IronMQ vs simplehttp

IronMQ
IronMQ

29
29
+ 1
34
simplehttp
simplehttp

1
4
+ 1
0
Add tool

IronMQ vs simplehttp: What are the differences?

Developers describe IronMQ as "Message Queue for any deployment". An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance. On the other hand, simplehttp is detailed as "A family of libraries and daemons built upon libevent that make high performance HTTP servers simple and straightforward to write". .

IronMQ and simplehttp can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.

simplehttp is an open source tool with 480 GitHub stars and 73 GitHub forks. Here's a link to simplehttp's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

What is simplehttp?

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose IronMQ?
Why do developers choose simplehttp?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    What are the cons of using IronMQ?
    What are the cons of using simplehttp?
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use IronMQ?
      What companies use simplehttp?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with IronMQ?
      What tools integrate with simplehttp?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to IronMQ and simplehttp?
        RabbitMQ
        RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
        Kafka
        Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
        Amazon SQS
        Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
        Celery
        Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
        ActiveMQ
        Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about IronMQ and simplehttp
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of IronMQ and simplehttp
        Avatar of umuro
        Co-Founder at Publitory
        Review ofIronMQIronMQ

        I deploy to Heroku. However, my applications require full linux applications that cannot be deployed to Heroku. I deploy them to Rackspace.

        Then Heroku and Rackspace communicate over IronMQ. Problem solved.

        How developers use IronMQ and simplehttp
        Avatar of True Fiction Production AB
        True Fiction Production AB uses IronMQIronMQ

        Process queues

        How much does IronMQ cost?
        How much does simplehttp cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        News about simplehttp
        More news