Jenkins vs Semaphore

Jenkins
Jenkins

11.4K
3.1K
2K
Semaphore
Semaphore

121
2
81
Add tool

Jenkins vs Semaphore: What are the differences?

Developers describe Jenkins as "An extendable open source continuous integration server". In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project. On the other hand, Semaphore is detailed as "The continuous integration and delivery platform powering the world’s best engineering teams". Semaphore is the fastest continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform on the market, powering the world’s best engineering teams.

Jenkins and Semaphore belong to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Jenkins are:

  • Easy installation
  • Easy configuration
  • Change set support

On the other hand, Semaphore provides the following key features:

  • Docker, Kubernetes, iOS support & 100+ preinstalled Tools
  • Customizable Continuous Delivery Pipelines
  • Customizable Stages, Parallel Execution and Control Flow Switches

"Hosted internally" is the primary reason why developers consider Jenkins over the competitors, whereas "Easy setup" was stated as the key factor in picking Semaphore.

Jenkins is an open source tool with 13.3K GitHub stars and 5.48K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Jenkins's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Jenkins has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1774 company stacks & 1526 developers stacks; compared to Semaphore, which is listed in 40 company stacks and 17 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Jenkins?

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

What is Semaphore?

Semaphore is the fastest continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform on the market, powering the world’s best engineering teams.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Jenkins?
Why do developers choose Semaphore?
What are the cons of using Jenkins?
What are the cons of using Semaphore?
    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Jenkins?
    What companies use Semaphore?
    What are some alternatives to Jenkins and Semaphore?
    TeamCity
    TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
    CircleCI
    Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
    Travis CI
    Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.
    Bamboo
    Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
    Apache Maven
    Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.
    See all alternatives
    What tools integrate with Jenkins?
    What tools integrate with Semaphore?
      No integrations found
      Decisions about Jenkins and Semaphore
      No stack decisions found
      Interest over time
      Reviews of Jenkins and Semaphore
      No reviews found
      How developers use Jenkins and Semaphore
      Avatar of Kalibrr
      Kalibrr uses JenkinsJenkins

      All of our pull requests are automatically tested using Jenkins' integration with GitHub, and we provision and deploy our servers using Jenkins' interface. This is integrated with HipChat, immediately notifying us if anything goes wrong with a deployment.

      Avatar of Wirkn Inc.
      Wirkn Inc. uses JenkinsJenkins

      Jenkins is our go-to devops automation tool. We use it for automated test builds, all the way up to server updates and deploys. It really helps maintain our homegrown continuous-integration suite. It even does our blue/green deploys.

      Avatar of Bùi Thanh
      Bùi Thanh uses JenkinsJenkins
      • Continuous Deploy
      • Dev stage: autodeploy by trigger push request from 'develop' branch of Gitlab
      • Staging and production stages: Build and rollback quicly with Ansistrano playbook
      • Sending messages of job results to Chatwork.
      Avatar of AngeloR
      AngeloR uses JenkinsJenkins

      Currently serves as the location that our QA team builds various automated testing jobs.

      At one point we were using it for builds, but we ended up migrating away from them to Code Pipelines.

      Avatar of Trusted Shops GmbH
      Trusted Shops GmbH uses JenkinsJenkins

      We use Jenkins to schedule our Browser and API Based regression and acceptance tests on a regular bases. We use additionally to Jenkins GitlabCI for unit and component testing.

      Avatar of danlangford
      danlangford uses SemaphoreSemaphore

      The Bitbucket integration with branch whitelists allows you to conserve your 100 builds this month.

      Avatar of Riderman De Sousa Barbosa
      Riderman De Sousa Barbosa uses SemaphoreSemaphore

      CI and Deploy (Ionic Viewer and Heroku)

      master -> Deploy develop -> CI

      How much does Jenkins cost?
      How much does Semaphore cost?
      Pricing unavailable