the other hand, I was very familiar with the AWS ecosystem, and since I was going to use some of its services anyways, I thought: why not go all in on it?

          It turns out that Amazon offers a PaaS called AWS Elastic Beanstalk, which is basically like an “AWS Heroku”. It even comes with a similar command-line utility, called "eb”. While edge-case Rails problems are not as well documented as with Heroku, it was very satisfying to manage all our cloud services under the same AWS account. There are auto-scaling options for web and worker instances, which is a nice touch. Overall, it was reliable, and I would recommend it to anyone planning on heavily using AWS.

          See more
          Russel Werner
          Russel Werner
          Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 27 upvotes · 676.2K views
          atStackShareStackShare
          React
          React
          Glamorous
          Glamorous
          Apollo
          Apollo
          Node.js
          Node.js
          Rails
          Rails
          Heroku
          Heroku
          GitHub
          GitHub
          Amazon S3
          Amazon S3
          Amazon CloudFront
          Amazon CloudFront
          Webpack
          Webpack
          CircleCI
          CircleCI
          Redis
          Redis
          #StackDecisionsLaunch
          #SSR
          #Microservices
          #FrontEndRepoSplit

          StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

          Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

          #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

          See more
          AWS Elastic Beanstalk
          AWS Elastic Beanstalk
          Heroku
          Heroku
          Ruby
          Ruby
          Rails
          Rails
          Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
          Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
          MariaDB
          MariaDB
          Microsoft SQL Server
          Microsoft SQL Server
          Amazon RDS
          Amazon RDS
          AWS Lambda
          AWS Lambda
          Python
          Python
          Redis
          Redis
          Memcached
          Memcached
          AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
          AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
          Amazon Elasticsearch Service
          Amazon Elasticsearch Service
          Amazon ElastiCache
          Amazon ElastiCache

          We initially started out with Heroku as our PaaS provider due to a desire to use it by our original developer for our Ruby on Rails application/website at the time. We were finding response times slow, it was painfully slow, sometimes taking 10 seconds to start loading the main page. Moving up to the next "compute" level was going to be very expensive.

          We moved our site over to AWS Elastic Beanstalk , not only did response times on the site practically become instant, our cloud bill for the application was cut in half.

          In database world we are currently using Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL also, we have both MariaDB and Microsoft SQL Server both hosted on Amazon RDS. The plan is to migrate to AWS Aurora Serverless for all 3 of those database systems.

          Additional services we use for our public applications: AWS Lambda, Python, Redis, Memcached, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon Elasticsearch Service, Amazon ElastiCache

          See more
          frido
          frido
          Heroku
          Heroku
          Red Hat OpenShift
          Red Hat OpenShift
          Docker
          Docker

          Heroku vs OpenShift. I've never decided which one is better. Heroku is easier to configure. Openshift provide a better machine for free. Heroku has many addons for free. I've chosen Heroku because of easy initial set-up. I had deployment based on git push. I also tried direct deployment of jar file. Currently Heroku runs my Docker image. Heroku has very good documentation like for beginners. So if you want to start with something, let's follow Heroku. On the other hand OpenShift seems like a PRO tool supported by @RedHat.

          See more
          Gunicorn
          Gunicorn
          uWSGI
          uWSGI
          Heroku
          Heroku
          AWS Elastic Beanstalk
          AWS Elastic Beanstalk

          I use Gunicorn because does one thing - it’s a WSGI HTTP server - and it does it well. Deploy it quickly and easily, and let the rest of your stack do what the rest of your stack does well, wherever that may be.

          uWSGI “aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services” - if that’s a thing you need then ok, but I like the principle of doing one thing well, and I deploy to platforms like Heroku and AWS Elastic Beanstalk where the rest of the “hosting service” is provided and managed for me.

          See more
          Munkhtegsh Munkhbat
          Munkhtegsh Munkhbat
          Software Engineer Consultant at LoanSnap · | 9 upvotes · 53.2K views
          graphql-yoga
          graphql-yoga
          Prisma
          Prisma
          PostgreSQL
          PostgreSQL
          styled-components
          styled-components
          Heroku
          Heroku
          React
          React
          Apollo
          Apollo
          GraphQL
          GraphQL
          #Backend
          #Frontend

          In my last side project, I built a web posting application that has similar features as Facebook and hosted on Heroku. The user can register an account, create posts, upload images and share with others. I took an advantage of graphql-subscriptions to handle realtime notifications in the comments section. Currently, I'm at the last stage of styling and building layouts.

          For the #Backend I used graphql-yoga, Prisma, GraphQL with PostgreSQL database. For the #FrontEnd: React, styled-components with Apollo. The app is hosted on Heroku.

          See more
          Interest over time
          Reviews of Google App Engine, Heroku, and Paz
          Review ofHerokuHeroku

          I use Heroku, for almost any project of mine. Their free plan is awesome for testing, solo developers or your startup and its almost impossible to not cover you somehow. Adding an add on is a simple command away and I find it easy to use it both on my Windows PC or my Linux laptop. Their documentation, covers almost everything. In particular I have used Heroku for Spring, Django and AngularJS. I even find it easier to run my project on my local dev with foreman start, than ./manage.py runserver (for my django projects). There is no place like Heroku for the developer!

