Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

IronMQ

35
49
+ 1
36
MediatR

57
38
+ 1
0
Add tool

MediatR vs IronMQ: What are the differences?

Developers describe MediatR as "In-process messaging with no dependencies". It is a low-ambition library trying to solve a simple problem — decoupling the in-process sending of messages from handling messages. Cross-platform, supporting .NET Framework 4.6.1 and netstandard2.0. On the other hand, IronMQ is detailed as "Message Queue for any deployment". An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

MediatR and IronMQ can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of IronMQ
Pros of MediatR
  • 12
    Great Support
  • 8
    Heroku Add-on
  • 3
    Push support
  • 3
    Delayed delivery upto 7 days
  • 2
    Super fast
  • 2
    Language agnostic
  • 2
    Good analytics/monitoring
  • 2
    Ease of configuration
  • 2
    GDPR Compliant
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of IronMQ
    Cons of MediatR
    • 1
      Can't use rabbitmqadmin
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is IronMQ?

      An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

      What is MediatR?

      It is a low-ambition library trying to solve a simple problem — decoupling the in-process sending of messages from handling messages. Cross-platform, supporting .NET Framework 4.6.1 and netstandard2.0.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use IronMQ?
      What companies use MediatR?
      See which teams inside your own company are using IronMQ or MediatR.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with IronMQ?
      What tools integrate with MediatR?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to IronMQ and MediatR?
      RabbitMQ
      RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
      Kafka
      Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
      CloudAMQP
      Fully managed, highly available RabbitMQ servers and clusters, on all major compute platforms.
      Amazon SQS
      Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
      Celery
      Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
      See all alternatives