Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
HTTPie vs Postman: What are the differences?
Introduction:
HTTPie and Postman are both popular tools used for testing and interacting with APIs. While they have similar functionalities, there are some key differences between the two.
Authentication Support: Postman provides a wide range of authentication options, including Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and Digest Auth. On the other hand, HTTPie primarily supports Basic Auth and Digest Auth, but also provides extension mechanisms for custom authentication schemes.
Command Line Interface vs. GUI: HTTPie is primarily a command line tool, which makes it ideal for running automated tests and scripting. On the other hand, Postman has a graphical user interface (GUI), which provides a more intuitive and visual way of interacting with APIs.
Environment Variables: Postman allows you to define and use environment variables, which can be handy when working with multiple environments or when you need to reuse values across different requests. However, HTTPie does not natively support environment variables, although you can achieve similar functionality using shell environment variables.
Request Configuration: In Postman, you can easily configure headers, query parameters, and request body using a visual interface, making it convenient for users who prefer a GUI-driven approach. HTTPie, on the other hand, requires you to specify the request components as command line arguments or in a separate file, making it more suitable for users who prefer a text-based, scripted approach.
Response Output: HTTPie provides a simple and readable output by default, which can be useful for quickly inspecting the response. Postman, on the other hand, provides a rich and detailed response view with options to view various aspects of the response, such as headers, cookies, and response timings.
Additional Features: While both HTTPie and Postman offer powerful features, they have some additional functionalities that set them apart. HTTPie supports automatic JSON serialization/deserialization and has a plugin system for extending its capabilities. Postman provides advanced features like API documentation generation, collaboration with team members, and API testing workflows.
In Summary, HTTPie and Postman have key differences in terms of authentication support, command line interface vs. GUI, environment variables, request configuration, response output, and additional features. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and user preferences.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of HTTPie
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of HTTPie
- No support for HTTP/21
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1