StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs Octopus Deploy

Jenkins vs Octopus Deploy

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Stacks407
Followers493
Votes118

Jenkins vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

Jenkins and Octopus Deploy are both popular tools used in the DevOps world to automate software delivery and deployment processes. Let's explore the key differences between Jenkins and Octopus Deploy.

  1. Architecture and Integration: Jenkins is primarily designed as a continuous integration (CI) server, focused on building and testing code. It integrates well with other tools and can be used as part of a larger CI/CD pipeline. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy is a deployment automation tool specifically designed for deploying applications and managing releases in a more automated and controlled manner. It integrates well with various deployment targets such as IIS, Azure, AWS, and others.

  2. User Interface and Ease of Use: Jenkins has a more technical and developer-centric user interface, making it easier for technical users to navigate and configure. It provides greater flexibility and customization options for complex build and deployment workflows. In contrast, Octopus Deploy has a more user-friendly and intuitive interface, specifically designed for operations and release managers to easily define and manage deployment processes without requiring extensive technical knowledge.

  3. Deployment Process Management: Jenkins is mainly focused on the build and testing processes and provides limited built-in features for managing the deployment process. It requires additional plugins and configurations to support deployment automation. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy is specifically designed to handle deployment process management, providing a wide range of built-in features to manage and automate the entire deployment pipeline, including pre and post-deployment steps, approvals, rollback mechanisms, and managing multiple environments.

  4. Deployment Target Support: Jenkins can deploy to various targets but requires additional plugins and configurations to support different deployment scenarios and types of applications. In contrast, Octopus Deploy has native support for a wide range of deployment targets, including IIS, Azure, AWS, Kubernetes, and others. It simplifies the deployment process by providing out-of-the-box step templates and deployment scripts specific to each deployment target.

  5. Release Management: Jenkins provides some level of release management capabilities through plugins, but it focuses more on the build and continuous integration aspects rather than release management. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, has a robust release management feature set, allowing users to define and manage release versions, track releases, and support rollbacks. It provides a centralized view of all released versions and their deployment status.

  6. Security and Access Control: Jenkins provides basic access control features, but it requires extra configurations and plugins to define more granular security roles and permissions. Octopus Deploy, being a deployment automation tool, inherently provides advanced security and access control features, allowing fine-grained permissions and ensuring secure access to deployment processes and sensitive data such as credentials.

In summary, Jenkins is primarily a CI server with limited built-in deployment features, whereas Octopus Deploy is a dedicated deployment automation tool with advanced release management capabilities and native support for various deployment targets.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Octopus Deploy

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
407
Followers
50.4K
Followers
493
Votes
2.2K
Votes
118
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
Cons
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
  • 2
    Management of Config
Integrations
No integrations available
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jira
Jira
Appveyor
Appveyor
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Octopus Deploy?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana