Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google Cloud SQL vs InfluxDB: What are the differences?
Introduction:
When it comes to storing and managing data, Google Cloud SQL and InfluxDB are two popular choices among developers and organizations. Both offer different features and capabilities that cater to specific use cases. Understanding the key differences between Google Cloud SQL and InfluxDB can help in making an informed decision based on individual requirements.
Database Type: Google Cloud SQL is a relational database service offered by Google Cloud Platform that supports popular databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server. On the other hand, InfluxDB is a time-series database specifically designed for handling time-sensitive data such as monitoring, IoT, and real-time analytics.
Data Model: Google Cloud SQL follows a traditional relational database model with tables, rows, and columns, making it suitable for structured data storage and complex query operations. In contrast, InfluxDB utilizes a time-series data model, optimized for storing and querying time-stamped data points efficiently with high write and query performance.
Scalability: Google Cloud SQL offers vertical scaling, where resources can be increased by upgrading the instance size, but scaling out horizontally can be limited. InfluxDB, on the other hand, is designed for horizontal scalability, allowing users to distribute data across multiple nodes to handle high throughput and large volumes of time-series data effectively.
Query Language: Google Cloud SQL supports standard SQL queries for accessing and manipulating data within the relational databases it supports, making it familiar to users experienced with SQL. In contrast, InfluxDB uses a specialized query language called InfluxQL tailored for time-series data operations, including functions for aggregations, downsampling, and retention policies.
Use Cases: Google Cloud SQL is well-suited for traditional application development, e-commerce platforms, and business applications that require ACID compliance and a relational data model. InfluxDB, on the other hand, shines in use cases that involve storing and analyzing time-series data such as monitoring system metrics, IoT sensor data, and operational analytics for real-time insights.
Ecosystem and Integration: Google Cloud SQL seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services like App Engine, Compute Engine, and BigQuery, offering a robust ecosystem for building cloud-native applications. InfluxDB has a strong focus on integrations with monitoring and visualization tools like Grafana, Prometheus, and Telegraf, making it a popular choice for DevOps and IoT applications.
In Summary, understanding the fundamental differences between Google Cloud SQL and InfluxDB in terms of database type, data model, scalability, query language, use cases, and ecosystem can help in choosing the right database solution based on specific requirements and use cases.
I have a lot of data that's currently sitting in a MariaDB database, a lot of tables that weigh 200gb with indexes. Most of the large tables have a date column which is always filtered, but there are usually 4-6 additional columns that are filtered and used for statistics. I'm trying to figure out the best tool for storing and analyzing large amounts of data. Preferably self-hosted or a cheap solution. The current problem I'm running into is speed. Even with pretty good indexes, if I'm trying to load a large dataset, it's pretty slow.
Druid Could be an amazing solution for your use case, My understanding, and the assumption is you are looking to export your data from MariaDB for Analytical workload. It can be used for time series database as well as a data warehouse and can be scaled horizontally once your data increases. It's pretty easy to set up on any environment (Cloud, Kubernetes, or Self-hosted nix system). Some important features which make it a perfect solution for your use case. 1. It can do streaming ingestion (Kafka, Kinesis) as well as batch ingestion (Files from Local & Cloud Storage or Databases like MySQL, Postgres). In your case MariaDB (which has the same drivers to MySQL) 2. Columnar Database, So you can query just the fields which are required, and that runs your query faster automatically. 3. Druid intelligently partitions data based on time and time-based queries are significantly faster than traditional databases. 4. Scale up or down by just adding or removing servers, and Druid automatically rebalances. Fault-tolerant architecture routes around server failures 5. Gives ana amazing centralized UI to manage data sources, query, tasks.
We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.
So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily
We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale, and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us a We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us better performance by far.
Druid is amazing for this use case and is a cloud-native solution that can be deployed on any cloud infrastructure or on Kubernetes. - Easy to scale horizontally - Column Oriented Database - SQL to query data - Streaming and Batch Ingestion - Native search indexes It has feature to work as TimeSeriesDB, Datawarehouse, and has Time-optimized partitioning.
if you want to find a serverless solution with capability of a lot of storage and SQL kind of capability then google bigquery is the best solution for that.
I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.
The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)
We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection
Pros of Google Cloud SQL
- Fully managed13
- Backed by Google10
- SQL10
- Flexible4
- Encryption at rest and transit3
- Automatic Software Patching3
- Replication across multiple zone by default3
Pros of InfluxDB
- Time-series data analysis59
- Easy setup, no dependencies30
- Fast, scalable & open source24
- Open source21
- Real-time analytics20
- Continuous Query support6
- Easy Query Language5
- HTTP API4
- Out-of-the-box, automatic Retention Policy4
- Offers Enterprise version1
- Free Open Source version1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Google Cloud SQL
Cons of InfluxDB
- Instability4
- Proprietary query language1
- HA or Clustering is only in paid version1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Google Cloud SQL?
What is InfluxDB?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Google Cloud SQL?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+27