          Review ofHerokuHeroku

          Can't beat the simplicity of deploying and managing apps, the pricing is a bit high, but you are paying for those streamlined tools. However, after several experiences of tracing issues back to Heroku's stack, not having visibility into what they are doing has prompted moving two applications off of it and on to other more transparent cloud solutions. Heroku is amazing for what it is, hosting for early stage products.

          Review ofGoogle App EngineGoogle App Engine

          With Cloud Endpoints you can create and deploy mobile backend in one hour or less. And it is free (until you need extra scale). I would not recommend to use Java - python is faster and has all new appengine features.

          Pros: everything is in one place: task queue, cron, backend instances for data processing, datastore, mapreduce. Cons: you cannot easily move your code from GAE. Even with special 3rd party services.

          Review ofHerokuHeroku

          I've been using Heroku for 3 years now, they have grown super fast and each time they're improving their services. What I really like the most is how easily you can show to your client the advances on you project, it would take you maximum 15 minutes to configure two environments (Staging/Production). It is simply essential and fantastic!

          Review ofHerokuHeroku

          I liked how easy this was to use and that I could create some proof of concepts without have to pay. The downside for NodeJS is remote debugging. Pretty much have to depend on logging where Azure allows remote debugging with Node Inspector.

          Review ofHerokuHeroku

          Using Heroku takes away all the pains associated with managing compute and backing services. It may require a little extra optimisation and tweaks, but these constraints often make your app better anyway.

          Review ofGoogle App EngineGoogle App Engine

          With Cloud Endpoints you can create and deploy mobile backend in one hour or less.

          How developers use Google App Engine, Heroku, and Paz
          Avatar of StackShare
          StackShare uses HerokuHeroku

          Not having to deal with servers is a huge win for us. There are certainly trade-offs (having to wait if the platform is down as opposed to being able to fix the issue), but we’re happy being on Heroku right now. Being able to focus 100% of our technical efforts on application code is immensely helpful.

          Two dynos seems to be the sweet spot for our application. We can handle traffic spikes and get pretty consistent performance otherwise.

          We have a total of four apps on Heroku: Legacy Leanstack, StackShare Prod, StackShare Staging, StackShare Dev. Protip: if you’re setting up multiple environments based on your prod environment, just run heroku fork app name. Super useful, it copies over your db, add-ons, and settings.

          We have a develop branch on GitHub that we push to dev to test out, then if everything is cool we push it to staging and eventually prod. Hotfixes of course go straight to staging and then prod usually.

          Avatar of Casey Smith
          Casey Smith uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

          PaaS for back-end components, including external data ingestion APIs, front-end web service APIs, hosting of static front-end application assets, back-end data processing pipeline microservices, APIs to storage infrastructure (Cloud SQL and Memcached), and data processing pipeline task queues and cron jobs. Task queue fan-out and auto-scaling of back-end microservice instances provide parallelism for high velocity data processing.

          Avatar of StackShare
          StackShare uses HerokuHeroku

          We keep the Metrics tab open while we load test, and hit refresh to see what’s going on: heroku metric

          I would expect the graphs to expand with some sort of detail, but that’s not the case. So these metrics aren’t very useful. The logs are far more useful, so we just keep the tail open while we test.

          Avatar of Lawrence Cheuk
          Lawrence Cheuk uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

          checking a swap require a lot of cpu resource, roster normally come out same day of month, every month, at a particular time. Which make very high spike, our flag ship product, iSwap, with the capability looking swap possibility with 10000 other rosters base on user critieria, you need a cloud computing give you this magnitude of computing power. gae did it nicely, user friendly, easy to you, low cost.

          Avatar of Tim Lucas
          Tim Lucas uses HerokuHeroku

          Heroku runs the web and background worker processes. Auto-deployments are triggered via GitHub commits and wait for the Buildkite test build to pass. Heroku pipelines with beta release phase execution (for automatically running database migrations) allowed for easy manual testing of big new releases. Web and worker logs are sent to Papertrail.

          Avatar of Jeff Flynn
          Jeff Flynn uses HerokuHeroku

          As much as I love AWS EC, I prefer Heroku for apps like this. Heroku has grown up around Rails and Ruby, massive set of add-ons that are usually one-click setup, and I once had to perform an emergency app scale-up a that I completed in seconds from my mobile phone whilst riding the Bangkok subway. Doesn't get much easier than that.

          Avatar of danlangford
          danlangford uses HerokuHeroku

          With its complimentary SSL (on *.herokuapp.com) we can test everything. Our dev branch is built and deployed out to Heroku. Testing happens out here. not production cause $20/mo is TOO much to pay for the ability to use my own SSL purchased elsewhere.

          Avatar of CommentBox.io
          CommentBox.io uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

          App engine fills in the gaps in the increasingly smaller case where it's necessary for us to run our own APIs.

          Avatar of Abhijeet Gokar
          Abhijeet Gokar uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

          Very easy to make cloud computing of ML models , and use containers like Kubernetes.

          Avatar of Vamsi Krishna
          Vamsi Krishna uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

          Cloud instances to run our app, Cloud MySQL , Network Load Balancer

          How much does Google App Engine cost?
          How much does Heroku cost?
          How much does Paz cost?
          Pricing unavailable
          News about Paz
          More news