StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Heroku vs Render

Heroku vs Render

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
CoreRender
CoreRender
Stacks56
Followers55
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.2K
Forks96

Heroku vs Render: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Heroku and Render

Heroku and Render are both cloud platform-as-a-service (PaaS) providers that enable developers to deploy, manage, and scale their applications. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

1. Deployment Process: Heroku provides a streamlined deployment process where developers can simply push their code to a Git repository, and Heroku automatically builds and deploys the application. On the other hand, Render requires developers to define their deployment settings using a render.yaml file, which allows for more control and customization but requires additional configuration.

2. Pricing Model: Heroku has a flexibale pricing model based on dyno usage, offering both free and paid options. Render, on the other hand, offers a simpler pricing model based on actual resource consumption, allowing users to pay only for what they use, making it more cost-effective for small-scale applications.

3. Scalability: Heroku provides automatic horizontal and vertical scalability, allowing developers to easily scale their applications up or down based on demand. Render also offers automatic horizontal scaling, but lacks vertical scalability, meaning that developers have to manually adjust the number of instances to handle increased usage.

4. Environment Variables: Heroku provides a simple way to manage environment variables through their web interface or command-line tools, making it easy to handle sensitive information. Render, on the other hand, requires developers to manage environment variables using their render.yaml configuration file, which adds an extra layer of complexity.

5. Container Support: Heroku uses a proprietary containerization technology called "dynos" to run applications, while Render supports both Docker containers and static site deployments. Render's support for Docker containers allows developers to easily deploy and manage complex applications with specific dependencies.

6. Database Support: Heroku offers an extensive range of supported databases, including popular options like PostgreSQL and MySQL, as well as managed services like Heroku Postgres. Render, on the other hand, currently only supports PostgreSQL as a managed database service, limiting the options for developers who require different database technologies.

In Summary, the key differences between Heroku and Render include the deployment process, pricing model, scalability options, environment variable management, container support, and database options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
CoreRender
CoreRender

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

React-inspired Swift library for writing UIKit UIs.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
96
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
56
Followers
20.5K
Followers
55
Votes
3.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 7
    Storage
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
React
React
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to Heroku, CoreRender?

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase