IronMQ vs simplehttp: What are the differences?
Developers describe IronMQ as "Message Queue for any deployment". An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance. On the other hand, simplehttp is detailed as "A family of libraries and daemons built upon libevent that make high performance HTTP servers simple and straightforward to write". .
IronMQ and simplehttp can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.
simplehttp is an open source tool with 480 GitHub stars and 73 GitHub forks. Here's a link to simplehttp's open source repository on GitHub.
What is IronMQ?
What is simplehttp?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose simplehttp?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using simplehttp?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with simplehttp?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
I deploy to Heroku. However, my applications require full linux applications that cannot be deployed to Heroku. I deploy them to Rackspace.
Then Heroku and Rackspace communicate over IronMQ. Problem solved.