Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Hadoop vs RocksDB: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Hadoop and RocksDB are both powerful tools used in big data processing, but they have key differences that make them suitable for different use cases. Below are the key differences between Hadoop and RocksDB:
Storage Type: Hadoop is designed for distributed storage and processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using a simple programming model. On the other hand, RocksDB is an embedded key-value store optimized for fast storage and retrieval of data on local storage devices like hard drives or solid-state drives (SSDs).
Use Case: Hadoop is commonly used for batch processing of large data sets where fault tolerance and scalability are essential. It is ideal for processing large volumes of data in a distributed environment. In contrast, RocksDB is suitable for applications that require low-latency reads and writes, making it a good choice for real-time processing and caching.
Consistency Model: Hadoop follows a strong consistency model, ensuring that all nodes see the same data at the same time. This ensures data integrity but may impact performance in certain scenarios. RocksDB, on the other hand, allows for eventual consistency, where some nodes may have slightly outdated data at any given time, prioritizing performance over strict consistency.
Query Language: Hadoop uses MapReduce as its processing model, which involves writing code in Java, Python, or other languages to process data. RocksDB, being a key-value store, provides an API for storing and retrieving data directly without the need for complex query languages.
Data Processing Speed: Due to its distributed nature, Hadoop may face issues related to data transfer and network latency, impacting processing speed. RocksDB, being a local storage engine, can offer faster data processing speeds by minimizing data transfer over a network and accessing data directly from local storage.
Scalability: Hadoop is highly scalable and can handle petabytes of data across large clusters of machines, making it suitable for organizations dealing with massive data volumes. RocksDB, while not designed for distributed processing, can scale vertically by leveraging faster storage devices or increasing memory capacity for improved performance.
In Summary, Hadoop is suited for distributed batch processing of large data sets, while RocksDB excels in low-latency read/write operations for real-time processing and caching applications.
I am researching different querying solutions to handle ~1 trillion records of data (in the realm of a petabyte). The data is mostly textual. I have identified a few options: Milvus, HBase, RocksDB, and Elasticsearch. I was wondering if there is a good way to compare the performance of these options (or if anyone has already done something like this). I want to be able to compare the speed of ingesting and querying textual data from these tools. Does anyone have information on this or know where I can find some? Thanks in advance!
You've probably come to a decision already but for those reading...here are some resources we put together to help people learn more about Milvus and other databases https://zilliz.com/comparison and https://github.com/zilliztech/VectorDBBench. I don't think they include RocksDB or HBase yet (you could could recommend on GitHub) but hopefully they help answer your Elastic Search questions.
For a property and casualty insurance company, we currently use MarkLogic and Hadoop for our raw data lake. Trying to figure out how snowflake fits in the picture. Does anybody have some good suggestions/best practices for when to use and what data to store in Mark logic versus Snowflake versus a hadoop or all three of these platforms redundant with one another?
for property and casualty insurance company we current Use marklogic and Hadoop for our raw data lake. Trying to figure out how snowflake fits in the picture. Does anybody have some good suggestions/best practices for when to use and what data to store in Mark logic versus snowflake versus a hadoop or all three of these platforms redundant with one another?
As i see it, you can use Snowflake as your data warehouse and marklogic as a data lake. You can add all your raw data to ML and curate it to a company data model to then supply this to Snowflake. You could try to implement the dw functionality on marklogic but it will just cost you alot of time. If you are using Aws version of Snowflake you can use ML spark connector to access the data. As an extra you can use the ML also as an Operational report system if you join it with a Reporting tool lie PowerBi. With extra apis you can also provide data to other systems with ML as source.
I have a lot of data that's currently sitting in a MariaDB database, a lot of tables that weigh 200gb with indexes. Most of the large tables have a date column which is always filtered, but there are usually 4-6 additional columns that are filtered and used for statistics. I'm trying to figure out the best tool for storing and analyzing large amounts of data. Preferably self-hosted or a cheap solution. The current problem I'm running into is speed. Even with pretty good indexes, if I'm trying to load a large dataset, it's pretty slow.
Druid Could be an amazing solution for your use case, My understanding, and the assumption is you are looking to export your data from MariaDB for Analytical workload. It can be used for time series database as well as a data warehouse and can be scaled horizontally once your data increases. It's pretty easy to set up on any environment (Cloud, Kubernetes, or Self-hosted nix system). Some important features which make it a perfect solution for your use case. 1. It can do streaming ingestion (Kafka, Kinesis) as well as batch ingestion (Files from Local & Cloud Storage or Databases like MySQL, Postgres). In your case MariaDB (which has the same drivers to MySQL) 2. Columnar Database, So you can query just the fields which are required, and that runs your query faster automatically. 3. Druid intelligently partitions data based on time and time-based queries are significantly faster than traditional databases. 4. Scale up or down by just adding or removing servers, and Druid automatically rebalances. Fault-tolerant architecture routes around server failures 5. Gives ana amazing centralized UI to manage data sources, query, tasks.
Pros of Hadoop
- Great ecosystem39
- One stack to rule them all11
- Great load balancer4
- Amazon aws1
- Java syntax1
Pros of RocksDB
- Very fast5
- Made by Facebook3
- Consistent performance2
- Ability to add logic to the database layer where needed1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
What is Hadoop?
What is RocksDB?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Hadoop?
What tools integrate with RocksDB?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+5
+3
+6
+4
+8
+4
+6
+16